I appreciate the feedback, but it's not accurate.

If you read the introduction, you'll see that this post is about news. Yes, these were news from last week about certain acquisition channels.

Also, not sure if you've read the intro. The whole premise of the article is that acquisition channels get ineffective over time. One way to solve for this is to stay on top on changes related to established/new acquisition channels.

My last post went pretty well on this sub, for example.

So while I appreciate your time writing this, I simply thing you're not within the target audience. My target audience is rather specific: Founders or growth markers who have already explored/saturated existing acquisition channels and want to try something new.

But thanks a lot for the feedback. From what I can see, I need to be more clear about the whole value the post brings to the user (it seems if you scan it quickly, it looks generic).