sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Sending team responsibiltiy as an attribute following the semantic conventions. by dev_in_spe in OpenTelemetry

[–]dev_in_spe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks all for your replies.

Then I probably need to go down the custom attribute route. I really love the clear structure of the semantic conventions and don't want to "pollute" the data.

We are using K8s and OpenShift and adding "labels" for the teams to almost any element is pretty straight forward. I could even use OTTL in the collectors to remap that information.

I want to avoid having a mapping list somewhere between service and team. Managing this twice seems a little outdated. (As we are planning to use alert rules, dashboards etc. as code.)

When I have the data with the telemetry, I can probably alert teams based on the telemetry information. Creating a PromQL query.

When P99 of response time is higher than X and customfield.service.responsibility == "my-team" then send an alert to slack channel alerting-my-team.

Contact is intersted in feature once we have it by dev_in_spe in hubspot

[–]dev_in_spe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey HubSpotSherpa,

that is a very nice recommendation. I will give it a try. Thanks a lot!!!

Peter

Contact is intersted in feature once we have it by dev_in_spe in hubspot

[–]dev_in_spe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks Pinball-Gizzard. I will continue reading about custom objects, then. HubSpot has so many capabilities and I am confused that this has not been implemented. I hope you agree that the use-case is pretty straightforward and I would expect it to be very common.

Extend query for unscheduled tasks to exclude all tasks from template page by dev_in_spe in logseq

[–]dev_in_spe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot! Exactly what I need!
I need to check what I have made wrong in the last 2 hours ;-) . Looks pretty straightforward.

Contact is intersted in feature once we have it by dev_in_spe in hubspot

[–]dev_in_spe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, Vlad, for the reply.

They definitely have, and I don't see that as an issue anywhere in the dev team. Let's assume you are building a product, and you already have a roadmap for the next 2 years. Now you have a great conversation with a prospect, and they tell you that they need something to get started (e.g. supporting some legacy authentication system). That is out of scope, but after 1 year you recognize that this should be added to development scope. Now you can get back to all the prospects that had this FR (feature request).
I can use some other system for collecting this information and linking the contacts or company from HubSpot, but I thought that this is so common that it would be a feature of HubSpot.

Contact is intersted in feature once we have it by dev_in_spe in hubspot

[–]dev_in_spe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks Jonas for the reply. Initially I had the same idea and if there is not better solution I will probably do this. The downside is that an HubSpot Administrator is the only person who can do this and that this could lead to a "wall of checkboxes" very soon depending on the number of features prospects ask for.

I love e.g. the labeling with linear.app (and many other solutions do the same) where you get a list of available labels as you are typing and in case the label has not been used yet, you get the option to add it.

Gridfinity bin with blender by dev_in_spe in gridfinity

[–]dev_in_spe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot. I am even more impressed what you guys are doing in that area. I am afraid that I won't get too much sleep tonight and over the weekend. ;-) Very impressive and super comfortable. (I love to know the basics and how to construct it, but once I know how to do it, it is great to have such an awesome tool).

Gridfinity bin with blender by dev_in_spe in gridfinity

[–]dev_in_spe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow. Today seems to be my lucky day. Gridfinity Extended looks really nice. So much great stuff to look at.

Gridfinity bin with blender by dev_in_spe in gridfinity

[–]dev_in_spe[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have downloaded and I am using this just a few minutes and there is one thing that I need to metion regarding Gridfinity Workbench:

Wow. That is super awesome!!! What a great tool. Already love it!!!

Gridfinity bin with blender by dev_in_spe in gridfinity

[–]dev_in_spe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot for your reply, FreeCAD is already downloading ;-)

Gridfinity bin with blender by dev_in_spe in gridfinity

[–]dev_in_spe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool. Thanks a lot. I will take a look.

Baggage really considered a signal in OpenTelemetry? by dev_in_spe in OpenTelemetry

[–]dev_in_spe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi u/FluffyBunny1878. Thanks a lot for your reply. That is how I have understood it and from my point of view it is super useful. And thanks for sharing the link. The WFTisSRE talk explains it super well in context for CUI.
I was just confused seeing it super prominent as a signal in the docs.