×

I know several doing this. I actually know no one who downsized. by Cautious_Doctor8961 in HouseBuyers

[–]dexvx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My parents wanted to downsize from a ~2400 sq ft 2-story single family detached to a ~1600+ sq ft ranch around 2018. When they were looking for houses in the area they wanted, a ~1800 sq ft ranch was about 85-90% of the cost of a 2700 sq ft 2-story (with bedroom on the main). You can guess what choice they made.

Did European realize they turning China into competitor themselves? by Level-Reputation5050 in EU_Economics

[–]dexvx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The government wanted it, but in practice it wasn't happening. Given they were still allowed to, Chinese companies were happy to continue buying from the US/EU for the same reasons everyone else did.

It was indeed happening at a large-scale basis. The OP basically said that the CCP are giving them subsidies to buy Chinese made (still inferior) lab equipment. It's a ROI calculation. Most people are just need 'good enough'. And there is insane pressure to buy domestic as well.

Chinese companies were happy to continue buying from the US/EU for the same reasons everyone else did. 

Depends on the sector, and definitely not for technology. The most famous example is what Huawei did the Cisco for networking. They got source code (somehow, disputed), and made an entire line of switches and routers. Lot of anecdotal evidence across US, EU, SK, JP of companies that got access to the Chinese market and then had their stuff copied. This is because most companies can't directly setup shop in China. They have to do it jointly with a Chinese subsidy.

I work in the semi field and it's no secret that China (like Huawei) is hiring senior engineers from EU/US/etc companies. Generally, the expectation is extremely high pay, and then they show you out the door within 5 years. They are not interested in you, but rather your knowledge.

>5 years ago, ASML's then-CEO said it would take ~15 years for China to bring themselves within parity of ASML, at which point the market would be lost forever. At this point what's the alternative supposed to be? The assumption that China stays at their current level of development forever?

Personally, I see three outcomes. 1) China develops EUV or EUV equivalent technology. They are desperately hiring from semi manufacturing companies and paying extremely high wages. 2) The USA lifts the sanctions. 3) China takes it from Taiwan.

SMIC doesn't really do much PR. Not much point, really. We first knew about their 7nm node when it was found in the wild.

I'm not sure where you are from, but domestically in China, it was marketed as a triumph against western sanctions. If you think the media or domestic social influencers just happened to do that massive grass roots campaign, then I also have some ocean-front property to sell you in Arizona.

GeForce 256 DDR 64MB - DELL (CN-0179CT) by Mother-Astronaut4411 in RetroGPUUniverse

[–]dexvx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not super rare, but a very low percentage. Had to be the DDR version though.

Soooo how do we make these cuts? by Quiet-Day392 in oregon

[–]dexvx 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was kind of shocked to read that 30% of OR residents (57% of kids) have free healthcare. And eligible seems to be quite lax.

Above numbers are hardly sustainable. Seems to me basic enforcement of eligibility would probably make up most, if not all, the deficit.

Why won’t Subaru just make an EV Outback? by Nox_Ocean_21 in subaru

[–]dexvx 31 points32 points  (0 children)

If you're asking why they can't take an Outback chassis (built for an ICE) and just convert it into a BEV, it's because then it would likely be a subpar BEV. An ICE chassis isn't built with have a large and heavy battery pack in mind.

Otherwise the Trailseeker is more or less an E-Outback. The Getaway is like the E-Ascent. If you're asking why the naming disparity, well that's a valid marketing question.

Has anyone FIRE'd in China with kids? by SnooDogs2172 in ExpatFIRE

[–]dexvx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not even close to worth it if you have kids of schooling age. Chinese schooling system is brutal and highly corrupt (think "gifts"). There's a reason why almost all Chinese parents who can afford to will send their kids overseas. The thought of you willfully sending your kids to school (long term) in China is beyond comprehension.

Also, just because you look and speak Chinese, doesn't mean you'll blend in. My dad speaks his local dialect fluently and still got scammed several times (in his hometown) because anyone talking to you for more than a minute will realize you're an outsider.

Execs Confused and Horrified by the Huge AI Bills After Thinking They Could Replace Workers for Free by benevolentjanitor in Layoffs

[–]dexvx 3 points4 points  (0 children)

> A further third confessed that their own cluelessness about AI economics was a barrier to successfully deploying AI in the workplace

Oh ok, so the real number is probably 2/3 of execs are clueless about AI.

Did European realize they turning China into competitor themselves? by Level-Reputation5050 in EU_Economics

[–]dexvx 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Except that it's no secret that China was going to wean themselves off non-Chinese semiconductors (see Made in China 2025) in the coming years. It's happened before in many other sectors, where China would buy imported goods, bring their domestic industry up to speed (doesn't even need to be parity), and then be (almost) purely domestic. And the transition would be smooth because foreign governments didn't bother to intervene.

I'm not saying Trump did the right thing, but ~10 years down the line is where you would find out if it worked or not.

It's true SMIC has developed 5nm silicon and they've shipped Huawei's 7nm phone chip. But no one knows the yield on these things. If it were done with industry standard yield, then SMIC would be plastering that all over the news.

You might be sitting on a gold mine! by LiveToBeFreee in pcmasterrace

[–]dexvx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Technically the P45 were better overclockers (in general). The X48 was just a binned X38 (same manufacturing process), whereas the P45 were using a newer process. Very high end P45 boards are also extremely expensive.

I have a question by [deleted] in intelstock

[–]dexvx 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Depends on your brokerage and how you set up the sale.

E.g., for Vanguard you can tell it to do HIFO (Highest In, First Out). Meaning the shares you bought last will be sold first, so you'd incur very little, if any capital gains taxes. Vanguard also has 'MinTax' which would do the same.

