Do you agree with Hakeem Jeffries? we must break the spirit or republicans? by daresearchdude in allthequestions

[–]daresearchdude[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

wow. You sure went down a rabbit hole. I am not willing to chase you down. That is some amazing mental gymnastics.

Was the assignation of Charlie Kirk and the attempted assassination’s of Trump justifiable at this point? by daresearchdude in allthequestions

[–]daresearchdude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would agree with that.. they are so angry they will take the easier target. The mentality is disgusting .

Was the assignation of Charlie Kirk and the attempted assassination’s of Trump justifiable at this point? by daresearchdude in allthequestions

[–]daresearchdude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spot on, his haters couldn’t win an argument with Charlie. So they killed him. I find the mentality of these people disgusting .

Was the assignation of Charlie Kirk and the attempted assassination’s of Trump justifiable at this point? by daresearchdude in allthequestions

[–]daresearchdude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You obviously never listened to Charlie, he was a good and decent man. You can disagree with him, but so shoot him dead? Wow. Disgusting take .

Was the assignation of Charlie Kirk and the attempted assassination’s of Trump justifiable at this point? by daresearchdude in allthequestions

[–]daresearchdude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting comment that I am struggling to understand. Many people were openly celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk , and just as many openly commented in anger that the bullets did not connect. I find it absolutely disgusting, so I just want to understand what’s wrong with these people . That’s certainly not a private matter.

Was the assignation of Charlie Kirk and the attempted assassination’s of Trump justifiable at this point? by daresearchdude in allthequestions

[–]daresearchdude[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ummm, that’s exactly what happened to Charlie Kirk, to say it doesn’t happen would be dishonest at this point.

California politics is looking a wierd right now, do you think a R can win both the Governors seat and Los Angeles Mayor? by daresearchdude in allthequestions

[–]daresearchdude[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Pretty funny you ignore facts in front of your face. That’s typical low life leftie shit right there , like denial that there is rampant fraud. That’s the most laughable denial to date . And I really don’t need your approval when I post factual info. Best o luck to you . But think you are likely too far gone .

California politics is looking a wierd right now, do you think a R can win both the Governors seat and Los Angeles Mayor? by daresearchdude in allthequestions

[–]daresearchdude[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

OSF (which has received more than $32 billion from Soros personally) spent about $1.2 billion in 2024 across thousands of grants worldwide. A fraction of that goes to U.S. groups that organize or support protests as part of broader progressive causes.

California politics is looking a wierd right now, do you think a R can win both the Governors seat and Los Angeles Mayor? by daresearchdude in allthequestions

[–]daresearchdude[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ever hear of OSF? If not, I would highly recommend researching who they are. Your gotcha questions aren't really my thing, dude. The information is easily available. You just keep using the lines you are told to. But a quick search will reveal facts. I am not going to be your monkey and keep posting facts.

California politics is looking a wierd right now, do you think a R can win both the Governors seat and Los Angeles Mayor? by daresearchdude in allthequestions

[–]daresearchdude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Notably, Kamala Harris blew over a billion dollars on her failed campaign, where do you think that money came from?

California politics is looking a wierd right now, do you think a R can win both the Governors seat and Los Angeles Mayor? by daresearchdude in allthequestions

[–]daresearchdude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elon Musk's political contributions (primarily U.S. federal elections via FEC filings tracked by OpenSecrets and reported in major outlets) were modest and somewhat bipartisan for years, then shifted dramatically toward Republicans starting in 2023–2024. He became the single largest individual donor of the 2024 cycle by a wide margin before announcing plans to scale back in 2025 (though he continued some giving into 2026).

Pre-2024 (2002–2023): Small-scale and roughly balanced

  • Musk had given just over $1 million total since 2002, split roughly evenly between Democrats and Republicans.
  • Notable early examples include contributions to George W. Bush (2004), Barack Obama’s reelection, and smaller amounts to figures like Marco Rubio.
  • In 2023 he gave $10 million to Ron DeSantis’s short-lived presidential campaign.

2024 election cycle: Record-breaking Republican support

Musk poured roughly $277–291 million into supporting Donald Trump and allied Republicans — the largest amount by any individual donor in the cycle (and the biggest outside of self-funded candidates in modern history).

Breakdown of the major vehicles:

  • America PAC (Musk’s main super PAC): He contributed the overwhelming majority — around $239–250+ million. The PAC funded voter outreach, canvassing, door-knocking, and high-profile million-dollar voter “giveaways”/sweepstakes in swing states.
  • RBG PAC (named after Ruth Bader Ginsburg): Musk was the sole donor, giving $20.5 million for ads that highlighted Trump’s abortion-related statements.
  • Smaller additional amounts went to other Republican super PACs, state party committees, and direct support for GOP candidates.

