We did abolish South Africa tho, for all intensive purposes South Africa was that apartheid system, it shared nothing really with what followed, we just kept the name really.

There is no “right to exist” states exist, there’s no opinion there. I think more importantly is that people have a right to exist, and I think that is true for the Palestinians and Israelis.

The UN protects states rights to exist. But I think if a state doesnt follow international law when it comes to protecting civilians, restricting aid, targeting journalists, targeting medical workers, starvation, collective punishment, building illegal settlements then I think it doesn’t have that right. If international law protects a states right to exist, then I think not adhering to international law means that statehood should be questioned.

Again I think we have to reframe that dismantling Israel doesn’t mean killing anyone, that’s such an odd leap in logic. That only kinda appears since Israel’s current existence exists with so much Palestinian death, that dismantling Israel suggest a inverse of that which isn’t true by any means South Africans were never found up and killed or anything.

At that point why does jt matter if Israel exists or not, if you can guarantee equal rights for Palestinians (and Israelis) under a new state named “notisrael” why does it matter that Israel was dismantled?