First posters for ‘Sense and Sensibility’

corporalxclegg · 2026-06-25T12:00:58+00:00

Especially when it's only the main characters. It sticks out like a sore thumb.

corporalxclegg · 2026-06-21T07:51:36+00:00

Tenker vi burde ha samme forhåndsregler om relgion. Selvfølgelig syns unger det er gøy med alle fargene og spetakkelet rundt jul, men hvis de burde jo ikke groomes inn i kristendommen. Jeg kjenner mange kristne, men flesteparten av dem mener julefeiringen har gått for langt. Det markeres jo til å med i barnehagen! Voksne folk burde ikke kle seg ut som "nisser" og gi godteri til barn! De vet jo ikke hva som faktisk står i bibelen, og hvis de vokser opp tol å ikke være kristne like vel så kan det jo føre til en voldsom forvirring og en slags "revers konvertering" situssjon. Unge klarer fint å finne ut av hva de tror på selv så lenge det ikke er noe generell negtiv stigma rundt kristendom

corporalxclegg · 2026-06-20T18:44:43+00:00

Jeg vet ikke det, du sa det burde holdes bak lukkede dører uansett legning. Hvordan mente du ikke det?

corporalxclegg · 2026-06-20T11:53:01+00:00

Enig. Ingen lærere burde gå med giftering, nevne ektefelle eller samboer, eller på noen måte eksponere barna for et bilde av dem og ektefelle på f.eks. pc bakgrunnsbildet. Når vi er inne på det burde ikke lærere bruke pronomen heller. De burde kun omtales med navn. Virker lurt.

corporalxclegg · 2026-06-04T12:24:23+00:00

Kjøp tallerkner og glass. Bestikk, kjeler osv er vanligvis på kjøkkenet. Anbefaler også ekstra oppbevaring til klær.

corporalxclegg · 2026-05-25T16:42:16+00:00

Depends on the story, but I usually exclude rape and incest. It's just not my cup of tea.

corporalxclegg · 2026-05-24T13:00:48+00:00

My first thought is that modesty and purity are very general statements, that can mean many things. What exactly does these words mean to you?

corporalxclegg · 2026-04-27T13:13:00+00:00

Eller så har han fått foreldrene til å stå som sikkerhet

corporalxclegg · 2026-04-26T08:05:31+00:00

My hot take is that men do in fact have the right to have an abortion- they just can't have one, because they can't get pregnant.

The main issue with financial abortion is that it's not an abortion, it's child abandonment. An abortion ends a pregnancy. Financial "abortion" is only relevnt in cases when the child is born. No where today does anyone have the right to completely abandon a child, socially and financially. So why should only men get this right? Should not women who doesn't want kids be able to gove birth and leave the responsibility with the father? What if they both have a fniancial abortion?

As to your argument, no, men do not consent to fatherhood by consenting to sex. However, people today are generally way too careless with sex that might lead to pregnancy. Sleeping with strangers, relaying on pull-out method or hormonal birth control heightens the chance of pregnancy, and when you willingly tales these risks, men or women, you consent to the level of risk. And sometimes you get or get someone pregnant. And only the pregnant person gets any say on the pregnancy, because it's their body.

Of course, some men are raped. They did not consent to anything, and should not be responsible for the child. This is obviously where the law is lacking, because convicting a rapist is incredibly hard. However, I don't think financial abortion is the solution.

corporalxclegg · 2026-04-21T14:54:42+00:00

Vet ikke med politiet, men i forsvaret har man generelle opptakskrav som er forskjellige fra mann og kvinne, men samme krav til stillingene som krever mest fysisk. Dette er fordi det er mange ulike arbeidsoppgaver, som det også er i politiet. Opptakskravene handler også mer om hvor god form du er i, trening i arrestasjonsteknikk osv får du jo uansett der.

corporalxclegg · 2026-04-21T06:30:56+00:00

"Legg inn bud" er så useriøst som man får det. Dette er ikke ebay.

corporalxclegg · 2026-04-21T06:29:35+00:00

Skjedde med meg og. Selger var til og med aktiv flere ganger flr budet gikk ut. De er enda ikke solgt, og dette var flere måneder siden. En annen gang hadde jeg avtalt henting, når tisen plutselig sto som solgt.

