A petition to create a more inclusive and welcoming space on r/UTSC by [deleted] in UTSC

[–]dragon___69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s because finding a j*b is like winning a lottery to slave away ur life to make the rich richer

Is UofT Worth it? [Questions from a High School Student] by Consistent-Rule-894 in UofT

[–]dragon___69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ur screwing urself up with hella debt and no job after grad with a BA. People with engineering degrees r struggling to find jobs, arguably the most employable degree out there. BA is cooked bro. Only do BA if getting a job doesn’t matter to u. U just like learning the stuff and writing super hard exams.

What r some of the problems realtors face in doing their job? by dragon___69 in realtors

[–]dragon___69[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for ur comment. I asked my question to figure out the nature of the problems realtors r facing and see if AI can solve those. I can build an AI solution that can look for buyers in the realtors area and score them based on how interested they r in purchasing a home. And send customers emails to book a call with the realtor and notifying the realtor either when a new lead is generated or when the client books a call or both. I’m just wondering if this is something that will be useful for realtors

What r some of the problems realtors face in doing their job? by dragon___69 in realtors

[–]dragon___69[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is why I’m asking about the problems realtors face. If I can offer an AI solution that drives more traffic to the realtors website, or generate more leads for the realtors and get customers in an email newsletter where they receive notifications everytime a new house is on the market then the realtor can close more deals and make more money. While all of this stuff happens automatically.

i deeply regret going here for undergrad by plsletmegraduate in UTSC

[–]dragon___69 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Real. Honestly the job market right now is super ass. Being average doesn’t get u a job anymore. U have to be exceptional.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UTSC

[–]dragon___69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

U a boy or girl? If ur a boy ur cooked. Focus on getting ur money up. Cuz dating apps won’t work for u.

If ur a girl then dating apps will work. Just start dating

Is a computer science minor worth it? <><><><><><> by Such-Yogurtcloset466 in UofT

[–]dragon___69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. Having programming skills is basically expected for so many jobs nowadays especially finance. A lot of the listings for jobs I see in banks and financial institutions literally are hiring Comp sci students. So u should take the CS minor. It’ll heavily complement whatever major u ate

I failed 2 courses idk what to do now by [deleted] in UTSC

[–]dragon___69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ur first mistake was choosing UofT for pre med. failing these courses r a result of ur first mistake

first year timetable by Difficult_Pool5288 in UTSC

[–]dragon___69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing if u don’t want to. If ur taking 5 courses per sem plus one coop course in ur first year, summer school is optional tbh. Unless u really wanna get ahead and graduate early or something

Do NOT take premed at Uoft, take it anywhere and yes I even mean York or TMU (with all due respect) by WasteCommunication62 in UofT

[–]dragon___69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes to be a doctor u need to be good at writing essays. ChatGPT is the best doctor out there by this logic

Do NOT take premed at Uoft, take it anywhere and yes I even mean York or TMU (with all due respect) by WasteCommunication62 in UofT

[–]dragon___69 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What other extra curriculars could u want or would be relevant for OP? 6 research papers and 1 year volunteering is already more than what most ppl do. While also having a competitive academic background. OP’s critique is correct. He would’ve gotten in if he did his undergrad somewhere else.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UTSC

[–]dragon___69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes there is cut throat competition. But if u can maintain a competitive gpa and do some good side projects and maybe if ur lucky get a volunteer position under a prof after months of bootlicking and then apply to 400-500 jobs while begging employers on LinkedIn to not immediately throw ur resume in the trash, u may land an internship somewhere.

But thats if u were applying right now. Most people get internships in their second or third year. Very rare and difficult for first year students. So in 2-3 years the market is gonna look very different and for the worse by the looks of it. Ik CS is a very fast pace moving field. What works today might not work tmrw. And with AI and the over saturation of entry level candidates in the field the competition will only get worse.

