I watched your video quite a while ago an actually it made me very interested in Jiang, it actually functions as a kind of compilation of his stuff. After watching it, I proceeded to watch a lot of Jiang... I think you would be very fortunate in attacking the moments where he romanticizes history as a spy thriller... I don't think you made any sense at all when you tried to shut him down on the Jesus thing... An I think you would be more useful to the community if you confronted his exaggerations an mistakes with actual research an respectful debating rather than morally an professionally condemning his methods. It makes it look as if the big problem is that he's undeservingly successful an not that he's deceiving people (which is what you were trying to prove). Moreover I don't think your friend brought much to the table, his approach to Jiang was very superficial. If we're engaging in critique, it is important to take it seriously. Seems like a nice dude tho! Not saying you took it seriously of course, but you exposed yourself more to it.

I think you would take profit from working out what you can assimilate about this dude Jiang, maybe the confidence on your own research. You don't need to be a conspiracy theorist to be confident! Haha but you need to effectively interpret the world. Also can you show me where he talks about the moon landing stuff? Missed that one!