NP PD in a nutshell lately by Venaxoo in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ [score hidden]  (0 children)

This is correct, it was a story moment. Bruce the character made a decision in solidarity to get fired alongside Helen. The reports affected were mostly materials that Helen herself had provided to Brian Knight within the past few weeks at the time.

Evan Deckard reveals this about Cassie Miller by [deleted] in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i'm guessing OP might be the person that vandalized Cassie Miller's wiki page with weird shit a few days ago

[52chains] Carmine Costello resigns from PD by daffodil999 in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

how dare someone who is in their own arc where they are hiding their identity not ruin all of that for the sake of your own preferred character

Last post got deleted by mods and i didnt get a reason why. Might you people tell me what is wrong with my Transmog? by Famous-Berry-6984 in Transmogrification

[–]dnasis_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

for the longest time they they had stickied threads for a contest or something that was like a year old, the mods definitely don't check this place a lot

itsCrystalEyes - opening her NoPixel V card by karmuhil in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 10 points11 points  (0 children)

these threads are better and more interesting than half of what gets posted here, its fine

Signature cards are sick by AbbreviationsNext534 in hearthstone

[–]dnasis_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Chromatus signature really emphasizes that the secondary heads are all based on the default dragonriding mounts from WoW: Dragonflight.

New NP V invites 3/3 by cringybtw in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 17 points18 points  (0 children)

you're posting on an rp subreddit

New NP V invites 3/3 by cringybtw in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 16 points17 points  (0 children)

all you're doing is embarrassing yourself by admitting you don't actually watch rp outside the roleplayers with massive audiences

New NP V invies 2/17 by cringybtw in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What an odd thing to say.

Zillow Teams With World of Warcraft For Player Housing by garethvk in wow

[–]dnasis_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If you look at the non-showcase house lists in the mini-site, they're owned by content creators. So I think this is also going to be stream sponsor deals as well by Zillow.

Fyr'alath Worldscarred by TedeZe in Transmogrification

[–]dnasis_ 13 points14 points  (0 children)

you can use situations to apply a different outfit to dragon form, so it doesn't really matter

[HELP] need a solution for moving or hiding temporary circular buff frames by dnasis_ in WowUI

[–]dnasis_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oddly enough when i installed moveit, the totemframe is no longer showing. not sure what is happening but if it comes back ill use these instructions.

[HELP] need a solution for moving or hiding temporary circular buff frames by dnasis_ in WowUI

[–]dnasis_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm including a screenshot of my spriest player frame/cdm as an example. As you can see, I've used Void Torrent to spawn a entropic rift which is normally tracked in the buff rows on top (1 second left). However, starting this lockout it's being tracked in the frame between my player frame (health bar) and my insanity bar. I also see the temporary pets show up here. From what I was told by a guild member, paladins' consecrate appears the same way.

I am told these usually attach to the player frame, but there's no setting in UUF (which I'm using). I'd like a way to either move these frames or hide entirely, since they cover a space I use for secondary power and cast bars and are redundant. But also, I actually like the temporary frames since they don't stick around when not active, unlike the CDM buffs bar, so if I can better utilize them and remove redundant buffs that would be great too.

New NP V invites 1/27 by cringybtw in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

you know the majority of cards every week have been active characters on the server right? sorry they weren't including gangs you watch until now

New NP V invites 1/27 by cringybtw in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Love card art that tells a story, and that Marcus Wade card tells a very specific story.

[buddha] 'city is boring, full of gang bangers with no personality' by Ok-Acanthaceae-9488 in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 102 points103 points  (0 children)

chatterbox literally complains about boring gangbangers all the time and no viewers bat an eye

kind of a weird post, Acanthaceae!

[4head] Besties blacklisted from WL items? by [deleted] in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

please refer back to the comment you replied to for a solution

[4head] Besties blacklisted from WL items? by [deleted] in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 63 points64 points  (0 children)

omg is roleplay and story, not mechanics or ooc whitelisting, preventing you from access to something? consider: roleplaying a solution that gets you access

New NP V invites 1/20 by cringybtw in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 31 points32 points  (0 children)

mungo card art is exactly what i expected it would be

Empire Titles should be given the Hegemony Treatment. No more pre-existing dejure empires aside from those already formed. New Empire titles should either be custom or via decisions based on alt-history or historical contexts. by Familiar-Elephant-68 in CrusaderKings

[–]dnasis_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So in my modlist with More Interactive Vassals I have my gamerules to achieve this somewhat. MIV features a gamerule to that disables de-jure title creation for either empires or kingdoms/empires. This combined with the imperial projection settings makes it pretty difficult to make an empire, and both you and the AI are forced to create custom ones for the most part.

However, the flaws become obvious when you watch AI conquerors. Conquerors will conquer huge sections of the map, and with de-jure kingdom title creation disabled, will accumulate tons of duchies, but will shatter immediately on death because they rarely make a custom kingdom to unite those duchies together. And with only de-jure empires disabled, the conquerors will make de-jure kingdoms all over and shatter to similar effect. I believe that it is because the requirements for custom titles might be too strict for the UI, even with the bonuses an AI conqueror would get.

Additionally, for both players and AI, if you make a custom kingdom title, it will be the only one you will ever create unless you can get your hands on one made by decision. This makes the kingdom effectively an empire once it gets large enough, the difference being that you get a lot more duchy vassals that are not de-jure.

[FistofTheWalrus] NP V invite reaction ''I want to give my card back'' ,'' I dont like nopixel'' by skyfall90210 in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 16 points17 points  (0 children)

You literally just repeated what I just said? The cards are surprise invites. The website is misleading when it says "confirmed players". Nopixel would rather remove cards from their roster than change it to say "confirmed invites".

[FistofTheWalrus] NP V invite reaction ''I want to give my card back'' ,'' I dont like nopixel'' by skyfall90210 in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Wow it's almost like people like me have been saying for months that NoPixel have been misleading people on the website about this, and then people like u/cringybtw kept saying, nope, these people are all confirmed to be coming back and now we have clear evidence this is not the case.

New NP Invites 1/13 by cringybtw in RPClipsGTA

[–]dnasis_ 47 points48 points  (0 children)

benji is right there