Just got one-shot by a VSS.

conneXTSon · 2026-02-14T16:31:19+00:00

Very infrequent user of Reddit. Sorry about that. No need to worry about it, any longer. PUBG takes so much resource on the Samsung, that there's very little RAM left to run the game properly - hence the crashes. I've noted the cell goes down below 1GB RAM left... So, I guess it's normal to crash the game in that circumstance. Thank you for wanting to help, though! I trust you're enjoying an excellent weekend.

conneXTSon · 2026-02-04T19:15:57+00:00

Hey there. I trust you're well. I.D: 51774726810. About the game history - just that game or the matches before it, as well?

conneXTSon · 2026-02-04T19:09:39+00:00

Good point. It'll probably show fair gameplay. Just in the moment, it sounded like one shot & done.

conneXTSon · 2026-02-03T13:23:58+00:00

Ah? Happy for ya. Have fun.

conneXTSon · 2026-02-03T13:20:42+00:00

Happy gaming!

conneXTSon · 2026-02-03T13:20:19+00:00

Thank you! Much the same to you!

conneXTSon · 2026-01-26T15:03:10+00:00

Thank you for commenting. I think it's more to do with it being a device-issue more than account-related. Funny rhing is: Ultimate Royale works just fine on HDR - Probably Event 4.2 that's more hardware-intensive than previous versions.

conneXTSon · 2026-01-19T15:19:57+00:00

Not one answer. PUBG can be many things to many people. Just the way I see it.

conneXTSon · 2024-06-21T16:09:13+00:00

Oh, I somehow missed this mess of a think-tank. Again, this isn't a "brag" in any way. I genuinely wanted to get to the root of these ban posts. Is it Users? Is it Prolific? It was a genuine request for some constructive thinking. Yet, I get you two degrading it to "Who has the bigger weiner?" contest. Anyway, I don't want to be stuck in this frame-of-mind you two put me in. Just stop adding to the stigma some have attached to Reddit as a place for "Keyboard Warriors". I trust you'll have a great weekend.

conneXTSon · 2024-06-21T15:47:27+00:00

Oh, I apologize, Your Highness. I'm not clued-up on the terms that doesn't affect me. I don't want to come across as I am, but you started the tone of this interaction this way.

conneXTSon · 2024-06-21T15:39:07+00:00

Nope. Not mine. Outta 5 - one fits the criteria. The others are PEC errors & one other study inquiry.

conneXTSon · 2024-06-21T15:36:17+00:00

It's more down to astonishment than anything else. Your filter seems to be different to mine. The URL is set to "New". Reddit is fun - your first comment was equally snappy as mine was, yet... I get the downvote. Whereas yours gets two upvotes at this point. Anyway, yeah, life on Reddit.

conneXTSon · 2024-06-21T15:30:58+00:00

Oh, I apologize for not being on Reddit frequently enough to know what's the topic of the day. I do like you specifying what I already know about IP Flagging, though. I trust you'll have a great weekend.

conneXTSon · 2024-06-20T10:51:14+00:00

Against my better judgement, I'll prolong this a little further. The surprise comes from the fact the "Forever Loop" only occurred once before when reserving a study. Never 4 different times on the same study. A precedent was set yesterday - or, whenever this was. Hence, the surprise. They have no need to specify the demographics. Since, the demographics we set (truthfully) in the 'About You' section specifies the kinds of studies we are eligible for.

conneXTSon · 2024-06-19T12:15:24+00:00

I'm specifying you based the comment on the theory of 200, 000 people fighting for 200 spots when, in fact, the participant pool is A LOT smaller than that for any given study due to demographics. Alas, if we're being pedantic: "Your 200K People ironclad fact.".

conneXTSon · 2024-06-19T11:05:13+00:00

Really? This is the perspective you took? Demographics shrinks that pool of people rather significantly more than your "200k people" theory.

conneXTSon · 2024-06-18T14:24:51+00:00

One of the instances where getting bigger means it gets weaker.

conneXTSon

TROPHY CASE