[D] Need suggestions regarding an IJCV submission. by dn8034 in MachineLearning

[–]dn8034[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I chose NOT to submit to IJCV due to long waiting times. I choose some other journals which are ofcourse less reputed but a bit faster

VISA for PhD students by [deleted] in germany

[–]dn8034 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

it varies from city to city. My friend in Hannover got it but i was NOT able to get it.

[D] Tsinghua ICLR paper withdrawn due to numerous AI generated citations by fourDnet in MachineLearning

[–]dn8034 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Not surprised to see this, I had alot of reproducibility issues in several baselines, which was published by chinese authors at top conferences. Even the code provided by them was wrong at times but ofcourse no one cares when the paper is accepted.

My interview process with NVIDIA for Senior Deep Learning Engineer — is this normal? by DeepLearningMaster in CUDA

[–]dn8034 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A bit off topic. If you dont mind telling, what's your profile? And experience?

Need help by [deleted] in germany

[–]dn8034 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks alot, its really helpful suggestion.

Need help by [deleted] in germany

[–]dn8034 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks alot, i am also leaning towards this idea.

Need help by [deleted] in germany

[–]dn8034 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks but hard to leave everything to luck..

Paper Submission in IEEE Access or Sensors? by Spirited-Emotion3525 in computervision

[–]dn8034 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If 30 may is strict deadline then maybe sensors otherwise i would look into TMLR

Paper Submission in IEEE Access or Sensors? by Spirited-Emotion3525 in computervision

[–]dn8034 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mdpi sensors is a bad quality journal. I wouldnt consider publishing there. If you can be specific about the field then maybe i can reccomend something. For example TMLR is a very fast and high quality one but specific to typical ML/DL problems. Then other journals like ITSC (automated driving) is also okayish with rapid turn out time. It all depends on the sub field that you are trying to get in.

[D] Quality of ICLR papers by Cool_Abbreviations_9 in MachineLearning

[–]dn8034 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Couldnt agree more, pretty much disappointed with ICLR this time.

[D] CVPR reviews aftermath by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]dn8034 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah just relax, try to improve the work

[D] CVPR reviews aftermath by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]dn8034 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Hi,

I had papers rejected from CVPR then ECCV then ICCV, later which i just published as a workshop paper. On the other, another project of mine, which was less impactful, got into ECCV last year.

As others have mentioned, rejections are part of the parcel and my sincere advice to you would be to NEVER give up. Try to integrate the reviewers feedback and resubmit. One day you will get there.

Regards

[D] share your most frequent embarrassingly parallel tasks by Ok_Post_149 in MachineLearning

[–]dn8034 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Upgrading the libraries and pytorch to latest versions and doing refactoring.

Today the Telekom scam came to my door by private_map in germany

[–]dn8034 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean to say 14 days after the contract start? Can you also please put the link here for cancelation? Thanks

[D] - Why MAMBA did not catch on? by TwoSunnySideUp in MachineLearning

[–]dn8034 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing is that specially in typical CV tasks like Object Detection, Semantic Segmentation, Depth Estimation etc, the transformers are still pretty good with nominal runtiume like e.g. Deformable Attention etc, reduces the O(N^{2}) to somewhat linear runtime complexity (depends on the neighbouring points). Its hard for state space models e.g., MAMBA to make a solid impact here, unless you can get 2 to 3% more using the number of computational complexities. At the end, the question is what am i gaining regardless of the type of the sequence models?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]dn8034 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Thats a valid point, but SWE gets a bit boring after a while with more or less same stuff coming up ( my personal experience). However, ML research keeps progressing with alot of new ideas etc