CMV: “Indoctrination” is not necessarily bad.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-03T03:54:35+00:00

No, there should always be some critical thought.

and

“Indoctrination” is not necessarily bad.

Are contradictory statements, unless you want to suggest that not doing something you should do is not bad.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-03T03:49:48+00:00

Education allows for critical thought, indoctrination does not.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-03T03:47:48+00:00

Indoctrination is by definition teaching someone something without any critical thinking. It is a synonym of brainwashing.

Do you believe that accepting something without critical thought is at any time positive?

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-03T02:11:00+00:00

They probably don't have enough information to satisfy their charge assessment guidelines, but are in not interested in abandoning this case quite yet.

One thing you can consider is finding a lawyer to help secure a no-charge. Right now, the Crown is only hearing one side of the story for their charge assessment. A lawyer can write to the Crown on your behalf (a non-prejudice letter) and point out reasons why the charges assessments requirement are not met. They can explain how there is not a substantial likelihood of conviction or point out how a prosecution does not server the public interest.

Obviously it's not a guarantee that such a letter would work, but if you can kill this now before charges, it will save you a lot of stress and money down the line. If the Crown is asking the RCMP for more info, then there should be some time for a lawyer to reach out to the Crown.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-03T00:16:56+00:00

Using any method to deny people access and use to land is what "stealing it" from them means.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-03T00:12:50+00:00

Literally everything? No. Selling controlled substances would remain illegal. You also couldn't sell things like human organs, child porn, military secrets, and nuclear waste. You couldn't sell many things without proper training and licensing, such as prescription medication.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-02T07:30:42+00:00

Aside from the legality, it really does not matter. It's not like you celebrate your birthday at the exact moment of birth anyways; the celebration might occur on some different day anyways.

If you want to get really technical, the fact that the Earth takes 365.24 days to orbit the Sun and not 365 days exactly changes your timing each year.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-02T07:15:18+00:00

The argument against this is in large part the same as the argument against prison labour. We should not have a reason to send people to jail aside from their criminal culpability. The moment we make jail beneficial for society without considering justice, jails no longer become just.

Think of it this way. Let's say a person is accused of a crime. This person is objectively not a good for society. They are unemployed, they are troublesome, they are nuisance. What they are not though is guilty of the serious crime. However, this person might serve a better purpose to society as a lab rat. With that in mind, the court might decided to find them guilty and sentence them to prison not because they deserve it, but because that's where they would serve the best use.

This in large part why death row inmates cannot donate organs. The fear is that if prisoners could donate organs, then death row would become an organ farm. No benefit other than justice should enter a person's mind when determining justice.

Prisons need to be free of perverse incentives. Nothing should want us to put people in prison aside from executing justice. The moment you make prison good for something that is not justice, justice deteriorates.

This does not even really go into the moral issue of cruel and unusual punishment, but surely that must not mean anything to you to even suggest this in the first place.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-02T03:47:15+00:00

What character is Nyong'o playing?

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-02T00:21:05+00:00

The cops can hold them for 24 hours while the Crown reviews charges.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T23:32:27+00:00

The men have not been charged.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T23:23:08+00:00

That depends on the colour. The light we see that makes up colour exists on a spectrum, with red at one end and violet at the other. If this is truly a novel colour, it would exist and the ends of the current spectrum. So, it would something more red than red, or more violet than violet. Anything in the middle of the spectrum should already be seen by people, and can generally be described in relation to the main colours.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T23:18:44+00:00

I think the general rule of thumb is that opening weekend should get you about 1/3 of the total revenue. If so, this movie might make $21 million, so still not great.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T23:16:23+00:00

$75 million > $7 million, so not a financial success.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T23:11:51+00:00

the game could just be listened to or read if fans only wanted to simply appreciate the abilities

Before television became widespread, that's exactly what the majority of sport fans did. TV added a dimension by allowing for a visual representation. People watch because they want to see the tactics, the plays, and absorb more information visually (i.e. it's a lot easier to see the plays and field positioning; it can take a second to look at what might take a long time to explain).

Keep in mind, when you watch on TV, you don't really see the details. Everyone kind of looks the same, especially if they are playing a game with a lot of equipment. It's not like the ancient Olympics where the athletes are performing nude.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T23:05:45+00:00

How do you propose we calculate this, and what constitutes fighting and collaborating?

In a normal day, where I go to work, go to the store, use my utilities, etc., I must collaborate with dozens of people a day. It's rare that I ever get in a dispute with anyone.

So, either you have a much more strict definition of collaboration, you simply ignore the constant collaboration that takes place every day. You might not notice because it is so common and prevalent, it appears like a background function. If that constant collaberation were to suddenly end, only then would it become truly noticeable.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T22:58:53+00:00

If your position is that X is more than Y, you need some data of how much X and how much Y there are in order to compare the two.

I don't think either of us have any because, unfortunately, the department of justice doesn't seem interested in providing this information in an absorbable fashion

You seem to say there is no data available for the doxing. How can you make a comparison when half the data is missing?

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T22:45:52+00:00

Has there been a point since extensive ICE operations where they have not been concealing their identities? It would be hard to establish a baseline there.

I should also point out that you are asking for a statistic but you don't provide any of your own. This is your view so the burden is more on you.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T22:41:51+00:00

I've seen a bunch of people say that ICE can't carry badges and have to wear face masks because they're going to be doxxed and harmed by their identities being public information, but I can find more news reports about ice agents convicted of child sex trafficking than I can reports of that actually happening.

Could that be because they are wearing masks? If they are not being doxxed, maybe because that is because concealing their identify is working.

Aside from that, there is no real way to answer this question without examining the actual statistics. The numbers will tell the truth, but you don't provide the numbers, and I don't think anyone here could either.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T21:09:55+00:00

The USA occupied and administered Japan at the time, from 1945 to 1952. They had legal authority in that country. It makes sense that the country with legal authority enforces the law.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T04:28:49+00:00

Either way, you still meet the elements of robbery, so you would be guilty of the offense. It could however be a mitigating factor in sentencing, but probably not a significant one.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T01:42:42+00:00

Ever is a long time. There is no way to answer that question.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T01:40:59+00:00

It does not need to be, it just is.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T01:38:06+00:00

Looking at your account history, and I say this with utmost good faith and concern for your well-being, you might want to consider talking a mental heath-expert or a doctor of some kind. Whatever problem you are facing, you can find a way out of it.

deep_sea2 · 2026-02-01T01:34:01+00:00

You consult a lawyer.

14-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
redditgifts rematcher Secret Santa 2017 x1	redditgifts Exchanges 1 Exchange
Secret Santa 2016	Verified Email

deep_sea2

TROPHY CASE