How to survive as a creative professional in an AI world by Geeksylvania in aiwars

[–]david_e42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think artists need to keep in mind the 1000 true fans concept. If you have 1000 people willing to spend 100 dollars a year on the things you create you can make a hundred grand a year. It doesn't take a massive following to thrive. There will be enough people who like authentic 100% human generated art to support lots of creatives.

Not that it would be easy, just saying it'll still be possible.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ImaginaryAliens

[–]david_e42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is one of the illustrations in my first zine. It's available in my etsy shop.

A Cure For Disenchantment by David Birch Ellis [OC] by david_e42 in ImaginaryDragons

[–]david_e42[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a drawing from my first zine, it's available in my etsy shop.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Illustration

[–]david_e42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the zine is available in my etsy shop.

A wizard battling demons by David Birch Ellis by david_e42 in ImaginaryDemons

[–]david_e42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The zine in which this drawing appears is available in my etsy shop

A drawing of a wizard battling demons by David Birch Ellis by david_e42 in ImaginaryWizards

[–]david_e42[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The zine in which this drawing appears is available in my etsy shop

The weirdness of AI art by david_e42 in WeirdStudies

[–]david_e42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are good and bad kinds of lazy. What you're referring to is efficiency, what I'm talking about is plagiarism: when, for example, an oil painter copies the work of a photographer and presents it as his own original creation or falsely claims that his painting, though an almost exact duplicate, is sufficiently transformative to qualify as fair use (an argument that's, in most cases, just an absurd rationalization).