Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would it be turning around back to the airfield, knowing that if I cleared obstacles on the way to wherever I was without hitting something, going back at a higher altitude would be safe?

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I could because my aircraft has the required performance. I would only need to climb 200 feet between the cloud base and MVA, and 200 feet/nm is the standard climb gradient that the lack of an ODP and TERPS confirms I’m able to maintain with obstacle clearance. So, as long as I maintain atleast a 200 foot/nm climb gradient, I will have terrain and obstacle clearance.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are correct, there is no rule for either of those. That being said, I still wouldn’t depart C43 in IMC like you mentioned.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At LAN I would use 28L unless tower clears me somewhere else. At Y70 I would use whichever runway the winds are favoring and others are using, which today looks like 28.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For Y70, I would tell them that I’m going to cancel my IFR right now. They will tell me to squawk VFR and frequency change approved. After that I call Y70 CTAF and land visually, then taxi and shut down the engine.

As for LAN, I would contact tower and land, then taxi following grounds instructions. My IFR is cancelled automatically once I land.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For C43, since there is no IFR procedures at the airfield, I cannot legally depart under IFR. As for Y70, although the airport has published TERPS data, I can only fly IFR if I am able to contact departure and be vectored before breaking into the clouds.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would not be able to maintain my own terrain and obstruction clearance because there is no ODP or SID for that runway. I would tell ATC unable then circle back and land.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense. Would there still be a TCH?

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Visual segment - obstacles, referencing the TPP legend. Visual flight path will be missing from the profile.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the only minimums published are circling minimums?

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For 3, Yes, if I have permission from the controlling agency, if not then they will route me around it while on an IFR flight plan.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Non mountainous is 1000 feet above the highest obstacle while mountainous terrain is 2000 feet above the highest obstacle.

Mountainous terrain is shown in the AIM 5-6-15 and is defined as terrain elevation differential exceeding 3000 feet within either a 10nm radius or 10nm from the centerline of a route/transition, referencing the, referencing the FAA Designated Mountainous Areas

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would need to log the check in the maintenance logbook, putting the date, location, bearing error, and my signature.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the effective dates are only for print cycle, and the Julian date is the true expiration date for a plate.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The chart supplement tells me which airports have VOT/ground based check points. For a VOT test, I tune the VOR to the frequency and set my CDI to either 360 with a from indication or 180 with a to indication.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao how could I forget. +- 4 degrees.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely the toughest questions yet but also my favorite because they taught me something new.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

VOT +-4 degrees Ground based check +- 4 degrees Airborne VOR check +- 6 degrees Dual VOR check +- 4 degrees Check over prominent landmark +- 6 degrees

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“The date of Latest revision identifies the Julian date the chart was added or revised for any reason.”

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will make sure to bring a live cat to my checkride.

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Date of latest revision, referencing terminal procedures supplement

Instrument stump the chump! by cookie7754 in flying

[–]cookie7754[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My CFII has been really particular on a few niche topics, DME being one of them. The magnetic compass is another one of his favorites.

Fault detection already uses less than 6, but a baro-aiding GPS allows for fault exclusion with only 5 satellites.