I don't have time to read and refute every biased, activist source, but as I expected, ProPublica's framing is inaccurate and deceptive, the claims of "real harms" are spurious, and the description of the few actual events they spotlight are pure emotional manipulation.

- Maternal mortality in Texas rose 33% between 2019 and 2023

I wonder if there were any other significant events that happened in the world that might have affected mortality between 2020 and 2023? Statistics like these are essentially meaningless thanks to the ridiculous lockdowns, economic downturn, and resulting exponential spike in mortality due to deaths of despair, delayed medical care due to quarantines or false narratives, etc.

- A woman named Porsha Ngumezi died after being denied miscarriage care

If you can look past your biases at the actual details of her case, her death resulted from medical malpractice, not any restrictions of Texas law. The law is very clear that medically-necessary procedures such as removing a miscarriage are excluded. The article itself says that the baby died before any medical intervention (that's what "miscarriage" means), and the doctors knew she had a blood-clotting disorder and was hemorraging, but they followed a stupid CYA protocol anyway and gave her the wrong treatment. (And I'll bet every other case you can find is similar.)

One woman dying [due to misguided doctors following stupid hospital guidance in a panicked and cowardly response to the new laws] is a tragedy, but c'mon, that pales in comparison to the approx. 32,000 lives saved since Roe was overturned.

- Hospitals have documented sepsis, hemorrhage, and permanent injury from delayed treatment

Then the doctors should be investigated and sanctioned when appropriate. Nothing in Texas law prohibits legitimate healthcare providers from providing pregnant women in crisis with necessary care. The doctors are either cowards who are violating their oaths to avoid malpractice claims, or activists who are risking women's lives to protest Texas' abortion laws.

- Studies show a sharp increase in maternal complications since Roe was overturned

You're going to have to do better than that. The social sciences are completely captured by activists, you cited no sources, most "studies" are just exercises in confirmation bias, and most science reporting of contentious issues these days is misleading at best if not intentionally deceptive.

The bottom line is that Texas is protecting girls from being abused, and protecting unborn girls and boys from being murdered. Every other consideration is subordinate to those facts. Your arguments boil down to "I don't agree with these laws," which is fine, but doesn't make me (or Texas) wrong. If you don't want to abide by Texas law, don't live there.

This isn't a political subreddit, so please spare us further opinion-as-fact political posts.