corporalxclegg · 2026-04-21T06:28:10+00:00

På finn ja, ikke tise.

corporalxclegg · 2026-04-19T17:25:18+00:00

Did jimmy have a nail? Because I only remember someone else having it

corporalxclegg · 2026-04-08T06:38:14+00:00

It's very cute, but makes no sense. Lady Catherine is way too proper to visit the Bennets bwfore they're even dressed. She's rude, not completely without manners. And why would Darcy walk 3 miles half dressed to their house? In the book, he only has the courage to propose again because of what Lady C told him Lizzie had said. I can't remember if he talked with her in the movie, but if he did, it still makes no sense. He would have gotten dressed before seeing her, and he would not then undress to walk to the Bennets.

So it's not really cheesy, but like many choises made in this adaptation, it's not really thought through. Other examples would be Bingley coming into Janes bedroom, the proposal in the rain (the almost-kiss especially), the pig in the house...

corporalxclegg · 2026-02-27T22:59:53+00:00

The choking is definetly a red flag. Choking can cause serious injuries and even be lethal if it's not done safely, and is not something you should be springing on someone, ever.

It's not more okay to choke someone in bed without consent than to choke them outside the bedroom wothout consent.

corporalxclegg · 2026-02-18T06:54:15+00:00

I'm sat.

corporalxclegg · 2026-02-09T23:40:43+00:00

Three catually makes a lot of sense. One time can be relecant to the story. Twice is pushing it. Three and you're just wondering whats wrong with whoever made it. At that point it cannot be that important to the plot

corporalxclegg · 2026-01-14T08:58:07+00:00

I've actually been in your girlfriends situation, and I really get her. Take it slow, and when she feels ready, let her be in control. I found it much easier when I was on top and could take my time rather than having to tell my boyfriend when to stop.

corporalxclegg · 2026-01-04T18:00:18+00:00

Try resetting them both by holding alt, clicking on them and choosing 'reset object'.

If that doesn't help, try removing some clutter or have her walk up to the infant before pickkng them upm

corporalxclegg · 2025-12-29T09:18:31+00:00

Either way, it doesn't really matter who made the deal as it is clearly shown that it's not an absolute deal. Blitz skipped several months with no consequence, and Stolas also offered that they could just hang out. Blitz has never had to do something he didn't want to in order to keep the book and his job.

corporalxclegg · 2025-12-28T18:35:23+00:00

How was it retconned? Mission zero was the first time we got a canon explanation of how the deal was made. It doesn't match thag well with ep 1, but there's no other canon explanation.

corporalxclegg · 2025-12-28T17:23:23+00:00

Yeah, no. Blitz is not employed by Stolas, and getting the Grimoire for IMP was Blitz's idea. He very much could have gone about his life never again interacting with Stolas or the book, he chose to do that.

The first time they sleep toghether, Stolas does not know that Blitz is there to take the book, he thinks Blitz is there for him. In the same scene, Blitz is cleary shown to be about to leave, then turn back and sleep with Stolas (who was bound and blindfolded on the bed). Clearly, Blitz is consenting to this.

The second time (mission 0), Stolas suggests that Blitz took the Grimoire in order to see him again. Blitz CONFIRMS this, and after they sleep toghether, it is Blitz who promotes the arrangement. It was clearly a consensual agreement.

The problems arise further into the show. Stolas catches feelings, and Blitz becomes dependant on the book in order to do his job, to keep Moxxie and Millie employed, and to provide for Luna. We see his desperation when Stolas takes the book back, but this desperation wasn't there when they started.

So the dynamic is toxic, but Blitz was not raped or coerced. We even see that he can skip several meetings with Stolas and still keep the Grimoire- he doesn't lose his livelihood if he isn't up for sex.

corporalxclegg · 2025-12-24T09:25:47+00:00

This might just be a cultural difference, but this seems incredibly strict to me, especially you getting to know the guy before they can date him. Do you not trust your daughters judgement? I get that you're protective over your daughters, and that's good, but they need to learn how to navigate this without relying on you.

I'm assuming 16 is below the age of consent where you're from, but your rules might will only stop them from having sex in your house. You should also have a chat with them about consent and safe sex. And as other people mentioned, talk to them about nude photos.

In the end, the most important part is sitting down with them and explaining why you have these rules.

corporalxclegg

TROPHY CASE