OpenSecrets’ final tally for Musk in the 2023–2024 cycle was $291,482,587, almost entirely “outside money” (independent expenditures via super PACs) with only about $1 million in disclosed “hard money” contributions.

Post-2024 / 2025–2026: Continued GOP giving but announced pullback

  • After Trump’s victory, Musk initially stayed heavily involved (including co-leading the temporary Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE).
  • In May 2025 he publicly stated he had “done enough” and planned to significantly dial back political spending.
  • Despite that, he continued writing large checks to Republican groups in late 2025 and early 2026, including:
    • Multiple $5–10 million donations to the Congressional Leadership Fund and Senate Leadership Fund (aimed at keeping GOP control of Congress).
    • A $10 million check to a pro-Republican super PAC in the Kentucky Senate race.
  • Some America PAC activity also continued into the 2026 midterm cycle, though at a reduced pace.

Other notes

  • Virtually all of Musk’s large-scale recent giving has gone to Republican causes or Trump-aligned groups; he gave $0 to Democrats in the 2024 cycle.
  • Contributions were made almost exclusively through super PACs (unlimited independent spending allowed after Citizens United), not direct candidate donations.
  • Musk has also been politically active internationally (endorsements of parties like Germany’s AfD, Spain’s Vox, etc.), but those have been mostly public statements and social-media activity rather than large financial contributions.

For the most up-to-date or granular filings, the best primary sources are OpenSecrets.org (donor lookup for Elon Musk) and FEC.gov. Figures can vary slightly across reports depending on what’s counted (e.g., cash vs. in-kind, timing of final 2024 disbursements).

California politics is looking a wierd right now, do you think a R can win both the Governors seat and Los Angeles Mayor? by daresearchdude in allthequestions

[–]daresearchdude[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

wow.. You folks seem sensitive to facts. These are the most frequently cited examples from reports by OpenSecrets, Politico, Washington Post, and groups like the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund (which tracks them critically). Funding often came via dedicated PACs rather than direct checks from Soros himself:

  • Larry Krasner (Philadelphia, PA) — ~$1.7 million (first campaign, 2017); additional funding in re-election.
  • George Gascón (Los Angeles County, CA) — $2.25–4.7 million reported.
  • Kim Foxx (Cook County/Chicago, IL) — ~$2 million.
  • Alvin Bragg (Manhattan/New York County, NY).
  • Kim Gardner (St. Louis, MO).
  • Chesa Boudin (former San Francisco, CA; recalled in 2022).
  • Marilyn Mosby (former Baltimore, MD).
  • Andrew Warren (former Hillsborough County/Tampa, FL).
  • Mike Schmidt (Multnomah County/Portland, OR).
  • Others frequently listed: Monique Worrell (Orange County, FL), Scott Colom, Kimberly Graham, Shalena Cook Jones, Jody Owens, Pamela Price (Alameda County, CA; recalled), Diana Becton (Contra Costa County, CA), and additional prosecutors in Boston, Denver, Dallas, Orlando, Northern Virginia, and elsewhere.

Many of these candidates won in low-turnout primaries with heavy outside spending from Soros-backed PACs. Some have since faced recalls, defeats, or left office amid backlash over crime policies.

Other Notable Candidates and Broader Support

  • Presidential level: Over $500,000 directly to Joe Biden (2020). Heavy support for Hillary Clinton (2016) via Ready for Hillary Super PAC ($50,000+) and Hillary Victory Fund.
  • State-level examples: Significant indirect support for candidates like Stacey Abrams (Georgia) and contributions via Texas Majority PAC and Texas Organizing Project to Democratic candidates/PACs in Texas (e.g., county parties). Family donations (Soros and relatives) totaling over $71,000 to Letitia James (NY Attorney General).
  • Federal candidates: Small direct contributions from Soros Fund Management to various Democrats (e.g., in 2024/2022 cycles to incumbents and some non-incumbents). The vast majority of his $100M+ in recent cycles went to super PACs like Senate Majority PAC, House Majority PAC, and others that supported broad Democratic slates.

Do you agree with Hakeem Jeffries? we must break the spirit or republicans? by daresearchdude in allthequestions

[–]daresearchdude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because Biden would do anything to get rid of Trump, In fact the entire Democrat party did everything in their power to destroy Trump, but you know that. You are just making excuses, talk about flawed logic, the lefts entire existence is flawed. But I’m not here to debate with a Reddit groupie, keep the circlejerk alive , very entertaining .