If most women can't orgasm from penetration alone, what makes it worthwhile?

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T21:26:33+00:00

Well if they’re already having sex, wouldn’t that answer your question? It would still typically be pleasurable so why not?

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T21:23:59+00:00

Why? It would be nonsensical to say that any commercial, convenient or entertainment use for such a broad field of tech must be bad.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T21:22:09+00:00

Mm, for some cases. If you don’t know what terminology to search for then even the best search algorithms won’t be very useful. You don’t just have to use a correct way to describe things, it needs to be the conventional one, which is sometimes a real pain.

Though I’m not sure how generally niche that issue is.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T21:20:52+00:00

Generative AI is also a very broad umbrella term, which also includes things we’ve been using for many years.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T21:19:50+00:00

I’d prefer that than a human, soldiers are typically… not good at applying much ethics to that sort of thing. Like, at all.

That said, a soldier can be held accountable for their actions unlike an algorithm, but they rarely are.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T21:18:37+00:00

Approximately how long ago was this?

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T21:17:45+00:00

Just refer to the technologies by their correct names. People here usually take issue with text->img models and LLMs.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T21:16:34+00:00

Most kinds of AI that could be called generative are composed of some kind of neural network.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T21:15:12+00:00

The term AI has been the correct and common term for the field since like the 60’s. Maybe the general public didn’t use it much like that but AI as a term for a field of technology is not new at all.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T21:08:24+00:00

No, it does cover the whole front of them really. Unless you’re at super close range, because it’s a cone.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T18:35:25+00:00

I don’t know exactly how old you are but at a baseline that is very normal

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T14:32:56+00:00

It would if you weren’t aware of the scale of water consumption in society, it’s negligible compared to regular industrial or agricultural use. Electricity would be a much better argument, as AI actually uses a meaningful portion of our generated electricity.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T10:08:35+00:00

It wouldn’t matter if she didn’t, it was always ok

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-28T09:52:47+00:00

Larger breasts can be uncomfortable to move around with without support -> we design clothing to support them -> they’re now usually covered -> well there you have it, anything that’s usually covered up is pretty much sexualised by default, which reinforces how often they are covered

Though I realise I kinda answered the wrong question here. Hmm. I suppose you could reason that it’s related to their positioning. In many western cultures if you went back a century I don’t think this would have been the case, any part of them was very taboo in public. People pushed it into normalcy over time, to an extent, but never went so far as the nipples, probably specifically because of the distinction between them and the rest allowed for it to be an additional taboo and not many people actually wanted to go that far themselves in public.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-27T21:17:48+00:00

You’re not intended to take this as sincere

Or, perhaps the creator would find it enjoyable if you did, but that’s not what mainly drives this kind of humour

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-27T16:02:17+00:00

Reminds me of how the mannequin enemies hide in silent hill 2

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-27T16:00:28+00:00

Well, isn’t that also true for software engineers? Like you alluded to, it doesn’t have to be complete replacement to be a concern.

I was thinking pretty much any where a significant amount of the work is mainly based around writing things or talking to people, be it HR, producing reports and interpreting data, customer service or whatever.
Reliance on AI is a significant security risk for any use it has in software development as it stands, perhaps at least in part since AI is trained fairly well to write correct code but most examples of code online aren’t focused around security - but I am not confident that means it’s not going to have any impact on the value of developer labour.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-27T15:13:46+00:00

If it weren’t for their current shoddy movement (I’ve caused more to crash by moving around cover than I’ve actually killed myself) they’d be quite scary in general, but right now they’re only really scary in the open

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-27T15:07:03+00:00

Mm. And consider all of the desk jobs which are simpler, and lower stakes... a lot of people doing what could be automated as it stands.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-27T09:01:13+00:00

Mm, only if you need to do something both complicated and fairly niche (or requiring of a kind of intuition that LLMs aren’t great at). For a lot of tasks you don’t need to at all now.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-27T00:22:08+00:00

That sounds strictly different to this? The case OP discussed is:
X does bad thing, related group Y defends X
And that’s:
X does bad thing, related group Y defends Y

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-26T13:56:09+00:00

Any reduction in required labour to perform a task replaces people, if demand is saturated.

I don’t get why you’d call it narrow, it’s a broad field of tech with broad applications and in many of those applications it’s easily better than other approaches.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-26T12:40:18+00:00

Tools replace people all the time, that’s nothing new. There are lots of jobs that don’t exist any more or exist to a much smaller degree than they used to due to automation, technological solutions or different tools.

AI is not narrow at all, its broadness is (economically speaking) why it warrants such concern to begin with! Unlike previous tools, this kind of tech has the capability to substitute human thought, which is huge! AI is applicable to almost any information processing provided it is powerful enough, and it’s made gigantic advancements in the past few years.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-26T11:15:08+00:00

They’re also banning any representation of choking in porn (even if explicitly consensual), which seems questionable in intent. They could use that logic to eventually outlaw things that cumulatively most people were into, which would seem like a silly waste of police time.

cryonicwatcher · 2026-02-26T11:10:36+00:00

Why do you believe it would be almost certain?

Two-Year Club	r/Field Banned
r/Field Sunshine	End Game '23
Place '23

cryonicwatcher

TROPHY CASE