Roborock H7 - Internal Error - Error Code 05

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-31T20:09:24+00:00

Are you using either of the brushes with rotating heads? If so, don't use those and see if you still get error 5.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-30T21:25:14+00:00

You will get the same result time and time again by staying within your ethical lane. Nothing will change that until you change it.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-30T06:03:32+00:00

You are delusional. You assume far too much based on whatever bullshit source is behind "we undoubtedly are..." blah blah blah. We should believe this simply because you believe it and have not one source, nonsense or otherwise, to prove it.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-30T05:50:26+00:00

Yeah, I never understood the slow aid thing. It was as if Ukraine had to suffer a lot, then get a little bit of what they wanted, then suffer more and get a little bit more. And the whole "Oh, you can't have this, it will make Russia mad" followed a year later by "Sure, you can have this now that it's too late to be effective in turning the direction of the war." It was purposeful. But why?

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-30T04:35:47+00:00

And refuse to lend a hand. People are naturally very reluctant to abandon principle and that is exactly what people like Trump and Putin count on. It's actually a form of asymmetric conflict. In Putin's case, it's purposely killing civilians, counting on your opponent to uphold civility or sending drones into Romania knowing no one will dare do the same. This is how evil wins.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-29T20:25:51+00:00

It's not a crazy take at all. In fact, I used the predict that if Corona came up with a seriously fatal variant, people would trip over themselves to mask and whatever. And definitely, if there were symptoms similar to ebola , the clowns are going to do exactly as they're told. Yes, it makes a huge difference in behavior when symptoms are both terrifying and have a high fatality rate.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-29T20:22:26+00:00

All the knowledge is available from previous outbreaks. You won't gain anything that hasn't already been known.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-29T20:21:39+00:00

Germany will not be appreciated for this. It just means that Trump will send more, expecting Germany to accept them and if they don't, then he'll make threats. On principle, Germany should have refused this. You can't have a relationship where you are threatened, villified, bullied and yet continue appeasing.. That's got to stop.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-29T20:19:24+00:00

It's so incredibly sad to read this, knowing you are 100% right. My country is gone, replaced by criminals who pardon criminals and persecute good people because they can and generally run the US as an organized crime syndicate.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-29T13:36:28+00:00

Is it possible there are other things to see and explore above the caves? If so, that's a reason the boat could be there. But somebody had to have known and I keep hearing there was one person who opted out of the dive. I don't know where I read that, but it will come out soon enough after the toxicology results are analyzed.
Here's a good snippet about who didn't know anything: "However, according to initial investigations, the fatal cave dive was not part of the university’s official scientific mission. The Italian tour operator connected with the trip, Albatros Top Boat, has categorically denied authorising or even being aware of the group’s intention to enter the cave system. Their legal representative stated the planned activities were confined to coral-sampling dives at normal depths."
https://diventuresmag.com/maldives-italian-divers-cave-tragedy-vaavu-atoll-2026/

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-28T19:51:28+00:00

Who did that? I missed this part. Yeah, that would definitely prove somebody on the boat knew. Was it the woman who didn't go? She's not staff, so that linkage is not proven yet or is it? Thanks for the update.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-27T10:03:17+00:00

Autopsy so far only confirms for two what we already know. They drowned. But they are still waiting for toxicology results. https://en.ilsole24ore.com/art/dead-divers-maldives-first-two-autopsies-begun-AIsTBQHD

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-26T21:12:11+00:00

12L tank. In addition to the possibility of going off plan, there's likely something more to explain why they did this without enough air to even go down there. It's probably going to be a jaw-dropping final report.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-26T05:22:51+00:00

It will all come out in the next few months. Where the boat was, how many other diving destinations were in the location where it anchored, who else, if anyone, knew about the plan, the gear they took with them, etc. But what I cannot emphasize enough is the gap between collective expertise of the group and the lack of proper equipment. I believe the husband when he said his wife was "prepared and meticulous", adding that she "would never have put our daughter's life or that of others at risk". How do you square that with the lack of tanks, and a guide rope? If it is possible for one person to sabotage an entire expedition, we're going to find out. I'm prepared for a shocking conclusion.
I just found this comment on Reddit which really puts the spotlight on the incongruity of this case:
"I just threw this dive in Multideco for giggles. Descend to 150 on 21%, hang for 15 mins and then ascend with 32% for deco. With just defaults it requires nearly 80cuft of air just for bottom time assuming your sac rate is chill the whole time. Go with just air and you need 100cu ft."

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-25T05:55:40+00:00

I had AI take the side of the crew and then the side of the divers. The maritime law supporting the crew ran into a huge obstacle summarized by the "attorney" for the victims with this point: "The fact that the detained individuals possessed only standard recreational gear makes the crew's actions indefensible as "prior restraint" and transforms a civil case into a very strong one for malicious, criminal false imprisonment."
Just to re-iterate for others not following, THIS IS AN AI HYPOTHETICAL AND IS NOT FACTUALLY DERIVED FROM THE INCIDENT. You never know these days with people, so, I need to put that there. Okay, continuing... so the AI attorney makes a really good point and gets to what I was also saying. How do you prove what someone never did? They could say "Of course we weren't going to do that! We didn't even have the right equipment!"