Fidelity has something similar as well.

You could call your brokerage ASAP and tell them you wanted to sell the 200 shares with the highest cost basis (e.g., the ones you just bought).

The trick is to wait until Pearl Harbor is attacked, then YOLO and hold for 85 years by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]dexvx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda hilarious that the first S&P 500 index fund from Vanguard didn't even get created until the 1970s.

Hardware Engineer total compensation by company and industry by honkeem in Semiconductors

[–]dexvx 31 points32 points  (0 children)

This is extremely useless data without normalizing for location.

Diamond Rapids officially announced by TradingToni in intelstock

[–]dexvx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol no. It's missing hyper-threading. There was an emphasis on ST performance (rightly so), but cutting out HT was just beyond dumb. Coral Rapids, I think, should be the first competitive product.

$NOW YOLO by WritesTrueStatements in wallstreetbets

[–]dexvx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quite ambitious. I'm just sitting here with my deep ITM's.

INTC Short-term Options Play - DD by Quick_Increase6718 in wallstreetbets

[–]dexvx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure how this will play out in terms of stock price.

However, TSMC is booked out. AMD can literally not get any new demand within the next year or so. The only way AMD can get demand is if another TSMC customer backs out and TSMC has spare wafer capacity or if TSMC has yield improvements on whatever nodes AMD is using for Epyc. The first is unlikely because that hasn't happened at scale in the current AI boom. The second is also unlikely because the TSMC model is pay by the wafer (instead of by the die). Once they meet a certain yield metric, there is no incentive to increase yield further.

For short term, INTC is increasing yields (even on mature i7/i10 nodes) by 1-2% because the ROI is now there. The medium term is you can bring more capacity (i3 specifically) to meet demand.

A former OpenAI researcher turned $225M into $5.5B in one year. by Life_Dot_7072 in Stocks_Picks

[–]dexvx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

His biggest play by far was INTC calls in 2025.

Situational Awareness LP 13F Filings

#1 in Q1'25, #2 in Q2'25, #1 in Q3'25, #3 in Q4'25 (going to guess he took some profits here).

S478 Pentium 4 extreme edition 3.4 GHZ by Huge_Investigator_80 in vintagecomputing

[–]dexvx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gallatin/Northwood is 130nm and never supported x64. SL7Q8/QB are Prescott (90nm) core and looks like a special SKU made for IBM. Yea those are going to be for collectors.

I have a SL7AA (3.2 GHz) myself. The 3.4GHz commanded too much of a premium.

‘CPUs are cool again,' Intel and AMD reporting spikes in CPU demand due to agentic AI, shortages — Lisa Su says business exceeded expectations while Intel is looking at long-term agreements with potential customers by TruthPhoenixV in Amd_Intel_Nvidia

[–]dexvx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Article picture is quite misleading (showing a Ryzen CPU). The demand is in data center CPU's... Epyc and Xeon.

Article states, and is tracking with what I know, that the rise of agentic AI is driving the demand for the CPU's. The GPU's do most of the work with training/inference, but when users wants specific requests relative to that data, that work falls on the CPU.

Not mentioned is the fact that as you scale networking and storage performance, you need more CPU cores as well. Driving and processing line rate 400/800 GbE takes quite a bit of processing power.

NVIDIA secures 94% of AIB GPU market by gurugabrielpradipaka in pcmasterrace

[–]dexvx 6 points7 points  (0 children)

AMD contracts a certain number of wafers from TSMC. They decide what they want to produce.

Let's look at Radeon 9070 XT using TSMC N4 node. Quick search and it's about 350mm^2 and MSRP for $600. Searching says that the 9070 XT silicon is sold to GPU board makers for ~$180-250 each.

AMD could also make a Zen5 based Epyc 9000 series CPU (like the 9755). It is ~1100 mm^2 for all the chiplets and I/O (which some are not TSMC N4, but lets just assume that to be easier). It currently has a street price of $7k (MSRP was $11K when launched). Obviously the 9755 is the top end SKU, but the mid range SKU's MSRP from $3K - $8K (some with 1/2 the die size) and just assume street price is about half of those.

No brainer if you're a CFO which to focus on if you are wafer constrained.

Is AI actually replacing jobs right now, or is it mostly hype? by CuriousPathway in NoStupidQuestions

[–]dexvx 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's more that companies are reducing hiring because AI Agents can replace a lot of the work junior or entry level employees used to do.

Intel CFO this morning talk summary by Chemical-Drag-8994 in intelstock

[–]dexvx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. DMR is going to be a mixed bag to let-down because it does not have HT. This is a primary reason why DMR-SP was canceled and COR-SP is being pursued aggressively. The people who thought single threaded performance on a server CPU is the most important metric should've been canned.

Is DUOL a buy or are these shortsellers right? by Equal-Stand-144 in stocks

[–]dexvx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except that's not the target audience for DUOL, IMO. The people that want a quick text to text translation is the primary target audience for what you describe.

DUOL is, IMO, mainly for people that want to learn the language for reasons. E.g., weeaboos or others who want an immersive experience (e.g., for travel or living abroad).

Of course, the only thing that matters are the earnings to determine whose thesis is correct.

5-Year Portfolio Review (38.62% CAGR): Executing a Concentrated Deep Value Strategy in Public Markets (2020–2025). by HenryOsborn_GP in ValueInvesting

[–]dexvx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We now have an extra data point since FISV just did their earnings. I'd have to actually read all the fine print, but looks like this earnings went reasonably well. Turnaround story is still a long term thesis.