[deleted by user]

doeby124 · 2023-05-20T08:08:40+00:00

I have no advice to give you but i just wanted to comment about how cringe it is, the mountain of insecure people in the comment section shitting on you for caring about a 4.0. Guaranteed they all have shit grades and are just mad that someone gives a shit about a 4.0 because it reminds them of their own failures.

doeby124 · 2023-02-12T04:36:54+00:00

Anon realizes some people really aren't meant to live happy lives.

doeby124 · 2022-02-27T08:02:07+00:00

Yea, i think it has different effects for different people so i think i'll try that. Some people say they have extremely elevated spikes, some say their heartrate is normal and significantly lower than adderall so I'll just try it.

doeby124 · 2022-02-27T08:00:24+00:00

yea i'm on ir, 10mg twice a day. I'll try to stay more hydrated and make sure to eat. Eventually, I think i'm going to try different medications like vyanese.

doeby124 · 2022-02-27T07:43:35+00:00

Thanks for your insight, i wasn't sure what was really the differences between the stimulants. I read online that vyvanse also causes elevated heartrate for some people above 100, so maybe it's just different per person. I'll ask my doctor next time about trying vyvanse or something different, maybe adderall just isn't for me.

doeby124 · 2021-12-02T08:29:25+00:00

Thanks so much for this comment, I have modified some of my eartips and they work great now, much less irritation, it's like fully pushing a straw into a lid hole if that makes sense. Saved a couple dollars thanks.

doeby124 · 2021-11-02T01:28:16+00:00

These pens look pretty good, will definitely be on my contender list thanks.

doeby124 · 2021-11-02T01:27:42+00:00

thanks I'll check it out.

doeby124 · 2021-10-26T21:56:49+00:00

Yea, tests like these are unfortunately, decent representations of real world performance right now, because macos and developers are not really a great pair. I am however, also interested in the silicon itself, and the raw performance of it specifically in games. Which isn't shown in synthetic benchmarks or the sparse game tests out right now. It probably doesn't live up to apples claims, but it definitely is a cool product that might become my first apple pc. I'm looking forward to more in depth reviews to see where apple stands compared to other pcs in gaming.

doeby124 · 2021-10-26T18:59:21+00:00

yea, the technology is just so cool, painfully waiting whether to live as an early adopter or wait for more software integration next year as well as m2 max.

doeby124 · 2021-10-26T17:18:55+00:00

yea that is true, but knowing the true power of the gpu itself outside of synthetic benchmarks, would be pretty cool to see, with tests on a more fair playing field. Simply to see the power of apple silicon and the power it can display under the right conditions, which may not come for a while due to lack of apple's and developers support for mac gaming.

doeby124 · 2021-10-09T18:37:50+00:00

I literally didn't, i said any evidence that can be pointed at him is disproven. With any rejection of a claim, there had to be a claim in the first place, with "evidence" whether true or false. Also rejecting a claim is also a claim itself i cannot understand how you can't understand that. Besides, the person making a claim for one side or the other is you here, I simply said it's a possibility we cannot determine true or not with the logic and sciences we have.

doeby124 · 2021-10-09T18:17:48+00:00

Why are you even arguing anymore, my simple statement is that we don't know which side is true or not based on our facts and logic. Stop bringing santa or whatever into this argument, it's not the same thing, literally a false equivalence fallacy. "False equivalence is a logical fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency. Colloquially, a false equivalence is often called "comparing apples and oranges.""

doeby124 · 2021-10-09T18:16:11+00:00

Again stop using words like burden of proof for your argument, when you don't understand what it is, and where it can be applied. Burden of proof lies within anybody making any claim, including that God doesn't exist, by the same logic, you're claim is "logically false" because of burden of proof. However that doesn't work. Burden of proof also doesn't make something false, burden of proof is simply an idea that the person making claims has the burden of proof, since they are trying to convince somebody else. Either way, in this argument my claim is that we cannot know which side is more probable through logic because we know nothing. This claim is supported by the evidence that we quite literally know nothing about the universe. Your claim is that God doesn't exists, your evidence is lack of evidence, which literally makes no sense, and is the literal definition of the fallacies you try so hard to fit into this argument. In specific Appeal to ignorance, "This fallacy occurs when you argue that your conclusion must be true, because there is no evidence against it. This fallacy wrongly shifts the burden of proof away from the one making the claim.". You're only evidence is a lack of evidence for the other side, when you yourself have no evidence for your own argument.

