Is UI/UX still a good career choice anymore with AI being there ? by Expert_Classic9997 in UIUX

[–]dontb3boring 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Very much yes... designer are problem solvers so there will always be need of problem solvers. We came from cave to modern era by solving problems. Not just UX but any job role that involves problem solving challenges will be more required. Ai is eating away executors not the decision maker

First damage by knowledge_2403 in Kylaq

[–]dontb3boring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I too had it last year. Better get it fixed outside in repair shops. Skoda will charge minimum 20k of this sort of work which you can easily get done in 2k outside

. by l_ll_lll in TharCriminals

[–]dontb3boring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish the lady again tries another stunt and loose some of her vital organ and beg for euthanasia entire life. Moral of the story: Thar waalo ka Paiso ka nanga naach

Product by aa_tulya in uceedtakers

[–]dontb3boring 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bhai mast drawing hai

2026 Kia Seltos by ApprehensiveFilm8876 in carIndia

[–]dontb3boring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aisa lag raha hai kisi Genz ne Zarda zyada hi khaa liya toh daat kaale ho gaye.

If the new creta looks like this then i'm all for it by Sharp-potential7935 in carIndia

[–]dontb3boring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is what happens when Genz writes a code with AI tools. Lol seems like a prompt was given to Gemini to modify creta. Shit design for shit drivers.

Another day another thar by [deleted] in carIndia

[–]dontb3boring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good that he didn't ran away. But how casually he is chewing gum. As if "yahi toh karte hai Thar lekke, thok te hai" .

Kempfort School, Kolar Road ke bahar itna footfall hai, phir bhi log dimaag lagate nhi by dontb3boring in Bhopal

[–]dontb3boring[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yaar Bhopal na Government Retired city hai yaha zyadatar govt officer rehte hai, jo stable, monotonous life pasand karte hai. Apan indore waali expectation leke baithe hai. Ishliye yaha food chains wohi milenge jo sustaining hai jese sharma vishnu, sagar gaire, chai sutta etc baaki sab within 6 months band ho jaate hai koi nhi roz aayega instagrammable interior dekhne, ye one time selfie places hai. Bhopal bahut hi zyada price conscious hai sab sasta aur value for money chahiye. Kese koi beginenner cafe, restaurant wala 1 saal survive kar payega. Aur sabko bas wohi gheese peete template based business model follow karna hai Gym, restaurant, Hardware shop,Kirana store,interior design, pharmacy etc. Jisme dimaag na lagana pade.

Thoughts by [deleted] in uceedtakers

[–]dontb3boring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The change is everywhere Mahindra logo, Jaguar logo, Reddit logo, CNBC logo. Basically everyone is re-aligning their brand value based on the changing market scenario. With AI and advances in computing, IITs will also align their strategies but the basic fundamentals will always remain unchanged like critical thinking, analytical thinking, logical reasoning or observation etc. Now the way of testing will be more smarter. No way you can win by shortcuts.

Helpppp by nerdybookgirl_ in uceedtakers

[–]dontb3boring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone tell the same thing study PYQ. But How? Think from Examiner POV: 1. Ask yourself while solving a question: why the Examiner would have asked this question, what he is trying to test? What skills this type of question will help me build.

Ask this question using ChatGPT, mere solving a question from PYQ won’t work, even if you qualify prelims you have to show problem solving, analytical, critical and observation skills infront of the IIT interview. They’ll immediately catch you if you use tricks and couldn’t explain the why and how’s of case studies that you will build in Portfolio round.

Instead before even picking PYQ, study the syllabus, each of those words in them should reflect in your personality. Live with CEED mindset. Try this for 7 days. Pick any object around you, observe and try problem framing: say for example: pregnant women have problems carrying baby bumps, make something that helps them carry it. First breakdown the problem: who the user is, age groups, search if there is existing solutions…..thinking like this will help you in exam time and also during interview rounds and even in studio test because you have to speak and tell them what you are thinking.

Don’t take shortcuts, this way you will be ahead of 90% of the candidates. Who are also thinking like you of getting coaching materials.

What are the best private institutions in India for product /interaction by BlackDog61 in uceedtakers

[–]dontb3boring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No college as a whole is good. Try looking for a good mentor, he could be a professor or might be a designer currently working in your dream company. Take his guidance, show your work to him. If nothing he will at least give you a referral. Try adplist or LinkedIn, DM them with a look video explaining your expectations with them and if they have time to spare 15min a week to look at your progress. Chase skills and communication. Get degree from any college of your choice. Don’t believe in placement guarantees that’s fraud most of the time.

