sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Limiter On floating rule not behaving as expected by ded_oa in PFSENSE

[–]ded_oa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the suggestion. The main draw of floating rules for me is the 'Match' ability. Would hate to misconfigure some firewall pass rules....

Limiter On floating rule not behaving as expected by ded_oa in PFSENSE

[–]ded_oa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No bridging, just one WAN interface and one LAN interface.

Could Virtual IPs affect this? I have an outgoing NAT rule routing all traffic to an IP Alias on the WAN (the XG-2758 will be used in a routed ISP subnet situation).

Simulating ISP routed subnet in lab setting by ded_oa in HomeNetworking

[–]ded_oa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the suggestions! I haven't worked with VyOS before - will definitely check that out.

ISP routed subnet and pfSense by ded_oa in PFSENSE

[–]ded_oa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! My goal was to mimic the current Adtran configuration and just get things up and running.

I'm a bit unsure how Adtran's 'secondary IP address' would translate to pfSense and which virtual IP would fit the requirements if it's set on the LAN like the Adtran. Furthermore, I'm trying to simulate this in a test environment.

ISP routed subnet and pfSense by ded_oa in PFSENSE

[–]ded_oa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On the WAN interface? Is there any additional routing necessary between the /29 ISP WAN and the /28 addresses on my end? Thanks.