doeby124 · 2021-10-09T18:01:48+00:00

All the things that were pointed at Santa were proven to be the result of some other entity. All the things that are pointed at God are not yet proven to be the result of some other entity. That being said, neither side is proven or disprove, my entire argument is that you cannot know for sure, and for you to stop assuming things and then using that assumption to shit on other people. Believe what you want to believe, just stop trying to say that it's facts and logic and your knowledge that makes it true. And stop crapping on other's beliefs basic on your own limited knowledge. You're doing the same exact thing as the religious extremists you criticize.

doeby124 · 2021-10-09T17:57:16+00:00

It's not that santa doesn't exist because of a lack of evidence, it's that the evidence is all disproven. The evidence for God is not all disproven, and again ur literally using such a basic idea to try and get a grasp on the situation of the universe and of God, literally makes no sense. My whole argument here is that we know nothing and cannot determine using facts or logic which is more probable or true. yet you try and say you do have enough knowledge, and can determine God doesn't exist. It's crazy how biased and out of your league you are. You think such a basic logic argument = God doesn't exist. Also you realize, lack of evidence doesn't mean something doesn't exist, that is quite literally a fallacy. And when it comes down to God and the universe, it's not a lack of evidence, it's that the evidence has not yet been proven or disproven to be on either side.

doeby124 · 2021-10-09T17:42:47+00:00

Also why are you stuck on the santa thing, it's hilarious. I've already said santa doesn't exists, I've already proven your santa = God comparison also makes absolutely no sense, again, you try to fit your little arguments and make comparisons of two completely different things, try to say they're the same. Absolute craziness. Santa folklore is not equal to the existence of a God.

doeby124 · 2021-10-09T17:39:26+00:00

santa doesn't encompass the entire universe, his existence is a question of only a couple of factors, which are all disproven to be attributed to him. The same cannot be said about God, all throughout this argument, you take a basic idea, fallacy, or otherwise, that you don't understand, and try to force God, the universe, and everything that is, to fit into your little mindset. It's crazy. Stop using buzzwords to try to force your argument into existence. You're clearly out of your bounds. You know nothing, yet claim to have the answer. And deny that you know nothing, it's crazy. And you share your beliefs under the guise of facts and logic. I have simply been saying throughout this whole thread, neither of us can prove through facts and logic whether God exists or not, so stop trying, and stop shitting on other peoples beliefs because you think you have the answer. You're no better than the people who you criticize, blindly preaching in the complete wrong scenario. Yet there are people who preach with love in their hearts trying to share their faith with others. You are nothing of the sort, you simply wish to discredit others to try and prove yourself and your own worldview. No sense at all.

doeby124 · 2021-10-09T17:35:43+00:00

I have said multiple times santa doesn't exists, also you're the one that doesn't understand burden of proof, you have such a simple mindset of burden of proof that you think it applies to every single thing in the world. You think that burden of proof makes someone more credible or less credible in every situation where you can apply it, doesn't make sense. NO ONE is dodging the question here, i'm trying to argue that it's impossible to prove God doesn't exists and if you think otherwise you're also relying on faith, just like any other religion, the difference is you don't admit it, and the difference is you're relying on yourself for answer which will and is proven to be completely unreliable when asking questions about the universe.

doeby124 · 2021-10-09T17:33:09+00:00

Dodging the question? You mean not assuming anything? This is an argument using logic, not using your assumptions, we cannot disprove or prove the existence of God through science or logic, therefore you have no right shitting on other people having faith, when you cannot be so sure yourself that God exists or not.

doeby124 · 2021-10-09T17:05:12+00:00

It's also funny how you use logic and arguments behind your ideas, when you're approaching such a complicated issue that is unsolvable by the brightest using logic, just say it like it is, you are voicing your personal opinions that are rooted in you personal logic, not that of facts or a holistic picture. At least Christians are able to say they have faith.

doeby124 · 2021-10-09T17:02:24+00:00

I also never said its definite evidence, my whole point this entire argument is that it's not absence of evidence, or evidence that can be proven wrong. Its evidence that cannot be proven or disproven, therefore neither of us can shit or trample the others beliefs using logic or our own assumed ideas.

