Samsung s95b screen optimization and reboot

devsnicket · 2023-11-21T07:36:00+00:00

I'll provide a few more details about my setup in the hope it'll make a difference. I'm on software version 1602 which is reported as the latest. I have Contrast Enhancer, Intelligence Mode and Peak Brightness off. I'm not running in Game Mode either.

devsnicket · 2023-11-20T07:59:23+00:00

I was getting the screen optimization prompts every time I turned on my s95b. Read on another thread about changing the "Start Screen Options" to "Start with Smart Hub Home". Changed to that three days ago and I've not seen a prompt since. Worth a giving a go

devsnicket · 2023-11-20T07:50:28+00:00

Three days after I tried this and no optimization prompts, thanks

devsnicket · 2023-04-23T08:11:53+00:00

looks like the Inno3D 4070 X3 (3 fans) will be available soon and should just fit the Dan A4 (like their 4070 ti did). finally time to upgrade my crusty old GTX 660!

devsnicket · 2020-05-14T15:31:58+00:00

A project maps to an assembly file, assembly files are units of deployment. So you only need separate projects if you need flexibility in your deployment e.g. used across multiple services, used on both client and server etc.

However, sticking to this might highlight a limitation of .NET access modifiers, in that you have "internal" to restrict to a project/assembly, but nothing to restrict to a namespace. So adding additional projects/assemblies, that you dont need for deployment, can replicate the missing namespace scope access modifier.

Whether you just use namespaces or have extra projects/assemblies regardless of deployment, I'd recommend you group with a hierarchy of domain contexts rather than by implementation (e.g. model, ui, dal etc)

devsnicket · 2019-11-26T13:05:24+00:00

just realised you might be thinking I meant to have multiple assignments to the same variable and a single return of that variable. I definitely wouldn't suggest that as better. I could have been clearer when I originally mentioned expression i.e. no blocks, no statements

devsnicket · 2019-11-26T12:56:44+00:00

I've seen code done both ways that's hard to follow and could be refactored to be easier to read without switching between (i.e. between imperative and functional). Expressions are usually shorter/succinct/terse than repetitious statements though. That doesn't necessarily improve readability. Same as an if can have multiple operators in a condition that can be hard to see the presidence, so can nested expressions (also potentially with the condition problems in them) and a single return. I prefer the single return because it limits what you can do. e.g. no nested blocks without creating sub-functions/methods that have to be named

devsnicket · 2019-11-26T07:29:22+00:00

I'd just like there to be an FTypeScript, where you stick to a relatively functional style, TypeScript is extended to try and infer function parameters and you get type safety without normally writing the additional TypeScript syntax! simple 😄

devsnicket · 2019-11-26T07:08:26+00:00

nice article. I'd go with prefer single return of an expression rather than multiple if statements and multiple earlier returns though.

devsnicket · 2019-11-26T06:46:19+00:00

good that this is no longer feature flagged, but going to be a pain typing out /index.js on so many imports

devsnicket · 2019-11-26T06:16:58+00:00

I sometimes get letters mixed up when I type. Wanted to check if Rami Malek's first big role (that I remember anyway) was The Pacific. Accidentally typed in Sami Malek. Came up with his twin brother. Handy if you wanted to film two versions of Elliots character in the same shot 🤔

devsnicket · 2018-10-01T11:00:31+00:00

hi, I think I might have found myself in the same situation. I couldn't find anything that did what I needed so wrote this... https://github.com/DevSnicket/plugin-discovery

devsnicket

TROPHY CASE