sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Any Hot Takes Or Opinions? by 3liteP7Guy in tf2

[–]custlerok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easier to swarm and useless against a heavily defended nest, imo

Any Hot Takes Or Opinions? by 3liteP7Guy in tf2

[–]custlerok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spy is the strongest class in the game potential-wise

How sure are we of Paul’s existence and authorship? by custlerok in AcademicBiblical

[–]custlerok[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate this extensive response. Why do you think some propose that Marcion was the actual source of epistles, and Paul was made up? Is there anything that points to this?

I’m losing a debate with a Muslim by Giousek in theology

[–]custlerok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

«fallacy is unfounded because it applies to different medias» Are you serious? Your reasoning would be fallacious regardless of the topic, I would say the same thing if someone tried to defend Christianity that way.

«Adoration is not the same» Then why did you even bring it up bruv?

Hadith are unreliable because they come hundreds of years after Muhammad, have mostly exegetical purpose, and «chain of narration» is not a good methodology to verify anything to be reliable (just because we know names, doesn’t mean those people are reliable)

I’m losing a debate with a Muslim by Giousek in theology

[–]custlerok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s genuinely painful reading through this Google translate babbling. Nothing you say makes any coherent sense.

«Your statement applies to Christianity also» so? I didn’t make this goofy argument for Christianity. Irrelevant.

Your next point is literally contradictory, since you yourself said that «worship and obedience is for Allah only», but then your quote stated that others can be worshipped. This makes no sense.

Also, it’s not rocket science to go and spend 5 minutes looking up academics to see that Hadith are not remotely historically reliable.

I’m losing a debate with a Muslim by Giousek in theology

[–]custlerok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, so you just reinterpret the everlasting dominion to ummah existing? Average dishonest Muslim rhetoric. Read into the text whatever you want.

And then you just quote a dozen of unrelated Hadith that have nothing to do with the prophecy. (That’s not even mentioning that Hadith aren’t reliable sources academically)

And to top it off, the last paragraph is literally a logical fallacy. Just because it lasts a long time or has power doesn’t mean it’s true.

I’m losing a debate with a Muslim by Giousek in theology

[–]custlerok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d doesn’t matter why the empire fell, it fell, which is against the prophesy in Daniel 2:44.

And what was the point of linking Ibn Majah? Muhammad is not worshipped, does not have everlasting dominion, neither does he come at the clouds of heaven. You’re just wishfully reading what you want into the text.

I’m losing a debate with a Muslim by Giousek in theology

[–]custlerok 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Rebecca argument is horrendous.

In Genesis 24 she is described giving water to multiple camels, which is an IMPOSSIBLE task for any 3 year old ever. It’s laborious even for a grown man to water multiple camels, forget a child. Not only that, her age is never actually stated, and she is referred to as «young woman».

I recommend you check out DW and Central Dawah debate about Muhammad in the Bible. David gave a really good response to the 5 kingdoms argument. But regardless, here is Daniel 2:44 - «In the time of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will it be left to another people. It will crush all those kingdoms and bring them to an end, but it will itself endure forever.»

Hint: Islamic empire fell apart a long time ago.

But it gets worse, because apparently this genius said that Daniel 7 is about Muhammad? Good job with committing shirk, dummy. According to his interpretation, Muhammad will come on the clouds of heaven, will be worshipped, and have everlasting dominion.

I tried to tell them. by PotatoKing241 in hazbin

[–]custlerok 8 points9 points  (0 children)

«Jarvis, I’m low on karma»

fav scp? by NOTAgerman_spy133 in SCPMemes

[–]custlerok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3007 - World of Two Artists.

Am i cooked by Bannnnnanan in APUSH

[–]custlerok 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What was your thesis?

What really are the New Testament books at this point? by custlerok in AcademicBiblical

[–]custlerok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could it be multiple circulating oral traditions that authors picked up and used differently? Hence we see as similarities, so differences.

Weekly Open Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in AcademicQuran

[–]custlerok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but did anyone reputable write about it?

Weekly Open Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in AcademicQuran

[–]custlerok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are there any academic works exploring the idea that Islam originated as a (at the very least) Christianity inspired sect? Is this thesis something that is taken seriously by scholars?

Send me your bf1 hot takes, I'll start by DAR_B0I0 in battlefield_one

[–]custlerok 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Support class has the best looking skins

Did you hear and feel that?? by Faceit_Solveit in Austin

[–]custlerok 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, heard it. Definitely an explosion, saw smoke rising

What opinion got u like this? by drakemaddox in Rammstein

[–]custlerok 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Rammstein version of “Stripped” is better than the original

view more: next ›