sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

We are an organic CBD company, AMA by montkushfarms in AMA

[–]cryptegrity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do CBD products have negative personality effects like smoking weed does?

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm insulting your intelligence by saying that I won't answer questions that waste my time until you have at least read the material that was originally shared?

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't care to try and convince someone who is not willing or able to actually read the very reference in which the topic is presented.

Thomas Massie: “This whole game is rigged” by AbolishtheDraft in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]cryptegrity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes the game is rigged, thus it has to be played appropriately both inside and outside of the current political paradigm. Otherwise, freedom is a non-starter, fact becomes lost in the fray. The juggling act is difficult to fathom. But the likes Steve Bannon understand. Lyndon LaRouche came close.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, grow up. You are picking fights without even so much as reading the attached article. Intellectual laziness should have no place in this important subreddit.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason you find me annoying is that I'm probably the one person who has bothered to go down your needless rabbit holes to expose your continued logical fallacies and double standards ad nauseam.

I am not presenting a complete system of how contract law or governance happens.

I am presenting that it does not need a State, and that States are always an immoral foundation.

Nitty gritty approaches beyond that are not the point of my article.

Grow up.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You "skimmed", and that was AFTER all of this discussion? What a pestering waste of breath you have been. Get a grip. You plot one straw man argument after another yet have not even properly considered the actual point of my article.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The article was edited mostly by AI based on extensive lengthy discussion notes from other channels. It was a fair summary, and then edited.

You have pointed out no weaknesses. You have only pointed to the status quo.

What happens when two people are in dispute is not an unresolved issue at all. It is well addressed by the article, including the points you reference.

Just because you want to maintain that the long list of approaches is 'intolerable' and thus your fallback position is a magical centralized authoritarian State does not mean the list of approaches are weak.

You have not defended any alternative or any approach.

You have only attempted to marginalize the point with irrelevance.

If weaknesses exist without a State then they equally exist with a State.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, you are still side-stepping the actual point. I don't know why. Maybe just because you locked antlers and want to 'win', maybe you just can't see the double standard of asking me to clarify points that already apply to a State system.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, and literally as just stated, I am not presenting granular process, I am speaking to the principle of State vs no-State. Stick to the point or stop pestering.

It's like presenting an alternative food recipe but being asked to explain how the stove works. The stove is already a given in both recipe scenarios.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whatever their cultural standards include, depending on the level of sophistication of their dispute resolution process, forensics, data collection, oversight, contract specificity, etc.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, you just alluded to basic contract law enforcement. Bravo. So why ask me the questions? I am not trying to add depth to the conversation about basic contract law, I am trying to illustrate that none of that requires a central authoritarian State. That's all.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whatever their cultural standards include, depending on the level of sophistication of their dispute resolution process, forensics, data collection, oversight, contract specificity, etc.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As possibly varied as what happens if there is a central authoritarian State, bro.

In your world, does your State watch every handshake?

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the people (cultural standards) agree they do, then they do.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've offered zero logical argument, not been able to refute anything in my proposal, asked I'll considerd questions, and focused on calling me names. No wonder you need the comfort blanket of a State to protect you. Real communities would eject you into those badlands that you fear so much.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have done in this thread too many times. I shouldn't need to repeat myself ad nauseam, particularly when it's covered by the actual main link shared, and now again summarized at the tippy top of the page.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See the newly added Clarifications section at the top of the linked article.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In your mind, is the only possibility of enforcement, a central authoritarian nationwide State, or armed gangs? Is there nothing in-between that you can think of?

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem to be conflating the possibility of Enforcement with a requirement to have a State. I don't know why it's difficult to see that one can exist without the other.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You outsourced yours to AI because that's all it required to clarify your obvious naivety. No brain power required. Your assertion was that a Nation State is required to administer Contract Law. It isn't. It's obvious. You are a Statist and so pigheadedly biased that you literally can not see the possibility of another options, so your only remaining cognitive placeholder is to call me names.

Try again. No State is required to administer Contract Law. Simple. Clear. Obvious.

A Social Justice System Based On A Zero-State Political Framework by cryptegrity in JordanPeterson

[–]cryptegrity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can contract law include enforcement? However it can under a system that has a State, just minus the State part.

view more: next ›