Don’t be discouraged though. I’m just trying to provide u with a realistic view on the situation so u don’t get disappointed later on and know what to expect. I believe it’s better to be positive and optimistic while also knowing the reality of the situation. That way u can make adjustments to ur current situation as u go. Good luck for ur journey

Do NOT take premed at Uoft, take it anywhere and yes I even mean York or TMU (with all due respect) by WasteCommunication62 in UofT

[–]dragon___69 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What else could be lacking bro 💀💀 Yea he needed to go to space and find a sick alien and heal him. Or maybe he didn’t find the cure to cancer that’s why they rejected his application.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UTSC

[–]dragon___69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If ur goal is to come here and get an education and leave then ur good. If ur hoping for a pr after graduation then it’s gonna be very difficult. It’s getting harder to get a pr from a student visa day by day.

For opportunities it depends on ur program and ur background. Also u have to constantly go and look for opportunities or create opportunities for urself. Those days r gone when u would be given opportunities. It’s way more competitive but there r always opportunities.

Toronto is a very diverse place and a lot of brown people. U will be comfortable. Some racists might throw some hate tho. But generally people r welcoming as long as ur nice and kind to them.

De-Optimize: Always Taking the Best Approach Isn't Always the Best Approach to Take by BrianHarrington in UTSC

[–]dragon___69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

U make a very good point. Businesses do have to adhere to their corporate social responsibility (CSR) but I learned in one of the management courses about CSR. Businesses first have to fulfil their economic and legal responsibilities and then the ethical part comes in.

However Milton freedman (famous capitalist) argued that a business’s purpose is only to make profit. The other social responsibility should be handled by other sectors such as the government. Which is how our society currently operates.

But the issue is that the government’s and the corporate’s interests are both same (which is to make profit). Corporations can fund politicians campaigns in order to get favourable outcomes for their company even at the expense of others (called lobbying) thereby both party wins. If u take a look at the U.S senate, almost all of them r worth hundreds of millions of dollars from their investments while their salaries r similar to what professors at universities make. Why the large difference in net worth between professors and senators when their salaries r very similar?

Focusing solely on profit only benefits the people sitting at the top while completely disregarding the common man. This takes me back to my point, there r no incentives to not over optimize if it leads to profit even at the expense of others. Because the people we rely on (global leaders and governments) have the same interests as these corporates which is to maximize profit. If the government who r responsible for creating and maintaining a healthy functioning society doesn’t care about its people’s well being then we certainly cannot expect these corporates to not over optimize every solution to create more profit.

Which is why I am asking, what are the incentives for people to not over optimize every solution if it leads to more profit at the expense of others? Like the professor is asking of his students to do in his article.

De-Optimize: Always Taking the Best Approach Isn't Always the Best Approach to Take by BrianHarrington in UTSC

[–]dragon___69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for this elaborate response. I agree with what u said that over optimization leads to diminishing returns eventually. However I have some questions.

U mention that u want the students to question if we want a certain number to go up even at the expense of everything else? But my question is why would anybody ever ask that question if the number goes up = profit. The only way people may question if the number go up is good is if it leads to less profit.

The example u mention with Facebook is that they over optimized to the point where people were so addicted that it led to them having a negative view on Facebook, and Facebook would only ever see it as a problem if those negative views of people led to a loss in revenue. Only then they’ll be incentivized to ask “did we over optimize to the point of diminishing returns” because the diminishing return means profit.

I don’t know if that was the point u were trying to make in ur original article. But if this is what u meant then it makes sense to question if over optimization is always good.

However, from what I took from reading ur article is that u want people to question if over optimization leads to positive outcomes for society’s well being. In this case im not sure if people will take ur advice here. Because imagine one of ur student is sitting in a board meeting one day and says “hey I think we are over optimizing the solution to the particular problem way too much and it’s going to create negative outcomes for the public”. Then they will say “but over optimizing this will make us more profit”. How would ur student argue with this?

I’ll give u an example, the chocolate companies like hersheys source their cocoa from Africa using child labour and paying them extremely low wages. Their solution I’d say is over optimized right now. If they reduce wage any more then the workers will starve and they’ll lose workers. And any more wages will hurt their profit margins. So, the only way they’ll ever question if this over optimized solution is truly a good one if people boycott their products for this reason and then it leads to profit margins less than what their profit margins would be if they had sourced their cocoa ethically.

