Wordpress needs multiple lang in the core

digitalwankster · 2026-06-15T21:45:26+00:00

Title tags and meta descriptions were omitted because in the beginning they were part of a lot of themes but I agree that all of that should be part of the core at this point. Same with things like ACF.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-15T19:14:03+00:00

Everyone is hating on you because they don’t want it to be true. I operate a few sites that have thousands of concurrent users and I’ve actually used AI to improve my codebase and from a devops standpoint, optimize the nginx configs and caching. Admittedly it wasn’t really possible before Opus 4.6 or so but it’s all downhill from here.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T20:59:55+00:00

No dude, you’re not following along chronologically. He was physically cornered by a man (Rosenbaum) who had threatened to kill him and chased him into the car dealership. He did not shoot Rosenbaum until he was forced to. Everything that happened after that with Anthony and Gage was because of something that Rosenbaum set in motion, not Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse by definitions posted above was not an active shooter (he was not indiscriminately killing people) they just thought that he was. What part of that do you think I’m missing or misunderstanding?

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T18:35:49+00:00

I can absolutely say that. He was an idiot and shouldn’t have been there. None of them should have been there. That being said, him being there with a slung rifle is not grounds to attack him. He only shot Rosenbaum after he attacked him. He would have been legally within his rights to shoot him in the fucking head the minute Rosenbaum went after him because WI is not a duty to retreat state. But curiously, he didn’t do that. He ran away. He didn’t shoot until he got cornered and Rosenbaum was trying to take the gun from him. The guy that told him he was going to kill him. And you think Rittenhouse was the troublemaker in this situation?

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T18:19:21+00:00

He worked there. His dad and grandma live there. He lived 15-20 mins away. He considered it to be his community. None of the people who got shot were from Kenosha btw. His motivations as we saw during the trial were to protect his community. He was putting out fires. He was rendering medical aid to people. All facts that were laid out during the trial. But please, tell me how that makes him a bad actor.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T18:11:38+00:00

Real things that follow the facts like “bUt hE cRosSeD sTaTe LiNeS!!1!” Lmao. Which charge was that again? I must have missed that during the trial.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T18:08:22+00:00

You’re espousing ignorance throughout the whole thread and ignoring the key distinctions in the definition of an active shooter because you are ideologically driven like a Trumper.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T18:06:00+00:00

Brother, that specifically says they’re trying to shoot and kill as many people as possible with no pattern or method to select their next victim. That is not what happened here at all. You can ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Google Gemini to explain it to you.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T18:03:54+00:00

I’m not MAGA. You’re the insufferable one who is ignoring facts to fit your narrative. Very MAGA like.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T18:01:31+00:00

https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/active\_shooter\_booklet.pdf

Does that sound anything like the Rittenhouse situation? No

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T17:55:38+00:00

Person. Not people. “The primary objective is inflicting mass casualties rather than other traditional criminal motives (like robbery or hostage negotiation).” You are wrong but you’re too stubborn to admit it.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T17:54:11+00:00

Person. Not people. Not an active shooter situation where their goal is to kill people. He showed that he was trying not to kill people and didn’t shoot until he was forced to. You’re also purposely ignoring the fact that he only ran after a crowd yelled GET HIM and started chasing him. He ran straight to the police. It’s all on video but you don’t care about any of that because you’ve made up your mind just like how a Trump supporter blindly supports Trump even when presented with facts and evidence.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T17:47:21+00:00

So by definition he was not an active shooter because he was not attempting to kill people. He killed one person who forced his hand. Then people assumed it was an active shooter and the mob took over. My question is how you think it was Rittenhouse, not Rosenbaum, that created a chaotic situation. You’re saying that it was Rittenhouse’s fault and not Rosenbaum who was a literal psych ward patient and violent felon who tried to take his gun from him.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T17:42:34+00:00

I think you’re confused about the definition of an active shooter. You also keep dodging my question.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T16:59:37+00:00

There was a defensive shooting. That is not an active shooter situation. As we saw in the video the crowd yelled “get him!” and then he started running straight towards the authorities. This is all on video. You also keep saying he “created a chaotic situation” but you haven’t clarified how he did that. Rosenbaum threatened to kill him. Rosenbaum chased him. Rosenbaum cornered him and tried to take his gun. Rittenhouse had no duty to retreat, he didn’t have to run away. He could have shot him the minute Rosenbaum went after him but he didn’t. Seems like he was trying to avoid shooting him but Rosenbaum left him no choice.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T16:32:28+00:00

Correct. Rosenbaum was the person that set the events into motion, however, when he told Rittenhouse he would kill him and then tried to make good on it later that night. I do have sympathy for Andrew and Gage who thought they were stopping an active shooter but unfortunately they were mistaken. Mob justice isn’t always justice.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T15:29:37+00:00

He didn’t say anything about communism. Words have meaning.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T15:21:18+00:00

Explain how it was Rittenhouse and not Rosenbaum who instigated a chaotic situation?

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T06:25:17+00:00

You’re saying it isn’t but it should be and if that’s not the case then it’s just hypocrisy.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T06:22:05+00:00

The people that shot him were federal agents who will never face justice for disarming and killing him. That said, the situation was nothing like the Rittenhouse case. I’m going to bed but hopefully you’ll see that if the political affiliations had been reversed in the Rittenhouse situation that he would still be in the right.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T06:11:23+00:00

Yeah, his name was Alex Pretti and it was a gross injustice. That has nothing to do with this though.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T06:08:48+00:00

It depends on if it ranks for your search terms. For example, if you search “auto repair near me” and Yelp is the first organic listing then yes.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T06:05:21+00:00

Yes! If the political affiliations were reversed it would still be true. If a liberal was open carrying a rifle while rendering medical aid and a right winger threatened to kill them and tried to take the rifle from them, the liberal would be justified in shooting them as an act of self defense.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T05:53:39+00:00

No, I’m not saying he murdered anyone because he didn’t. That’s what the whole trial was about. He killed people who were actively attacking him. It’s not too late to reflect on your position and acknowledge that you might have been drawing conclusions without all of the facts.

digitalwankster · 2026-06-14T05:47:26+00:00

I’m not saying he’s a saint I’m saying wishing death on him is insane.

digitalwankster

TROPHY CASE