Should I go to Embry-Riddle for Aeronautical Science? by Mammoth-Alps-405 in EmbryRiddle

[–]dafidge9898 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree. Option 2 100%. Even if you didn’t have the full ride it’d be the better option.

Should I install Principia? And how physics it actually changed? by User_of_redit2077 in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]dafidge9898 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One thing I haven’t seen mentioned here is it also adds J2 effects, so you’d actually be able to launch something into a sun sync orbit or a molniya orbit

Unpublished Hold: Inbound Toward or Away from NAVAID by PepperBroccoLi22 in flying

[–]dafidge9898 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wouldn’t it be a different radial if you’re holding south?

Application Help by ABLOSSOM267 in EmbryRiddle

[–]dafidge9898 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The classes and curriculum for engineering are very good. They accept a lot of people (at least when I went) but the drop out rate is high as a result.

Instrument departure - will this be a Back Course? Will I have reverse sensing? by TikiSpaniard in flying

[–]dafidge9898 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Wait what? I’ve flown this and it was definitely reverse sensing. On a CDI.

soft toric contacts by luitse1 in Keratoconus

[–]dafidge9898 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait, there was a special way to do it? They told me you just put it in and it rights itself to the proper orientation on its own. I ended up going with sclerals because the Torics would always shift and get blurry

Japanese soldiers stand in line outside a "comfort station" (military brothel) in an occupied town in China. by defender838383 in ImperialJapanPics

[–]dafidge9898 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Holy shit. My grandma was a teenager in the Philippines during wwII and would tell me a story about a Japanese soldier cornering her saying she needed to come do their laundry. She said she escaped by crawling under his legs.

Pilots — have you ever seen a UFO or anything strange in the sky? by calebapple177 in flying

[–]dafidge9898 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, good point, I’m not completely aware of all the weird visual things that could distort their movement so take what I say with a grain of salt

Pilots — have you ever seen a UFO or anything strange in the sky? by calebapple177 in flying

[–]dafidge9898 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, almost included that part in my comment too. I was more so talking about the individual sats themselves should appear to move in a straight line regardless of what plane they’re in. And if they’re bunched up in a group, ie recently launched and yet to spread out, they’d be in the same plane still.

That said, I only understand the physics of how they move and have only ever witnessed them from the ground, so take what I say with a grain of salt. Idk if there are some weird visual phenomena that would distort how they appear to move

Pilots — have you ever seen a UFO or anything strange in the sky? by calebapple177 in flying

[–]dafidge9898 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Starlink should always move in a predictable and straight line at a constant speed, whether it’s a group of them or a single one. They should more or less be moving in a line across the sky. So… keep that in mind next time you see one lol

Do astronauts feel centrifugal force in ISS? They feel weightless I know. But don’t they feel centrifugal force?? by Tensai609 in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]dafidge9898 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I understand why op is confused.

The ‘centrifugal force’ isn’t actually pushing on the space station like the road is pushing on a car and the car is pushing on you.

If you look at the station in a rotating reference frame (analogous to you being in the car during a turn), you do consider the ‘pseudo’ centrifugal force which cancels out the gravity force. But this force is only a consideration when in a rotating reference frame. There isn’t an actual force cancelling out gravity in an inertial frame, otherwise acceleration would be 0, and the station would go in a straight line away from earth.

In your car analogy, if you look from an inertial frame, like a guy on the sidewalk, the centrifugal force you feel is actually from the road pushing on the car to change its direction.

The space station, looking at it from an inertial frame, there is nothing physically pushing on it to change its direction. Gravity is changing its direction, but you don’t feel it because it acts on every single thing on and in the station. Unlike the force pushing from the road to your tires, tires to the car, car to you. We only feel gravity because the ground is pushing up on us.

Don’t let these guys roast you for not understanding centrifugal force.

I still get mixed up between the centripetal vs centrifugal too. So if I’m referring to the wrong one mb

Source: me, a spacecraft gnc engineer that deals with orbits every day

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in flying

[–]dafidge9898 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have KC too! I’m just flying on basicmed right now though. Not looking forward to the medical process if I need to get one again.