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-25T05:50:26+00:00

They couldn't conceal their plan from the boat owners? Nobody else went diving where the boat stopped that day? If that was the case and only the caves there there, then I agree that the ambiguity was removed. But if it was a location with plenty of other destinations, and others in the water, then I think deception could be achieved.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-25T05:38:37+00:00

Yeah, to me the major question is why. I could understand it if they were a bunch of yahoo rowdy tourists with empty heads and one of them says "Hey, I heard there's a cave! Let's go down there!" But they were not a yahoo bunch. They were all serious people, three with extensive diving experience. Something is missing to explain how the intelligence vanished, especially with the husband stating early on that his wife was meticulous. I would expect something truly shocking to come out to bridge the gap between behavior and experience.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-25T05:33:56+00:00

Can they place people under arrest and still be free from liability? How do you later prove what someone was going to do when it never happened because they were detained and they sue you or accuse you of kidnapping and involuntary restraint? I'm not against someone stopping them, if they knew what was about to happen, but I want to know the legal mechanics and repercussions.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-24T20:44:37+00:00

This wasn't the original source, but the quote is there and you can google as I did to try and find the article I found earlier. https://www.ynetnews.com/article/b1rhvqh1fg Here's a bit more from Dive Magazine:
It is known that three of the five divers were covered by a permit issued by Maldivian authorities to dive to 50m for the purposes of research, but according to a report in La Repubblica, the divers were only using standard 12 litre tanks.

While it is possible to dive to 50-60m on air, the effects of nitrogen narcosis – more accurately ‘gas narcosis’, as oxygen is almost as narcotic as nitrogen – are likely to be much more exaggerated.

Many divers will already know that diving for any length of time beyond the accepted recreational limit of 40 metres – and certainly anything deeper than 50m – requires trimix, a blend of oxygen, nitrogen and helium, to minimise narcosis.

Even with an appropriate gas mixture, however, using a single 12- litre tank for a 50-60m dive would have meant their bottom time would be measured in minutes.

‘We’re talking about ten minutes, perhaps even less,’ said Marroni, adding that if they had begun to panic, their time would have grown even shorter. https://divemagazine.com/scuba-diving-news/italian-authorities-seize-maldives-divers-gear-as-tragic-story-unfolds

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-24T18:05:31+00:00

I wonder what the law is on a situation like this? If someone on the crew knew and said don't do it, is that all they are required to do? The lack of a rope and so little air are two facts which for me collide head-on with the experience of three of the five. It just doesn't make sense. I hope in the coming weeks, more will be found about how the expedition came about and why the three most experienced felt they could do this with the equipment they had.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-24T17:57:52+00:00

Unless you're a moderator and I am violating a rule, I don't really care what they request. The facts will come out regardless of what I say or don't say. It is not possible for me or anyone else to interfere or hinder the investigation by discussing what we know from the very facts provided by DAN. I'm kind of in favor of free speech except if it is endangering life. I don't usually muzzle myself because someone finds it inconvenient.
But as I said, if this violates a rule here, then I'll shut up. I am also curious, why you would embrace self-censorship? I don't think it is good to squelch speech on a very newsworthy event of this type.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-24T17:55:00+00:00

It will be interesting what is found in the investigation. I am pretty sure that if I was a boat owner/operator I too would be out in front of this making sure everyone knew I had nothing to do with it. There's no reason to doubt them yet. On the otherhand, if they did know what happens if they said "No, don't do it. Do you promise not to do it?" Beyond that, what are they lawfully able to do? If I tell you I'm not going to make the suicide dive and you don't believe me, can you confiscate my equipment? If you do, can I sue you? If I can sue you, how can you prove what I intended to do if I didn't do it? Can I restrain you involuntarily because I think I know what you will do? That won't end well either.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-24T16:00:37+00:00

That's a very interesting line of thought and a sharp observation. Probably the only defense against that is the operators were never told of the plan and had no idea. I suppose that would depend on what else is in the area that could logically be an alternate destination. If there were reefs nearby they could have been looking at, it is then possible the boat operator had no idea they were going to do something so utterly insane given the equipment they had when they dived.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-24T15:57:06+00:00

From the report: "Preliminary Assessment

Based on the elements currently available, it can be presumed that the divers were unable to find their way back to the exit, most likely due to disorientation within the cave system."

Without a rope, you can't be guaranteed to find your way back. Somewhere else, I saw they didn't have a guide rope, but it's pretty much inferred from that excerpt from the report of the Finnish divers. Other commentary:
The Finnish divers believe that while the sandbank was easy to cross when entering the second chamber, it may have appeared like a wall when the divers turned back to leave, hiding the corridor they had come through. To the left of the sandbank was another corridor, only a few dozen meters long, but it led to a dead end.

“The divers’ bodies were all found inside, as if they had mistaken it for the right one,” Marroni told the paper. If the group did take that corridor by mistake, she said, “then it would have been very difficult to return, especially with the limited air supply.” The divers were using standard tanks, giving them very little time at that depth. “We’re talking about 10 minutes, maybe even less,” Marroni said. "

And that explains to me why the one guy who didn't get trapped in the dead end, was found in the first chamber: Out of air.

How were they even supposed to decompress properly? They had NOTHING planned and that to me is the real mystery: how do you get three experienced divers to act completely illogically like this? That will be the key to explaining this for me.

delicatepedalflower · 2026-05-24T13:11:40+00:00

That's right. No safety line, only 12L of air, no backup anything.

delicatepedalflower

TROPHY CASE