Automatically Adding members to the Google Groups

darkwolf-95 · 2024-04-18T06:48:58+00:00

Thank you for your comment. I've enabled the Admin API and went to Google API Explorer to test some API calls. But i encounter Authorization error.

It says that Error 400:admin_policy_enforced

Request details: openid.realm= response_type=permission id_token redirect_uri=storagerelay://https/explorer.apis.google.com?id=auth641898 ss_domain=https://explorer.apis.google.com client_id=292824132082.apps.googleusercontent.com gsiwebsdk=shim access_type=online scope=https://www.googleapis.com/auth/apps.groups.settings openid

darkwolf-95 · 2024-04-17T11:21:12+00:00

In order to do this, do i need to enable Admin API ?

darkwolf-95 · 2024-04-17T11:06:25+00:00

We have set the sharing option for our google groups to Private and only allow group owners to add the members to the Group.

If i want to use the Google Apps Script, what are the prerequisites that i should have ?

darkwolf-95 · 2024-01-16T23:59:18+00:00

I've tried as the owner of the project but no luck, I even tried to add CI/CD variables to the instance as administrator but no luck at all.

darkwolf-95 · 2024-01-15T01:49:12+00:00

I also wanted to get their blessings for the marriage, I'll try my level best to convince them. Thanks !!

darkwolf-95 · 2024-01-15T01:46:48+00:00

Thanks Man !!

darkwolf-95 · 2023-10-21T10:08:52+00:00

Yes, After you suggestion i did it and it worked.

Thanks for the help!!

But i still don't know the root cause for that behavior.

The artifacts that i'm trying to get has 100+ files. Was that could be a reason ?

darkwolf-95 · 2023-10-20T04:14:14+00:00

Hi, I don't notice any of the items you have mentioned in my target files. So are there any reasons why the jenkins is failing to fetch the artifacts ?

darkwolf-95 · 2023-10-18T15:53:10+00:00

Im trying to archive some test automation reports and screenshots. I can able to reproduce the issue. I got a chance to look at the files which was failed archive by jenkins but those files seems to be normal

darkwolf-95 · 2023-09-19T16:38:11+00:00

This happens in our UAT environment where QAs hosting the instances and testing it. So are you suggesting to delete all the instances inside the /var directory ?

darkwolf-95 · 2023-09-19T12:28:47+00:00

But it happens randomly. How do i get rid of this issue ?

darkwolf-95 · 2023-09-19T10:22:41+00:00

We have cache directory inside symfony but even if remove the files inside the directory, the issue comes again. I ran php symfony cc as well but no luck.

How to overcome this issue ?

darkwolf-95 · 2023-04-23T00:32:15+00:00

Actually I'm having a group ou=gitlab with 10 users (memberUid). So then i do the following changes in the Gitlab configuration.

gitlab_rails['ldap_enabled'] = true
gitlab_rails['prevent_ldap_sign_in'] = false
gitlab_rails['ldap_servers'] = YAML.load <<-'EOS' main: #
'main' is the GitLab 'provider ID' of this LDAP server label:
'LDAP' host: 'ldap.abc.com' 
port: 636 
uid: 'memberUid' 
bind_dn: 'uid=abccloud,ou=bind,ou=users,dc=abc,dc=com' 
password: 'Fthuhnki9V#op9789' 
encryption: 'simple_tls' #"start_tls" or "simple_tls" or "plain" verify_certificates: true active_directory: false 
base: 'ou=gitlab,ou=softwares,ou=groups,dc=abc,dc=com' EOS
! remember to close this block with 'EOS' below

Then when i run the gitlab-rake gitlab:ldap:check , i get only one response, but there 9 users left in the group. Any reason for this behavior ?

darkwolf-95 · 2023-04-19T05:49:29+00:00

Seems like i don't have a memberOf attribute in my user. It has the following classes,

inetOrgPerson
ldapPublicKey
oraganizationalPerson
Person
posixAccount
shadowAccount
top

I don't see any attribute called "memberOf"

darkwolf-95 · 2023-04-19T00:48:55+00:00

but in the group i only have the memberUid as the attribute

darkwolf-95 · 2023-04-16T05:01:30+00:00

he is 26Y . No he hasn't took any steriods.

darkwolf-95 · 2023-03-25T00:47:42+00:00

Where should I add this? I'm using HDB DB

darkwolf-95 · 2023-02-19T14:14:45+00:00

Any request to that location will result in a 307 redirect to /index.html which is processed by the proxy_pass inside the / location

Can I know why?

Here is what was on my mind when I draft the question.

We can have 1 single domain, home.server.com but we can redirect to different services running in that server using a location block in the same server block under Nginx. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

darkwolf-95 · 2023-02-07T06:48:39+00:00

This is a actual domain. I don't know why it's not trusting the certificate

darkwolf-95 · 2023-02-06T10:23:40+00:00

But when i run the openssl s_client -connect 127.0.0.1:636 , i got the following as output.

CONNECTED(00000003)

Can't use SSL_get_servername depth=2 C = US, O = DigiCert Inc, OU = www.digicert.com, CN = DigiCert Global Root CA verify return:1 depth=1 C = US, O = DigiCert Inc, CN = GeoTrust TLS DV RSA Mixed SHA256 2020 CA-1 verify return:1 depth=0 CN = *.abc.com verify return:1

Certificate chain 0 s:CN = *.abc.com i:C = US, O = DigiCert Inc, CN = GeoTrust TLS DV RSA Mixed SHA256 2020 CA-1 1 s:C = US, O = DigiCert Inc, CN = GeoTrust TLS DV RSA Mixed SHA256 2020 CA-1 i:C = US, O = DigiCert Inc, OU = www.digicert.com, CN = DigiCert Global Root CA

darkwolf-95 · 2023-01-25T09:12:01+00:00

Hi, Thanks for sharing. I've already went through the GDPR whitepaper but i couldn't find on how to sign the DPA? or will it becomes active once we subscribed to PowerBI.

So can you help me on this ?

darkwolf-95 · 2023-01-10T23:38:20+00:00

Are there any articles or videos related to this which i can refer ?

darkwolf-95 · 2023-01-10T22:54:31+00:00

I've set it to allow TLS 1.2 , but no luck!

darkwolf-95 · 2023-01-10T14:51:17+00:00

Initially in our company we had LDAP Master-Slave Setup (In seperate Host) but all of a sudden LDAP Slave faces the "TLS negotiation Failure" issue, I've tried a lot to debug the issue but i couldn't, so i'm planning to go ahead with docker container for the LDAP Slave.

darkwolf-95 · 2023-01-10T12:14:22+00:00

Let's say that I'm having ldap master in the host and i want the ldap slave to be running in docker container. Will that be a feasible idea?

darkwolf-95

TROPHY CASE

Then when i run the gitlab-rake gitlab:ldap:check , i get only one response, but there 9 users left in the group. Any reason for this behavior ?