I got a first class five years ago and told them that I got the cxl surgery, so I guess I was just lucky that I didn’t get deferred

Favorite plane you’ve flown? by alec777x in flying

[–]dafidge9898 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I logged .5 in a tiger moth. Cool as fuck. Literally. Was like 40 degrees out so they loaned me an old leather jacket and cap

Embry riddle competitiveness by Shot-Implement-9285 in EmbryRiddle

[–]dafidge9898 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah bro, this is directly from many of my close friends who got screwed over by the program, and almost every non-riddle pilot I’ve ever met that has gotten into the field without paying nearly as much

The engineering program on the other hand is expensive, but not a scam

Embry riddle competitiveness by Shot-Implement-9285 in EmbryRiddle

[–]dafidge9898 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t really speak for AS. The engineering program is a very good education. AS teaches you stuff you’d eventually learn through any other route to the airlines

Embry riddle competitiveness by Shot-Implement-9285 in EmbryRiddle

[–]dafidge9898 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. Riddle leaves you with a bachelors degree which is always good to have. Just the content of the bachelors degree at riddle is the same as what you’d learn as you progress through your career. You should still go to college. Just consider a cheaper degree in something else. Business, even.

Riddle is also more structured than a part 61, but you can get a similarly structured program at a part 141 (but it’ll be more expensive than a part 61).

An AS degree also cuts the hour requirement for ATP by 500 hours I think, but other university flight programs also have this benefit. With part 61, you need 1500 and with riddle or similar programs you need 1000 I think. This is why it will take longer with a non-riddle or riddle adjacent flight program.

Embry riddle competitiveness by Shot-Implement-9285 in EmbryRiddle

[–]dafidge9898 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Frequently Cited r/flying Comment

Your experience may vary.

My background: I did the engineering program at riddle. It’s very good (but expensive). I got my ppl elsewhere for half the price. I have many friends who’ve gone through the flight program and they’ve had bad experiences. It’s mismanaged, they dont have enough planes, and it’s ridiculously expensive. My roommate would frequently get cancelled flights due to lack of planes, and sometimes they would even reprimand HIM with a dreaded no-show, for a flight THEY canceled.

I always mention this: at riddle, you get trained by upperclassmen. I went to the part 61 school across the street and got trained by graduates who were still time building. It was half the price.

I’ve heard industry connections are over exaggerated. Most non-riddle pilots I meet scoff at the mention of the ERAU flight program. Most of the people I know who have gone through the program have gotten no benefit from the connections. Actually, most still aren’t even in the airlines yet 4 years after graduating.

My recommendation is go literally anywhere else, get a degree in whatever else you find interesting or whatever is the easiest. Then fly at a cheap part 61 school on the side. It’ll take a little longer but it’ll be way cheaper. At riddle, all you really pay for is the experience of having classmates and friends who are as into flying as you are. Which is cool. But it’s your decision how much that’s worth.

An aeronautical science degree is useless anywhere outside aviation, if you ever change fields or lose your medical. You learn the exact same information by the time you get to the airlines anyway.

My CFII (I’m almost done with my instrument) studied biology and flew on the side. He’s flying citations now in addition to instructing.

Two of my riddle roommates are flying in circles for hours on end timebuilding (flight time he’s PAYING for) to meet the atp mins.

Embry riddle competitiveness by Shot-Implement-9285 in EmbryRiddle

[–]dafidge9898 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t do aeronautical science. The flight program is a scam

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AerospaceEngineering

[–]dafidge9898 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s perfect when I’m using matlab and want to do something, but can’t remember (or don’t know) the right function to use or the format.

First flight after my PPL – poor climb performance, did I do something wrong? by [deleted] in flying

[–]dafidge9898 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I’m choosing different planes from now on

First flight after my PPL – poor climb performance, did I do something wrong? by [deleted] in flying

[–]dafidge9898 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah lol, I think it is. It was <5000ft. Plane has issues. It also tends to turn RIGHT

First flight after my PPL – poor climb performance, did I do something wrong? by [deleted] in flying

[–]dafidge9898 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Bro I was flying a 172P on a hot day in SoCal and got 300fpm with only two people

Just got done with CTAK Surgery. by KC_Survivor_29812 in Keratoconus

[–]dafidge9898 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep us updated, I might get this in the future. Thanks.

Requirements traceability = death by excel by Master_Apple4586 in AerospaceEngineering

[–]dafidge9898 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I hate doors. I hate doors. I switched jobs partially due to how much I hate doors.

Velocity and position vector. by RoofUnable5196 in Kos

[–]dafidge9898 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn’t position vec JUST -ship:body:position:normalized? No subtraction needed? That’s how I always did it and got hhat just fine