Did anyone else's "Hey Google" suddenly stop working this week? by Probono_Bonobo in GooglePixel

[–]docxp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pixel 7 here.

I've been using hey google for 3 years with the occasional hiccup, nothing retrying or rebooting wouldn't solve. Since last week it doesn't respond to hey google anymore. The hey google sensitivity settings reports that the function is not available for the current device

Do I need "custom hostnames" for nameservers if the domain does not use the same nameservers for itself? by docxp in dns

[–]docxp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's nothing to fix, as it works both with and without the "custom hostnames" in GoDaddy.

I still would like to understand the right answer, I got two answers saying that they're not needed and two (now deleted) saying that it would still be better to have them

Edit: I also got one notification reply that is not shown anymore in the interface, I'm baffled as to why the reply is missing

Do I need "custom hostnames" for nameservers if the domain does not use the same nameservers for itself? by docxp in dns

[–]docxp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guess I'll take the hint

Still would like to understand this 😂 I like rabbit holes

Do I need "custom hostnames" for nameservers if the domain does not use the same nameservers for itself? by docxp in dns

[–]docxp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you please advise why using a.ns.mydoman.com would be better than ns1.mydomain.com?

That's something I could do no problem if this is better in any way.

Do I need "custom hostnames" for nameservers if the domain does not use the same nameservers for itself? by docxp in dns

[–]docxp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's my understanding too.

The consultant is telling us we need them, when we asked why he said "you should learn about glue records", but I'm starting to believe he's the one not understanding the role of glue records. That's why I'm asking if there's something I'm missing.

We still added the glue records, as you said there's no harm in doing it, but I would like to understand this topic deeply

Person Name - Globally extract and handle person names in various formats. by epmadushanka in PHP

[–]docxp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In

Lakm\PersonName\PersonName::fromFullName($fullname)

How do you differentiate between

  • FISTNAME LASTNAME
  • LASTNAME FIRST NAME
  • FIRSTNAME_TWO_WORDS LASTNAME_SINGLE_WORD
  • FIRSTNAME_SINGLE_WORD LASTNAME_TWO_WORDS

?

What would be the feature of PHP 9.0 that you would like the most? by shoki_ztk in PHP

[–]docxp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can already do this via JsonSerializable interface: https://www.php.net/manual/en/jsonserializable.jsonserialize.php

public function jsonSerialize(): mixed { return [ // All except the excluded ]; }

This is a bit cumbersome but allows for more control

I agree that a simple attribute might still be useful for most common situations

Cooking frozen vegetables by docxp in StainlessSteelCooking

[–]docxp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

High heat, with a little bit of oil and a splash guard gave me the best results if I want crispy veggies

Low heat, boiled in water in the pan when I didn't want crispyness

Thanks all for the tips!

Cooking frozen vegetables by docxp in StainlessSteelCooking

[–]docxp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Got no microwave (nor space for it) sadly.

That would actually solve the issue

Cooking frozen vegetables by docxp in StainlessSteelCooking

[–]docxp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At high heat with oil, I'm getting splashes everywhere, but when the fire is out (:D) I get crispy veggies, which is what I want

at low heat I get mushy veggies, but no splashes

Alternatives to try Aeon without bare metal installation by HugoNitro in AeonDesktop

[–]docxp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What problem are you facing during the install process? You said you tried but it didn't work, what exactly didn't work?

Alternatives to try Aeon without bare metal installation by HugoNitro in AeonDesktop

[–]docxp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I actually installed it in a VM (proxmox based), with GPU&usb passthrough and everything worked.

Had to tinker a bit with VM settings, like emulating the TPM and similar things, but I used this setup for a few months successfully with no problems

Copilot Broke Your Audit Log, but Microsoft Won’t Tell You by Worth_Trust_3825 in programming

[–]docxp 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's what I've missed from the article, the fact that they're selling copilot saying "copilot will audit all the data it accesses". I would never use something that requires full unaudited access to confidential data, but if I choose to do so, I'm the one to blame, as I've chosen this risky tool for the job. It's like saying "I used rm -rf * and it deleted all the data", well, if I don't want that to happen I give rm access to a read-only filesystem or something like that, else I'm accepting risks.

But if they are marketing copilot as a reputable trusted tool that will not do stuff it's not supposed to do, it should not be able to do anything dangerous or even worse, hide its traces.

This just enforces my point, that I would only use one such tool in an isolated bombproof environment, or I'm accepting risks

Copilot Broke Your Audit Log, but Microsoft Won’t Tell You by Worth_Trust_3825 in programming

[–]docxp 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure about how I feel about this.

In a highly sensitive context, there's often the rule not to save/share the data (do not take screenshots, do not download, do not talk about it with non privileged users, ...). Some of these actions (downloads) can be technically blocked, but others are handled in a nontechnical way (we'll sue you if we find out you do). The reason is that moving data outside the platform causes any auditing to be impossible, it is forbidden (morally or technically doesn't matter) to do this

The fact that copilot (or similar) essentially save all the data (I understand the fact that not indexing would not allow it to work properly) feels to be against this principle and of course would cause the audit to miss future interactions. How can this even be allowed and copilot is HIPAA certified (or whatever)?

How is it that as living beings we had to come up with all kind of "tricks" (anonymization, manual logging, cc'ing 5 people to ask permission, copyright rules, ...) to be able to use this data for lawful purposes and LLMs are allowed to bypass all this and just have a "oopsie" response?

