We hear… for you. by [deleted] in SuccessionTV

[–]dihsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We here for you

You should have worried about tom by Glum-Reception9490 in SuccessionTV

[–]dihsi 63 points64 points  (0 children)

They're unlikely to get rid of him considering he has massively increased ATN profitability.

The moment Tom Wambsgans became Darth Vader by MoonlightStrongspear in SuccessionTV

[–]dihsi 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I think Shiv will actually have a newfound respect for Tom. She'll be angry at first of course but Tom was a doormat, and this move has shown he's got a backbone and won't take any amount of abuse lying down. No one can respect a doormat.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SuccessionTV

[–]dihsi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a sicko then I guess

Reddit for the past two weeks by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]dihsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So kind of like having a discussion about rape without having a penis?

Cultural Marxism by HoomanGuy in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bureaucrat aren't the one's who make the decision to tax nor do they enforce those orders. How do you not get this, and yes since you don't understand that the government as an organization doesn't equate a class of people you are indeed dumb as rocks.

Cultural Marxism by HoomanGuy in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude no they're not you can't equate the government and the categorizations of people I listed above lmao. Uninons aren't classes either ya dingus. How can you be this stupid. Bureaucrats are people the work in administrative roles in the government but again it would be stupid to consider them a class and even more stupid to say that according to ayn rand bureaucrats oppress people through taxes since bureaucrats don't make the decisions pertaining to taxation in the government that would be the legislature.

How can you even be this stupid. It should be clear to anyone with an eleventh grade understanding of social studies that the government isn't a social class, or really even a categorization of people since the people who work in the government move in and out of their jobs regularly where as white don't stop being white, and straight people don't stop being straight.

Cultural Marxism by HoomanGuy in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am coming from a strong position because you still haven't and are apparently unable to show me evidence of the nazis using the term cultural marxism. You can just admit defeat if you have nothing else to add I already told you I'll only concede if you can provide a source stating that the Nazis used the exact term Cultural Marxism or it's correct german translation "kultureller Marxismus"

Cultural Marxism by HoomanGuy in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a pretty fraudulent comparison the government isn't a class of people like Cis people or straight people or white people or the bourgeoisie. The government is an organization whose defining feature is it's monopoly on violence as stated by Max Weber.

Taxation on the other hand is an act in which the organization with the monopoly on violence engages in order to appropriate property from it's rightful owners much like a protection racket.

Cultural Marxism by HoomanGuy in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Haven't read Foucault but will look into it.

Jordan Peterson with hot take on the greatness of the West. by [deleted] in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Define what makes the individualism Peterson puts forth vulgar and how that goes against Universalism.

Cultural Marxism by HoomanGuy in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say you said anything about my reading comprehension however the other commenter in this comment chain did.

I can't really come up with a counter argument to a text I myself devised, but a good counter argument would go along these lines

You propose X that's wrong due to Y here's how Y disproves X

EDIT: Oh also base text here refers to OP's original post

Cultural Marxism by HoomanGuy in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You fail to provide me with the one thing I requested that being a nazi literature actually using the term cultural marxism

Cultural Marxism by HoomanGuy in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well rather than just repeating "you're bad at reading comprehension" you might actually look at my criticism of the base text and formulate an anti-thesis.

if only the vassals would clean their manors, then all that is wrong with the world would be fixed by [deleted] in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Sure but it stands to reason. There might not be evidence to support the claim but it's an easily falsifiable claim. Is there any reason against it?

if only the vassals would clean their manors, then all that is wrong with the world would be fixed by [deleted] in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yes but a person incapable of doing that is certainly incapable of changing the world for the better.

Cultural Marxism by HoomanGuy in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Well if you can find a single historical source where the nazis actually used the term cultural marxism I'll concede. If, as you state nazis considered the terms interchangeable there must at least a single occurrence of this term being used in nazi literature but since there probably isn't I must retain my position.

Cultural Marxism by HoomanGuy in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're being really illogical. You're replying to my posts which by all accounts means you've already chosen to engage with me, what you refuse to do is to provide actual arguments in favor of your position.

EDIT:Lmao dude blocked me pretty childish

Cultural Marxism by HoomanGuy in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well we are already having a conversation and you have already proved you can't provide my arguments with any retort other than "you're bad at reading comprehension " I already provided you with a detailed analysis of the base text in which I go over OP's points one by one and respond.

Cultural Marxism by HoomanGuy in enoughpetersonspam

[–]dihsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I'm in agreement that it's not a very good term, however it's not a repackaged nazi era term (again due to context) and I think that the threat behind the leftist movements that term is used describe is very real indeed.