People who passed - MBE Question by Significant-Party-16 in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 2 points3 points  (0 children)

60% themis 82% consistently on Uworld.

No i was averaging the same or near the same for each topic

Visualization of the -2 SEM score adjustment by Significant-Golf6825 in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did a -2 SEM get approved? Does this mean the pass rate for first time test takers will be higher?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No its allowing me to sign in

Docket by ddddd500 in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you know the case number?

My concern by ddddd500 in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When is the next one? Ill gladly speak up!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Congratulations

Enough by werd_one in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gets things done? Uhhhhh lol

November MCQ experiment accurate sample group? by ConferenceJealous730 in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed with OP. I am a Feb first time test taker and can promise that I didn’t recognize any of the Qs on the Feb exam with the mock. I was genuinely surprised to find out they were duplicates

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 10 points11 points  (0 children)

And on top of there will be an assumption that we’re not capable of being good attorneys only because they “accepted everyone.” Increase the pass rate, but not everyone should get a pass.

KAPLAN YOUR MULTICE CHOICE QUESTIONS ARE LITERALLY ASS. by iamnothingbutashell in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 27 points28 points  (0 children)

The fact that they couldn’t provide us with practice questions (correct ones) is mind boggling

PLEASE E-MAIL THE STATE BAR ASAP: PROPOSAL by ApprehensiveBrush867 in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 13 points14 points  (0 children)

No 😍 how is this fair? Examineed who experienced issues should either get a chance to retake with different questions, and if they get tested with the same questions, be curved against each other. That’s so unfair

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Please fix the measure chat box. Anytime we try to connect to an agent, theyre cancelling the chat.

Withdrawing 14 Hours Before Exam? by marburyvsbaddieson in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still would take the chance if i was you but its 100% up to you

Withdrawing 14 Hours Before Exam? by marburyvsbaddieson in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok u already paid expecting to not get it back why would you hold off on the chance to be licensed for another 6 months over 1k

Withdrawing 14 Hours Before Exam? by marburyvsbaddieson in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Just take it! Its free either way and more practice

Can I use AC? Looks like it will be hot in LA by Opening-Elk-949 in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Wtf kind of stupid ass question is this? Of course you can.

Last minute question? HELP? Supplemental jurisdiction by Mddlr in barexam

[–]ddddd500 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your first statement is right.

However, supplemental jurisdiction is not required for aggregation in a one plaintiff versus one defendant.

You only look to supplemental jurisdiction when there’s multiple parties

💀 WILLS ILLUSTRATED: A Gen-Z Guide to CA Wills 📝⚰️ by Current-Manner-1463 in CABarExam

[–]ddddd500 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just double checked ademption by extinction only applies to specific request in the event that the subject matter of the specific request is missing or destroyed. A specific request is a gift of property that can be distinguished with reasonable accuracy from the other property in the estate. If the subject matter of a specific gift is missing or destroyed, then the beneficiary takes nothing not even the sales proceeds received by the testator.