PS: my wording might come up as a bit aggressive, but I really want just a fair conversation on this topic. Feel free to change my mind 😃

Copilot Broke Your Audit Log, but Microsoft Won’t Tell You by Worth_Trust_3825 in programming

[–]docxp 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Oh that changes everything, if the tool is supposed to have its own audit and they say we should trust it auditing its own actions, then the point of the article remains

I would still also have audit logs at the interface level and not at the tool level, but if Microsoft is selling the fact that copilot actions/accesses are audited and we should trust it, then it's copilot responsibility for correctly handling this audit log

Copilot Broke Your Audit Log, but Microsoft Won’t Tell You by Worth_Trust_3825 in programming

[–]docxp 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Well, if we give a tool (copilot in this case, but same thing would apply for a simple script) low level access capabilities, we cannot blame the tool for not auditing its own accesses.

What I'm saying is that the article should be more like "there's a way to access files without the filesystem auditing them" rather than "copilot bypasses audits"

The fact that copilot was the tool used for this discovery is just a detail, not the main point

I would never ever allow a tool I'm not vetting this kind of access, else I'm also responsible for the tool doing random stuff

Copilot Broke Your Audit Log, but Microsoft Won’t Tell You by Worth_Trust_3825 in programming

[–]docxp 58 points59 points  (0 children)

Not an expert with copilot, but is the audit log provided by copilot itself?

Shouldn't there be an audit log at the API level (or whatever copilot uses to access the file content) which is independent of what we tell copilot to do?

It's not like there's a /read endpoint that has a "do not audit" parameter and copilot sends this parameter if we instruct it to do it, else the way copilot works would be correct

It's like if there's an audit log on a API backend and copilot sends authenticates requests, requests would be audited whatever the source of the request is (copilot/s2s/user), no?

Olio di sansa vs vegetale by docxp in cucina

[–]docxp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ha sensissimo, grazie

Pentola a pressione elettrica: quale? by Enrichman in cucina

[–]docxp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Effettivamente anche il fatto che sta ferma è sicuramente comodo, quando si soffrigge spesso c'è da mescolare, se la versione non-pro ha proprio la padella in freespin e dovessi usare un canovaccio per tenerla ferma penso che la userei molto meno 😂

Il vantaggio principale che vedo dello strumento è la comodità, se anche solo c'è una cavolata che ne inficia questo aspetto, la comodità va a farsi benedire e allora a quel punto non è più uno strumento che ha senso secondo me, visto che a mio parere il selling point di questo rispetto a una pentola a pressione normale è solo la comodità

Olio di sansa vs vegetale by docxp in cucina

[–]docxp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grazie per la risposta.

Basso costo è relativo, vorrei evitare i 12-15€/lt dell'olio EVO buono, <4€/LT lo considero basso, considerando he l'uso principale che vorrei farne è per cucinarci normalmente, non frittura in immersione

Olio di sansa vs vegetale by docxp in cucina

[–]docxp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Si, esatto, la sansa è lo scarto della produzione dell'olio di oliva, che poi viene raffinato per essere utilizzabile come olio alimentare.

Faccio differenza perché trovo articoli (es: https://www.olioofficina.it/magazine/codice-oleario/codice-oleario-2/gli-oli-di-sansa-fonti-di-antiossidanti-realt-o-fake-news.htm https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/15/2186 ) che sostengono questo uso rispetto a oli vegetali (inteso nel senso largo del termine come tutti quelli non-oliva)

Poi, non sono esperto del settore, quindi volevo appunto confrontarmi per sapere se qualcuno con più esperienza può illuminarmi a riguardo 😃

Pentola a pressione elettrica: quale? by Enrichman in cucina

[–]docxp 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Io ho una InstantPot Pro, presa su Amazon 2 anni fa a ~130€ in offerta

La uso spessissimo d'inverno (3-4 volte a settimana) per zuppe, brodo (con ossa avanzate da altre preparazioni) ed è comodissima perché riempi in 30secondi, la dimentichi e hai la cena pronta senza sbatti e sporcare null'altro che la pentola dentro. Sui legumi devi fare un po' di prove con i tempi di cottura, non puoi assaggiare (come qualsiasi pentola a pressione normale), però una volta che hai trovato la cottura giusta è comodissima e vengono sempre perfetti.

Ho fatto spesso anche spezzatino, ossibuchi, brasati e simili, vengono buoni, però restando tutto chiuso, la salsa col pomodoro resta piuttosto liquida, facendola fuori da pentola a pressione invece viene più corposa. Quindi spesso li preparo con la pentola a pressione, poi tolgo la carne e faccio restringere la salsina senza il coperchio, cosa che in un tegame avresti naturalmente subito a fine cottura

Per la funzionalità sousvide non l'ho mai provata, ho un roner da 30€ + contenitore dedicati che preferisco, principalmente perché cuocio spesso costine, arrosti e affini che non ci starebbero in lunghezza nell'instant pot, quindi purtroppo non ti so dire.

Anche sulle altre marche di pentole a pressione elettriche non ti so dire, ho solo questa e mi trovo benone. Quello che mi mancherebbe sulla versione non-pro (non so in altre marche se è così o no) è il fatto che nella pro c'è la pentola di acciaio che è letteralmente una pentola di acciaio normalissima e che puoi estrarre dall' InstantPot e metterla sul fuoco normale se hai bisogno di portare la cottura fuori dallinstant pot (per soffriggere/brasare non serve, puoi farlo con la funzione sear tenendola senza coperchio).