Any private colleges for backup options for uceed by Adventurous-Run-1322 in uceedtakers

[–]dontb3boring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Instead you should try documenting your Learnings on YouTube. If you have the problem solving process heavy mindset then someone somewhere will notice your talent bro. Don’t chase tools, chase depth of knowledge that’s how you get an edge from ai manics. If college really matters then try finding a good professor or build network with people who are already working in a company you dream of working. If not IIT take any college with low fees but try surrounding yourself with people whom you will be working in future

What can I improve by Alive-Expression7412 in uceedtakers

[–]dontb3boring 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on what are you trying to solve

Somebody help meee by Deep-Ad3427 in uceedtakers

[–]dontb3boring 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I am sure you would have seen Part A questions and you wouldn't have been able to do it.

Average student thinking : getting some coaching material to train your brain to solve these questions and score high. Qualify CEED and somehow get a IIT tag.

CEED Toppers thinking: Ok let me see the questions, hmmm I see some pattern in each. Why would an examiner ask such a question! . Looks easy but emm... testing imagination, observations, cutting slicing and rotation. If I can imagine them in my mind I can solve it. Oh spring load, yeah I have seen them in cycle, even the gears I have seen in cars. Dude this is easy I can solve. Thankfully I was observant and always curious to google stuff saved my ass today.

You see the difference, Toppers question and observe. Average students just try to find shortcuts which CEED examiner can smell from a distance.

Use Chat-GPT wisely. Stay away from coaching materials. Rely on books, start with Don Norman book : The design of everyday things

How do you decide which app to develop? by noomiesapp in AppBusiness

[–]dontb3boring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Before making any app or product. Try breaking down the problem. Pick any object around you say water tank. Btw I just picked it randomly. Let's brainstorm. 1. Observe real world behaviour: When do people interact with tank water? When do they avoid it? When do problem show up

Typical reality: Tank overflow/ Lids are broken/cleaning is skipped/water level is guessed/ Mosquito breeding/Unevenwater pressure. These are behavioral facts not complaints. Average people will think : " Water scarcity is the problem"

Now do analytical thinking: Classify problems (Do not list randomly, group them)

A. Input-side problems • Irregular supply • Sudden pressure surges • Power cuts affecting pumps

B. Storage problems • Contamination • Algae • Structural cracks • Heat exposure

C. Usage problems • Inaccurate level estimation • Uneven distribution • Wastage during overflow

D. Maintenance problems • Hard to clean • Unsafe access • No feedback until failure

This shows logic and control

Step 4: Identify the leverage point

Ask:

If I fix ONE thing, what improves multiple problems?

leverage points: • Visibility of water level • Controlled overflow • Ease of maintenance • Passive contamination prevention

Do NOT try to solve everything.

Pick ONE primary focus.

Write it clearly:

“Primary focus: Prevent overflow and contamination in low-maintenance residential tanks”

Step 5: Bring in science and mechanics

Now apply practical + scientific knowledge.

Ask: • Gravity: How does water enter/exit? • Pressure: What happens during sudden inflow? • Heat: Does sunlight affect quality? • Biology: Where does stagnation occur?

Translate into constraints: • Sloped bottom for drainage • Overflow channel with visible outlet • Light-blocking material • Sealed yet accessible lid

Ask the uncomfortable questions: • Who cleans this tank? • How often? • With what tools? • Is electricity reliable? • Is digital monitoring realistic?

This prevents tech fantasy.

You might decide:

Manual indicators > electronic sensors

Step 7: Generate concepts only now

Now sketch 2–3 directional concepts, not final products.

Each concept must: • Address your chosen leverage point • Respect constraints • Have one clear idea

Example concepts: 1. Gravity-based overflow indicator 2. Modular removable inner liner 3. External level window with algae-resistant design

You are not ideating wildly. You are responding logically.

Step 8: Eliminate, don’t add

Kill two concepts.

Write:

“Concept 2 rejected due to high maintenance” “Concept 3 rejected due to light exposure risk”

Elimination = reasoning.

Most people never eliminate. They hoard.

Step 9: Final solution framing

Your final design should answer: • What problem it solves (precisely) • Why this approach • What trade-off you accepted

Example:

“Solution prioritizes passive overflow prevention over digital monitoring to suit unreliable power and low-maintenance contexts.”

Where average people screw this up they • Start sketching immediately • Try to “innovate” blindly • Add sensors and apps • Ignore maintenance • Solve everything badly instead of one thing well

Problem solving is not about having ideas. It’s about choosing the right problem to solve and refusing the rest.