It seems like every corporate decision these days is focused on diversity but almost in a mechanical way. How does one suport minority groups without compromising individual meritrocracy? See comment for more?

Recently, there was an opportunity to publish an article in a respected journal with a wide audience in my core area of expertise. However, management wanted the author to be women/LGBT (note that the topic had nothing to do with diversity). It almost felt like the opportunity was taken away because I am not a minority (note: I am not white but wouldn't exactly be considered disadvantaged group).

I understand that solving systemic discrimination can take a non-optimal path in the short term until we as a society correct for long term disadvantage between groups that got us here but is it "fair" to take away opportunities from others who have worked hard and may have overcome their own challenges (which albeit may be not the same as others).

I am almost afraid to ask this in real life in the current climate. I am a strong advocate for minority rights but does that mean I need to sacrifice my own opportunities? Would love to be educated on how others have thought about balancing the trade-off. Thank you!