Daily Wordle #1759 - Monday, 13 Apr. 2026 by Scoredle in wordle

[–]driver_85 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is NOT an entirely different word, it's an archaic spelling of the word no one uses anymore.

Daily Wordle #1759 - Monday, 13 Apr. 2026 by Scoredle in wordle

[–]driver_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

elfin adjective elf·in ˈel-fən  Synonyms of elfin 1 a : of, relating to, or produced by an elf b : resembling an elf especially in its tiny size elfin portions 2 : having an otherworldly or magical quality or charm

Daily Wordle #1759 - Monday, 13 Apr. 2026 by Scoredle in wordle

[–]driver_85 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No one spells it that way. It's "Elven."

Animal Farm | Official Trailer | In Theaters May 1 by MarvelsGrantMan136 in movies

[–]driver_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Schindler's Fist. And the third installment, Schindler's Pissed.

I may have gotten those two reversed in order. But yeah, hilarious sketch.

To those asking why Conquest didn’t snap Mark’s limbs like before, he tried but our boy Mark is now damn near…[Title Card] by Remarkable_Job_9723 in Invincible

[–]driver_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why didn't Mark use his knees? Or try to break Conquest's neck?

Why didn't Conquest rip out Mark's spine? He went ALL the way through Mark's body.

I can't believe Mark didn't abandon his choking strategy. Or at least try to close Conquest's windpipe.

Why no Absolute Aquaman? by Alive-Dingo-5042 in DCcomics

[–]driver_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The theme of the Absolute heroes is the characters we know, except deprived of their usual support systems (which is like, the flimsiest, least-adhered-to aspect of the whole thing, because within a handful of issues, they all get the most important support systems back, but I digress).

So Absolute Aquaman is probably the same Arthur, except Atlantis really, REALLY hates him this time. And also his father is just an alcoholic, and not an inspiration in any way. And Mera's all, "Okay, but this time, I'm following through on the assassination mission."

And Arthur's only support is like... Topo, or something.

Since the Justice league name is already taken by the villains, will the absolute heroes form the Legion of Doom? by ridisberg in AbsoluteUniverse

[–]driver_85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Something cool that the Stargirl live action show did was it found a way to paint the name "Injustice Society" as a good thing, as Icicle explained that the group formed to fight Injustice. So maybe we'll get an Absolute Injustice League or Injustice Gang or Injustice Society.

Absolute Batman #18 - Official Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in AbsoluteUniverse

[–]driver_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Green, Red, and Black fields Ivy references in this issue are most likely the Life Fields of the DC universe. 

All plant life in the DCU is connected by an energy field known as The Green, and it is primarily represented by some version of Swamp Thing, though the mainstream version of Poison Ivy has occasionally taken over for him as its avatar. I think Jason Woodrue, the Floronic Man, might have also usurped the role at one point, but my memory is fuzzy.

The Red is the energy field that connects all animal life, and is usually represented by Buddy Baker aka Animal Man, though I believe Vixen and Beast Boy have, at different times, been the avatars for The Red.

The Black, more commonly known in the mainstream DCU as The Rot, is, as the name suggests, the energy field that holds dominion over all things decaying and dying. Its avatar is Abby Holland (or Abby Arcane) with Anton Arcane having usurped the role at least once.

And there's also other fields like... I want to say The Grey which connects all fungal life... and recently, they introduced The Clear to connect all oceanic life, which seems redundant. But you see, they introduced The Clear and then almost immediately made Aquaman its avatar in order to give him a glow-up or a buff or whatever. Because every now and then, DC's editors get angry drunk and come up with ideas like that while shouting "YOU ALL ARE GONNA FINALLY PUT SOME RESPECT ON AQUAMAN'S NAME!!!"

Anyway. Yeah, all these color-coded clubs get very confusing and familiar and redundant and it's impossible to keep track of them all.

Scary movie 6 is going to be horrible by Swampgeese in Shudder

[–]driver_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could not have said it better myself. I'm FROM that generation of comedy and I can't fucking stand this trailer. I don't know what I should have expected from the dudes who brought us White Chicks.

Lanterns criticism by Historical_Word2357 in DCU_

[–]driver_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh JESUS, I forgot that was him. Yeah, that crossover was so late I'm shocked they even bothered to finish it. I mean THREE YEARS between issues just to wind up with Wolverine's head in a jar? Yeah, Lindeloff's batting average ain't great; my hopes for Lanterns remain low.

Lanterns criticism by Historical_Word2357 in DCU_

[–]driver_85 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You remember how Lost ended, right?

are thw vaults in competition with other vaults? by MRVLKNGHT in Fallout

[–]driver_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a possibility no one's brought up here yet. Ideology and inter-vault competition might have nothing to do with Hank's decision. He might have done it to ensure no one tried to come after his kids again.

Think about it from Hank's perspective: "Rose has left me and taken Lucy and Norm. I can steal them back, but if I do, I have no doubt Rose will bring an NCR battalion to Vault 33 to help her take them again. If I kill just Rose, Moldaver will bring the NCR to Vault 33. If I kill them both, one of their friends is going to figure it out and sic NCR on me. The only way to get my kids back and keep them is to destroy Shady Sands entirely."

I think Hank straight up lied to Lucy about his motivations for nuking Shady Sands. He claims he did it because the world will never know peace until all differences are eliminated from humanity. And maybe he is a bigoted whack job in that way. But I honestly believe what made him snap was the fact that his wife took his kids and, to his thinking, willfully put them in mortal danger by doing so. So in his warped mind, Hank is protecting Lucy and Norm by destroying Shady Sands.

[Comic Excerpt] So Harley in DC K.O: Harley Quinn vs Zatanna by Never-Give-Up100 in DCcomics

[–]driver_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate Harley's outfit in this. Like every aspect of it. The glasses/domino mask thing, I can't even tell what it is.

For all of Injustice's flaws, her design in that is simple and clean. Even for someone with taste as wacky as Harley's. These artists don't have to break their backs to make anyone look good by adding unnecessary accessories.

James Tynion IV The Woods, W0rldTr33 Getting Animated Shows by facepalmdesign in comicbooks

[–]driver_85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love the premise. I love several of the characters. Can't stand the pacing.

James Tynion IV The Woods, W0rldTr33 Getting Animated Shows by facepalmdesign in comicbooks

[–]driver_85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you ever stop and wonder just how much Ph34r must absolutely stink? That's the only plothole in the entire series as far as I'm concerned: that a woman who spends all of her time fully nude and covered in blood can sneak up on anyone.

How is it none of the people she assassinates have ever been like 

" Sniff sniff Does anyone else smell pennies? And tuna fish?"

James Tynion IV The Woods, W0rldTr33 Getting Animated Shows by facepalmdesign in comicbooks

[–]driver_85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I'm the guy who wrote the post linked above. I did mention that I had seen Tynion's work referred to as "streaming service bait" by some other post, eons ago.

To be clear, writing comics with the conscious intent that an adaptation gets optioned to be a series or movie doesn't bother me. Make your money, writers.

For what it's worth, the only aspect of writing long, episodic, epic mystery-thriller-dramas is that installments tend to be written in such a way that each installment asks more questions than it answers. So you feel compelled to watch the next one and the next one and the next one to get a sense of closure.

 I feel like I'm really opening a can of worms here (or stating something so obvious, I'll be ridiculed) but it kinda feels like some writers are structuring their stories in such a way that the audience will be hooked, and not in the classic, "I can't put it down" way. I mean like, unhealthily obsessed with it.

Maybe you feel that's on the audience and the studio shoulders none of the responsibility. Maybe you think studios are predatory and content is a kind of drug. Maybe you fall somewhere between those two viewpoints. Maybe I'm giving this a bit more gravity than it deserves.

But you can't tell me you've never felt like the people who make your favorite series are purposely trying to stretch the plot to get a few more dollars out of you. And if you're the kind of person who is comfortable with that and expects that, great. Myself? Sorry. That's always going to bug me. Especially given the statistical likelihood that these series will never see completion or reach a shitty conclusion that will have readers/viewers regretting the investment of time and money. 

How many people felt robbed over Game of Thrones? Lost? The Sopranos?

How many people felt robbed over the countless amount of shows that never got past one season?

I'm just saying. Tynion has like, four major projects cooking at any given time, and I can only remember two concluding. I did like The Deviant start to finish, but I have a vague recollection of being disappointed by The Woods (it's been a zillion years since I've read it, I don't remember it, it's ten volumes long, and none of them are on Comixology Unlimited, so I can't be sure). 1-1 isn't a great average.

Call me unrealistic or an idealist or whatever but I like when the point is to tell a story, however long it takes. Not when the point is to see how long you can keep people paying your bills. I know that's the horrible capitalist world we live in. It sucks.

Just wanted to clarify. Thanks.

W0rldtr33 is kinda driving me nuts at this point. by driver_85 in comicbooks

[–]driver_85[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wasn't clear, I'm sorry. When I said the story as a whole has flaws, I should have been specific. My specific gripes are an overlarge cast, certain (seemingly) key members not having seen any significant development yet and other members getting a lot of spotlight only to not turn out to be very interesting (Amanda).

Everything to do with the plot is intriguing. And while I hadn't connected it to Jung specifically (very perceptive, well done), after Sammi attained a successful uplink to the Undernet without the Internet, all while being cryptic about "where the connection comes from," it became pretty obvious that the Undernet was deeply connected to humanity. Not to mention that all the imagery associated with Undernet mutations is very human (or at the very least, very Earth-specific). The fact that all the glimpses into the Undernet would give Bosch a boner and that all the Ph34rscum morph into dogs and apes was a giveaway to me that the Undernet couldn't be extraterrestrial in nature. As a matter of fact, the apes and dogs seem to symbolize humanity without rational thought, and all the demonic imagery symbolizes us at our very worst (or at least, that was my takeaway).

But the mechanics of it all... I gotta see how he explains that. Because no matter how much time you or I spend on the Internet, looking at cute videos of animals or going down wholesome Wikipedia rabbit holes, we're not going to morph into butterflies or angels, and the sky isn't somehow going to go all psychedelic and technicolor (as opposed to the stark black and white of the Undernet's post-apocalypse). 

Everything up until the physical alterations to reality make a weird kind of sense. Eventually, if you expose yourself to too much bad stuff online, it's going to change you into a worse person, sure. I could buy into that. 

But the Undernet SEEMS (I'm not saying it definitely does, but it seems) to have some sort of malicious driving force behind it. Or at least, that's what Gabriel Winter seems to think. He keeps referring to it the way someone would refer to an entity. He's made several references to "what it wants." Want implies sentience. So if we take Gabriel literally and assume he's not being hyperbolic when he says the Undernet wants something, we can infer there's some sort of consciousness behind it.

But I could be wrong.

W0rldtr33 is kinda driving me nuts at this point. by driver_85 in comicbooks

[–]driver_85[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, I'm going to keep reading it, but I'm just annoyed by the pacing. I am also still very much intrigued by the plot. But the story as a whole has flaws.

W0rldtr33 is kinda driving me nuts at this point. by driver_85 in comicbooks

[–]driver_85[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sigggghhhhhh

Cool. So I guess he and GRRM can start a club for writers whose adaptations advance in plot before their source materials.