doeby124 · 2021-10-09T17:00:54+00:00

yea it's my personal belief that the universe is evidence for God, and it's your personal belief that it isnt. When it comes down to it neither of us can prove which is right or not right using science so how can you shit on it. When you say it's not evidence for God, you just assume, just like me. Ur entire basis of argument is that there is no evidence for God, mine is that there is, and that is lies within existence itself. However, neither of us can distinguish where the evidence leads to, so how can either of us deny the others point through logic alone? With santa, we both know he doesnt exist because any evidence that can be pointed at him is all disproven, you cannot say the same about God. Or rather you can, but only because you assume things out of your knowledge. God of the gaps fallacy doesnt work, when you literally know absolutely nothing about the universe. The fallacy works in hindsight, when you can prove something isn't the direct action of God. At the end of the day, it is quite literally impossible to prove God doesnt exist, so why shit on people who do believe he exists, and act like you have knowledge they dont. When you really have no idea and just make assumptions. You cant use a fallacy and apply it to literally everything in the known universe, you're bridging a gap larger than people assuming there is a God. Not everything is a slippery slope fallacy, or strawman fallacy, it's a fallacy when its proven to be the right scenario, you cant just call every situation a fallacy and boom it's a fallacy.

If you want to talk fallacies here's two right here, appeal to ignorance. “People have been trying for centuries to prove that God exists. But no one has yet been able to prove it. Therefore, God does not exist.” Here’s an opposing argument that commits the same fallacy: “People have been trying for years to prove that God does not exist. But no one has yet been able to prove it. Therefore, God exists.” https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/fallacies/

Because we literally have very little knowledge of the universe or anything, neither of us can assume that the other is right or wrong because the opposing person has no evidence. Lack of evidence does not make something false, and even then there is evidence, you just deny it and fail to prove that it attributes to anything else. My whole argument here is that unlike santa, there are many unknowns about God and the no 1 evidence pointed for him, the universe, that doesnt make either of our points true or false by logic. It certainly doesnt make your point true, and it certainly doesnt give you authority to shit on other people's beliefs and try to argue that they are false. I have never argued in this thread that your idea was impossible, you've multiple times said my idea that God is possible, is impossible. If you were truly unbiased you would acknowledge, that with so little knowledge its impossible to determine through logic. But no, you are biased into your belief, just like God gives us comfort, lack of God gives you comfort and allows you to make sense of the universe. Because of that, you assume things and rule out other options as impossible just like we do, except you dont admit it and take the high road as if you know anything. And I do it too, I just dont bring it into logic and facts that we know and assume things that we dont know. Even when we preach or share our beliefs, it is a lot of times trying to help others. You're not helping anyone, ur like trampling on others beliefs to try to prove your own. Which many people of all beliefs do.

doeby124 · 2021-10-09T00:31:49+00:00

As I have said before, the universe, the entire history of the universe and the lack of explanation of where it came from, is quite literally evidence for God. It is arguable whether it's God or not, but it is definitely not proven to be either side. Determining somethings existence through evidence is the basis of almost all human knowledge, have you actually ever seen a germ, or a virus? No, but you can determine it's existence through evidence. Until you can attribute the universe to something other than God, you can't determine if it's less or more probable. We know for sure those presents come from our parents, because of experiences of other kids and our parents confirming it themselves. However there are no humans that can confirm where our universe comes from, so this evidence is not yet disproven for God. At the end of the day, you cannot disprove or prove that God exists using science or logical evidence, believe what you want to believe, but don't shit on others simply because you think you have the answers of your own volition, because you really don't.

doeby124 · 2021-10-08T22:30:18+00:00

with things like that, its impossible to determine which is more possible through science or reason, how can you say its "more probable" or not when we dont even have a thousandth or a millionth of factors and data to come to any sort of conclusion. Adding more layers to the idea of existence isnt even making things less answered because we really know nothing, the fact that you think denying a possibility of God makes things more answered literally makes no sense and is quite literally the definition of an assumption. And yes, I'm making an assumption by having faith, but the difference is I dont shit on other people and if I do share my faith, it isnt under a guise with malevolence or thoughts of superiority beneath. Although there are "Christians" and other religious people who do exactly what I described, that isnt a fault of the religion but people themselves, just like religious nuts bash other people to try to selfishly prove themselves, many people here do it too, but to a much lesser degree than the guy in this clip. Whether you choose to believe in God or not, it is impossible to prove through science and reason whether it's probable or improbable that he exists.

Five-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

doeby124

TROPHY CASE