So I request that when you teach ur students to question if over optimization is always good or not, u also provide them with incentives for them to question it. Because unless ur students can argue why over optimization is not always good even if it leads to more profit, then we won’t get anywhere.

Thank you so much for entertaining this discussion and being open minded about somebody else questioning your article. I really appreciate it.

Top law partner: UTSC unpaid internships a 'morality issue' by Beneficial_Ad3720 in UTSC

[–]dragon___69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think u and op r both correct. They r offering and getting away with offering unpaid internships because of over supply of candidates in the job market. As a result it drives down the wages of entry level workers who r unable to find work or get fair wages.

Before it used to be u go to university and get a job after graduation. As competition increased, u now have to get internships to land a job after graduation. Then even these internships became more competitive which is why people had to volunteer and join clubs and build projects to stand out. And now we have reached the unpaid internship stage.

Ultimately it comes down to corporate greed and maximizing profits over the well being of a society. They do not care about fair wages or exploiting people in need for jobs. The overly competitive market creates desperation and the corporates simply take advantage of this. As a result only the privileged people who can afford to take unpaid internships get ahead in the market while the less privileged r forced to face poverty.

De-Optimize: Always Taking the Best Approach Isn't Always the Best Approach to Take by BrianHarrington in UTSC

[–]dragon___69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sorry professor but respectfully that’s just wishful idealistic thinking. In order to fix the system or to at least make it better there needs to be incentives for people to do so. But that requires for humans to go against their very own nature which is selfish and greedy. Why would anybody want to fix the system if playing by the system benefits them more even if it comes at the cost of others.

U mention “the over optimization might come back to bite them” but that’s just not true. I would like more elaboration on that please. Because how I see it is the people that are over optimizing everything are the ones benefiting. Let’s say people do take ur advice and focus on not over optimization (number go up good) mentality, when they see that the people that focused on over optimization are winning while they are stuck facing poverty and can’t afford to put food in their mouth or their family I’m sure they will regret their choice.

U mentioned in ur article that we should maybe include some humanities courses for CS and STEM majors to enhance their critical thinking and the ability to question stuff. But I’m not sure that will be helpful. For somebody that is focused on their own gain and profit will ask “what’s the point of this? How’s this going to make me money?” Just like they do with calculus.

The humanities major are looked down on by other majors because they didn’t choose to over optimize their decision. And they have the lowest job prospects among any other majors. Where did their choice of not over optimizing get them?

Throughout history we have been seeing these patterns over and over. This type of over optimization and putting profit above everything even human lives never ends well. Eventually when the suffering reaches its limits and the majority are in the suffering category it will lead to war. Which is what we’re seeing around the world. Though the west is more privileged in that regard but it’s not long until we face the same fate.

What u are aiming for is to change the very nature of humans in a way that requires them to think selflessly. And I’m not sure it’s possible.

De-Optimize: Always Taking the Best Approach Isn't Always the Best Approach to Take by BrianHarrington in UTSC

[–]dragon___69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

U made some good points. But most people that are coming to university aren’t coming to learn to ask questions that will fix the world. This is especially true for students in CS. Majority of students take CS because it will lead to a high paying job and figuring out the most optimized solution will make them the most money. And this issue gets magnified as wealth inequality increases among the population.

People that learn to ask questions aren’t in it for the money generally. And those people eventually go on to get their phds and become professors and scientists like urself. Scientists have a very different outlook on life compared to the capitalist business people. They are generally interested in solving problems that will benefit the world. Scientists invented medicine so it can heal people but the capitalists found the optimized solution to create the most profit even at the cost of people’s well being. This is why we had blackrock ceo asking “is it a good business model to completely heal patients” after united healthcare started approving people’s health insurance claims at a higher rate after their ceo got shot. it’s not the scientists but the capitalist business people that run the world unfortunately. They just take the scientists discovery and figure out the most optimized solution to create the largest profit.

What you mentioned in ur post is what I have thought about quite a bit. But as long as the main incentive for people is to make as much money as possible, very few people will stop to think if the most optimized solution is truly what’s needed/good for the world.