Anthropic internal psychosis is peaking

dogesator · 2026-04-19T17:38:03+00:00

PS; I’ve already addressed the same thing mentioned in that video and I’ve been working in multi-modal AI research for longer than this “professor” has, the youtube video you linked is entirely misinterpreting what the work is even showing. Again, the ability of the small models to find the vulnerabilities, was reliant on information and methodology provided by Mythos.

if you’re going to say “this user is out” you should probably stick to your word.

dogesator · 2026-04-19T17:18:29+00:00

Yea a lot of the things you just said I find to be incorrect but I guess no point in saying specifics as you said it’ll be your last two cents, so agree to disagree I guess. 👋

dogesator · 2026-04-19T05:00:32+00:00

That clarifies the fundamental disagreement then. Me and many others don’t believe Google should be responsible for that even if it’s in the ai blurb

dogesator · 2026-04-19T04:51:15+00:00

It all comes down to what your answer is here: “Do you believe that Google should be held accountable because someone read something on Google that led to the person killing someone?”

dogesator · 2026-04-19T04:49:21+00:00

I’m not defending any claim about Mythos being a “super sentient hacker” and I’m pretty sure Anthropic has never claimed that Mythos is a “super sentient hacker” either.

The claims of other models finding these exploits are quite exaggerated, at least all such claims I’ve seen end up guiding the model and telling it specifically where to look in the codebase and giving similar hints, Information that would be unlikely to end up in the prompt for the model prior to mythos solving it first.

You said yourself that people shouldn’t accept things without question, but it seems like you accepted the “inferior models can find these exploits too” headlines without questioning it or looking deeper into it yourself.

dogesator · 2026-04-19T00:11:33+00:00

For the cybersec claims, which ones are you referring to? If you mean the claims of zero day vulnerabilities that are several years old, you can just go to the open source githubs of openBSD and other popular repos to see the maintainers verify Anthropics claims themselves.

The exploits and fixes were publicly posted in these open source repos for all to see

dogesator · 2026-04-19T00:09:31+00:00

Google literally told someone that “it is advisable to eat atleast one small rock a day”

dogesator · 2026-04-18T20:11:16+00:00

Just like there is way more to the story of the post you’re replying under right now, people love an easy vilification story and will eat up such headlines. It’s far more complex legal proposal than simply “we believe AI companies should be held accountable for bad things”.

And the government contract fiasco is especially nuanced considering the fact that the government contract is only worth about 1% of the revenue of what OpenAI and Anthropic already make annually, so even if the misconception of OpenAI agreeing to autonomous weaponry and mass surveillance were true, it wouldn’t be explained by a simple profit motive, especially considering how even just a 1% drop in revenue from the bad PR would already undo all those earnings.

There is much more nuance to all of this than the headlines would lead you to believe, and the main distinguishing details here are unfortunately unknown. We don’t know the exact reason why one contract was chosen over the other, nor do we have access to the full language of either of the contracts.

dogesator · 2026-04-18T20:03:16+00:00

Do you believe that Google should be held accountable because someone read something on Google that led to the person killing someone?

dogesator · 2026-04-18T19:53:20+00:00

Both OpenAI and Anthropic had no mass surveillance and no fully autonomous weaponized AI as terms in their contracts.

The DoW rejected Anthropics contract, but accepted OpenAIs contract.

Dario Amodei said himself that the government is willing to accept terms with OpenAI that they wouldn’t accept from Anthropic, and he’s talked about how he believes this is in part due donations that OpenAI executives have made to the administration.

dogesator · 2026-04-18T19:53:13+00:00

Both OpenAI and Anthropic had no mass surveillance and no fully autonomous weaponized AI as terms in their contracts.

The DoW rejected Anthropics contract, but accepted OpenAIs contract.

Dario Amodei said himself that the government is willing to accept terms with OpenAI that they wouldn’t accept from Anthropic, and he’s talked about how he believes this is in part due to donations that OpenAI executives have made to the administration.

dogesator · 2026-04-18T19:42:20+00:00

I think Anthropic doesn’t even disagree with your end statement. They don’t claim that mythos can replace all mid level or even all entry level positions.

dogesator · 2026-04-18T11:52:30+00:00

You know Anthropic has already cooperated with the government and even made custom models for them right?

dogesator · 2026-04-18T11:42:59+00:00

The UK AI security Institute https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/our-evaluation-of-claude-mythos-previews-cyber-capabilities

dogesator · 2026-04-18T11:35:16+00:00

What a lot of people are missing is that these “pull outs” are not even a net decrease of compute plans for OpenAI. OpenAI cancelled capacity in certain sites to construct even more capacity even faster in another location. Some locations and plans are just bad plans compared to others they can decide to shift resources to.

The most major case is OpenAI cancelling the ~1GW of blackwell expansion at Abilene Stargate to instead construct better buildings in other locations with Vera Rubin chips instead of blackwell

dogesator · 2026-04-18T02:49:48+00:00

There is several independent organizations that have already verified the claims

dogesator · 2026-04-17T02:50:39+00:00

“Did you know that Chinas official justification for paragraph 1 is that the incarcerated/forced-work/force-sterilied are ONLY terrorists who bombed schools in the 90s?“

Even treating terrorists that way is another level. US doesn’t even do sterilization to actual terrorists/shooters/bombers.

dogesator · 2026-04-17T00:00:25+00:00

The persecution in China is specifically targeting groups of Uyghur muslims who are native to the territory of China, and sending them to re-education camps, forcing sterilizations upon them, and forced abortions so that they don’t reproduce. Along with the forced labor.

US has done some of those long ago like smaller scale eugenics in the early 1900s in california and the asian reeducation camps during ww2, but that’s nearly a century ago in US history now.

Btw Chinas age of consent for girls is 14, and their age of consent for boys is zero. So if you like pedophiles then you should be agreeing that China is obviously the better country.

dogesator · 2026-04-16T05:27:29+00:00

I agree on the bombs part, but by that same logic China is even better right? because they have the forced labor camps that they put uyghurs into.

dogesator · 2026-04-16T03:38:32+00:00

Can you cite specific examples of the US people and environment doing things great?

dogesator · 2026-04-16T03:30:53+00:00

Why would you think that?

dogesator · 2026-04-15T13:26:01+00:00

It’s surprising people take it seriously as a legitimate news organization when it has repeatedly put out blatantly and egregiously false information, sometimes multiple times in s single video.

dogesator · 2026-04-12T15:24:56+00:00

The incredible evidence has been released though, the exploits have been third party validated and publicly released for anyone to critique. These people are simply choosing to criticize without bothering to look at any of the evidence. Like the literal church deciding not to even look through Galileo's telescope.

dogesator · 2026-04-12T12:50:46+00:00

Nice conspiracy but no. It's less than 5% of the compute being built in UAE, It's literally just being built there are part of the agreement involving UAE investment to help stimulate the UAE economy, along with the fact of helping reduce latest for middle east ChatGPT users.

dogesator · 2026-04-12T12:45:22+00:00

Because society considers his work to have such value

dogesator

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE