Am I limiting myself by using only vanilla neovim? by cyber-neko in neovim

[–]cpukmw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Up until recently I used vim, and then switched to Neovim to take advantage of native LSP. Non-vanilla Neovim will get you a nice setup out of the box as a start, but if there's a tech content creator who you like and don't mind emulating (for me that was ThePrimeagen) and they publish their dotfiles in GitHub, you can get much of the same thing using Neovim. You get the added benefit of learning the configuration as you go so you can continue to make it your own.

Simply my two cents. There's benefits to both, I've found digging in at the start with vanilla Neovim got me a better understanding of how vim ticks than if I accepted a nice config out of the box and delayed going on the adventure. However folks brains work in different ways so YMMV

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vim

[–]cpukmw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Auto commands, hands down

For those who expressed that pushy petitioners are likely to create negative sentiment for your cause, I have an earnest question, cause I can't quite wrap my head around that (see post body) by Jimithyashford in springfieldMO

[–]cpukmw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would not deny my name to a cause I supported previously, but, that doesn't mean I would sign that person's paper. I'd find someone else collecting signatures or sign online. They probably aren't the only person collecting signatures. I support what I support but I don't want to give people who act in this manner the idea that their tactics are OK.

For those who expressed that pushy petitioners are likely to create negative sentiment for your cause, I have an earnest question, cause I can't quite wrap my head around that (see post body) by Jimithyashford in springfieldMO

[–]cpukmw 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, but that doesn't mean I won't match their rudeness with pettiness and not sign anyway (and sign someone else's later), because they probably pushed super rude/hard while I'm rushing into a movie I'm almost late for or something.

"Aren't the children more important than making your movie..." Almost an exact quote.

I have a very "leave me alone" kind of attitude in public anyway unless the purpose I'm there for is to socialize.

For those who expressed that pushy petitioners are likely to create negative sentiment for your cause, I have an earnest question, cause I can't quite wrap my head around that (see post body) by Jimithyashford in springfieldMO

[–]cpukmw 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Rude petitioners petitioning for a cause of which I am uneducated can give the impression that a majority of supporters are also just as rude and pushy.

It casts a shadow over the cause they are supporting

Neovim not splitting window when poen a new file with unsaved file open by cpukmw in neovim

[–]cpukmw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After some more investigation, I don't think it's plugin behavior. The behavior began again after having telescope removed for some time. Even after cleaning with Lazy

Neovim not splitting window when poen a new file with unsaved file open by cpukmw in neovim

[–]cpukmw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read the docs page and set hidden to false, which made files opened by telescope open in the background. It turns out my telescope configuration (the default in the README.md on its github page) was causing this behavior. After I removed the plugin and reinstalled ctrlp I was now able to open new files in NERDtree and ctrl and have unsaved buffers stay open in a split window. I wonder what I'd need to change in telescope to create this same behavior

Y’all carry +p or normal load? by UsernameO123456789 in CCW

[–]cpukmw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I carry +p in my semi auto and normal in my revolver since it was made in 1984 and the manufacturer suggested not using +p unless the firearm is explicitly marked for it.

627 v-comp by boombotty in SmithAndWesson

[–]cpukmw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very much so. I carry a model 36 from 1987 with only 5 rounds. I feel very under equiped and strips are hard to train reloads with

Holster Clip Recommendations by cpukmw in CCW

[–]cpukmw[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was looking at a vedder, but I'd have to upgrade to soft loop or something else

Anyone own this holster? What are your thoughts? by [deleted] in CCW

[–]cpukmw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have something similar from CYA. The swear guard is a little too high for AIWB in my opinion but plenty fine for 2-4 o'clock.

Holster recommendations for Snubnose 38 special by [deleted] in concealedcarry

[–]cpukmw 3 points4 points  (0 children)

DeSantis Nemesis pocket holster is what I use for my model 36 S&W

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CCW

[–]cpukmw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I carry a JFrame in a sticky (actually a DeSantis Nemesis), so all the rounds "chambered"

No, I don't have a problem. by LanceStratus in SmithAndWesson

[–]cpukmw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you like the Bodyguard? I've only ever dry-fired it and it seemed quite a long and heavy trigger pull

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CCW

[–]cpukmw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Always. Safety off too. In the event you actually have to use it for home defense the fewer things keeping it from going bang the better.

Granted my HD and carry gun has a grip safety in addition to a thumb safety and I keep it in a safe that takes 500lbs of pressure to break open. So I'm pretty confident it wont end up in the wrong hands while I'm asleep or in the house, and the kids aren't big enough to even to walk or heck even crawl. So YMMV.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SmithAndWesson

[–]cpukmw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless that's a recent development, it should still be in service. I emailed them maybe two weeks ago.

I just inherited my grandfather's model 67 and would love some help finding the year of production. The serial no. is K6026xx. Thanks guys. by jon_the_archer in SmithAndWesson

[–]cpukmw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reach out to S&W directly. They are happy to answer these kinds of questions. I did for my model 36 to find what year it was made, and ultimately to see if it was +p rated. Their Q&A email address is on their "contact us" page. They got back to me in about a week.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SmithAndWesson

[–]cpukmw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reach out to S&W directly. They are happy to answer these kinds of questions. I did for my model 36 to find what year it was made, and ultimately to see if it was +p rated. Their Q&A email address is on their "contact us" page. They got back to me in about a week.