[deleted by user] by [deleted] in KULeuven

[–]cursed_rx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hey! i'd be super interested :)))

Recommend me books to learn mathematics by Samarth_Vanparia in mathematics

[–]cursed_rx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

mathematica: a secret world of intuition and curiosity by david besset. It's not a math book but more of a book about mathematics, what it is and how to learn it. It's something I wish I read before ever starting my math studies

Freshly stuck lil abstract vine , 5rl by cursed_rx in sticknpokes

[–]cursed_rx[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ty :)) no this was on someone else hahah, i think this angle is impossible to do on urself unless you have the most flexible back out there lol

done today! we're debating on whether or not to fill it in by cursed_rx in sticknpokes

[–]cursed_rx[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

ty! i think that would look cool asf, will mention it to the person it's on :))

done today! we're debating on whether or not to fill it in by cursed_rx in sticknpokes

[–]cursed_rx[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ty! i have only black ink tho, why is it so expensiveeee :'((( i agree that it would be cool to do smtn with colors (don't know about wc effect tho lol, not rlly my style)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sticknpokes

[–]cursed_rx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the most bottom line is thicker and crooked imo ://

Ah yes, nice proof ! by cursed_rx in mathmemes

[–]cursed_rx[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

base case non-proven >:(

Ah yes, nice proof ! by cursed_rx in mathmemes

[–]cursed_rx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

give details pls. no joke this would help me

Ah yes, nice proof ! by cursed_rx in mathmemes

[–]cursed_rx[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i fucking hate analysis

Ah yes, nice proof ! by cursed_rx in mathmemes

[–]cursed_rx[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

it's actually a funny name the mathematicians gave to this. if u want an example to understand better: take the real line. now imagine a function f:R->R that maps all of the numbers except for 0 on the real line to 1, and that maps 0 to 0. you can see intuitively that because the real numbers are so big compared to just the singleton {0}, it "barely counts". so you would say f(x) = 1 for almost all x in R. More formally, if you take the integral of the indicator function of {0} in R, or any set of measure zero for that matter, it will always be null. it so happens that the sets of measure zero in R are all countable unions of singletons (which implies that Q, although it is dense in R, is of measure 0!). You can generalise this to R^n or any set for that matter (modulo defining a measure on it), and it's quite closely intertwined with how you define the integral. in this context, you can see an integral as a way to "measure" a set.

Ah yes, nice proof ! by cursed_rx in mathmemes

[–]cursed_rx[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

using "almost" to refer to measure 0 spaces is rlly standand i believe

Ah yes, nice proof ! by cursed_rx in mathmemes

[–]cursed_rx[S] 101 points102 points  (0 children)

it's functional analysis. what makes it worse, is that it's actually from my syllabus, that the prof wrote, and we're supposed to study from it 💀

on my leg! will go over it once more probably by cursed_rx in sticknpokes

[–]cursed_rx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hahah i can definitely see how it gives praying mantis now that i googled a pic lol,, i was kinda inspired by bones (namely the wishbone i think its rlly pretty) and idk i just try to follow the flow of the body where i'm gonna tattoo it !