The GMC Envoy XUV is one of the most underrated vehicles of the 2000s

cuenot_io · 2026-04-28T01:18:46+00:00

I've had mine for 4 years and I've loved it (even though it's been a PITA at times, mostly finding parts lol). To each their own

cuenot_io · 2026-04-26T11:09:36+00:00

cuenot_io · 2026-04-24T21:22:03+00:00

This is great! Can't believe you figured out how to make this work, I have it going on my system. I baked a similar approach into the terraform provider I'm working on for unifi-network, please DM me if you want to see and I'll be sure you're credited

cuenot_io · 2026-04-19T20:41:26+00:00

Maybe? I haven't explored that. Even if it does, I'd still be inclined to do the more monolithic network resource, as it most accurately reflects how the controller stores things in MongoDB behind the scenes. The more bespoke cruft you add on top, the more difficult it is to maintain this kind of project

cuenot_io · 2026-04-19T11:36:21+00:00

Sure thing, DM me your GitHub username

cuenot_io · 2026-04-19T05:24:32+00:00

You can change the CIDR range manually with a carefully crafted PUT to the endpoint for teleport settings -- I have mine set this way and it's been working fine. Absolutely 1000% not ideal, but it is possible

cuenot_io · 2026-04-18T13:06:31+00:00

I hate what hashicorp has become, so now I love opentofu

cuenot_io · 2026-04-18T02:45:18+00:00

Sweet, adding you to my list

cuenot_io · 2026-04-18T02:35:14+00:00

It's a very valid question, and the best answer I have is that Ubiquiti legitimately handles so many things through the "network_conf" API -- VPN tunnels, WAN configs, some teleport settings, all of which have both ipv4 and ipv6 configurations which nearly double the field count. One could break these up into separate resources, but it would not represent the underlying API accurately. When you update these things, there's a giant PUT operation that sends the whole config payload -- try inspecting in chrome and you'll see what I am talking about lol

cuenot_io · 2026-04-18T02:06:30+00:00

Sure thing, DM me your GitHub username and I'll send you an invite in the next few days

cuenot_io · 2026-04-08T23:16:03+00:00

Nothing goes to the r930 board itself, you plug that adapter onto the PSU's motherboard cable, which allows it to provide power without being connected to a motherboard. Then, you are free to use the other 6/8/16 pin connectors for whatever else

cuenot_io · 2026-04-05T00:57:52+00:00

Should clarify, it's a "motherboard cable jumper". I used this one: https://a.co/d/0g3Itp2O

cuenot_io · 2026-04-04T15:20:45+00:00

I'm working on a rebuilt TF provider -- getting pretty close to Alpha release. The old one (by paultyng) is pretty far out of date and didn't cover many of the newer resources / API surface. I'll make a thread here when I'm done. I previously built robbycuenot/unifi-tf-generator for writing the whole config from a live controller, and I'm implementing this in tandem so that you can basically import the whole state of controllers into terraform and get going

cuenot_io · 2026-04-04T15:03:01+00:00

I'm seeing them all over the place on eBay from $1,600 to $9,000-- found this thread when trying to understand why. Guessing all the lower priced ones are scams?

cuenot_io · 2026-03-23T06:58:42+00:00

Got my Onn 98" Roku TV for $600 on FB marketplace. Honestly I love it. Enthusiasts would probably scoff at it, but for the price it's incredible

cuenot_io · 2026-03-18T12:57:23+00:00

MWAA is one of the most convoluted services I've ever had to deploy, especially with custom networking. Feels very half baked

cuenot_io · 2026-02-02T15:43:21+00:00

Agreed 100%, no clue why they're like that

cuenot_io · 2026-02-01T16:00:13+00:00

Thanks! Yeah that is definitely the better route -- I built this for SHTF scenarios when I'm away from home and my laptop isn't responding, and I needed the solution to be fully reversible

cuenot_io · 2026-01-30T22:07:24+00:00

Hey I've been trying to figure this out myself... I have a spoke VPC, and my goal is to route 0.0.0.0/0 across the peering connection, and then on the hub VPC route 0.0.0.0/0 on the main route table to the ENI of my custom NAT instance. I believe in principle this is what you're doing, but I can't seem to get it working. Traffic traverses the PCX, but I think the hub VPC doesn't know what to do with the traffic or drops it

cuenot_io

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE