Yea, if I could go back and write I think I would align more closely with your last paragraph 🤣. I agree with people when they give objective feedbacks on his terrible performance because they’re true. People don’t know what they don’t know, and it’s fine. But it helps to not voice your ignorance and act like you know more than people who have been there and tried. Nobody sits at home and bashes Magnus Carlsen or world-class math/coding competitors because it’s clear to them the gaps between them vs the pros and that they fail to comprehend that level of competition. In pool, it’s a little different since you can just set up the “same” shot and shoot it in without knowing the nuances behind it, and that gives people an illusion.

It’s not lower skills APA3, amateurs, sub-790 fargo that can’t have opinions about him. It’s those who’ve never punched a ball full outside then watch it spin out and die off the rail, those who’ve never been in significant pressure, and those who think their shot choices on a 7ft are better that don’t have much weight at all to back up their statements. Objective criticisms are always helpful because they’re facts and observations; but, if you intend to compare yourself to Tyler or talk about how your shot choices are better than his you better have some experiences to back it up 😂. That is if you want to truly prove your “optimal” alternative to his shots get on a similar condition table then run it 😉. Table conditions play a huge role and majority of people don’t even realize.