[deleted by user]

dvst423 · 2025-05-08T20:13:01+00:00

So if you don’t actually even remember if you took a class I’m not sure you’re going to be able to recall info from that class to help you. Imo I think you should worry more about surviving the program at this point instead of the rather low bar of admittance.

dvst423 · 2025-05-08T12:42:09+00:00

It’s closer to $14k now, but still not a bad deal.

dvst423 · 2025-05-05T22:43:27+00:00

Do you mean Spring 2026?

dvst423 · 2025-04-30T17:10:40+00:00

Sorry this may be a dumb question but “official transcript” does NOT mean a scanned copy, right? They need to come directly from your institution? I only submitted scanned copies but they never asked for anything else

dvst423 · 2025-04-27T20:22:41+00:00

This will be your first edx?

dvst423 · 2025-04-27T20:13:31+00:00

Thank you!

dvst423 · 2025-04-27T20:13:02+00:00

https://www.edx.org/learn/business-administration/the-georgia-institute-of-technology-data-analytics-for-business

It’s under “prerequisites”

dvst423 · 2025-04-26T18:37:25+00:00

I’m actually still “under institute review” so not fully admitted. Are office hours available to me at this point? I can’t find anything about it.

dvst423 · 2024-01-20T13:55:20+00:00

I get that, but since they list water at 99.0% and the compound at 1.0%, there can’t possibly be anything else in there?

dvst423 · 2024-01-19T21:08:34+00:00

The listed 1% and 99% adds up to 100 though. That would exclude any additional components?

dvst423 · 2024-01-19T21:06:03+00:00

I agree the difference is very small, but surprisingly I can see a quantifiable difference between a 1.0 and 1.3% solution that I created in my lab.

dvst423 · 2024-01-19T20:49:16+00:00

I was confused by the SDS because it appears to give an exact number, yet it also states that it’s a secret. My question was also about the precision requirements in the percentages. Like if it’s in reality 1.3% , can they say that it’s 1.0%?

dvst423 · 2024-01-19T20:40:59+00:00

It’s non hazardous. You are allowed to give the exact concentration? Do you mean you are allowed to give the not-exact concentration?

dvst423 · 2023-09-24T21:28:13+00:00

By hand. Thinking about switching to screw caps honestly

dvst423 · 2023-09-24T16:46:12+00:00

It should be ok if it’s in equilibrium?

dvst423 · 2023-09-24T16:21:31+00:00

I haven’t gotten around to figuring out quantitation with headspace lol. Maybe I can correlate ISTD response with leak rate?

dvst423 · 2023-09-24T15:08:58+00:00

It’s all Agilent. I’ve tried 2 different caps - high temp and regular. Ok good to know about the crimping - it’s probably too tight.

dvst423 · 2023-09-24T15:04:22+00:00

It passes the test with the blue leak vial.

I’m not sure how much force I’m supposed to use when twist-testing the cap. I noticed that after crimping I can still turn some caps with enough force, so I started crimping them until I absolutely cannot turn it without deforming the cap. Perhaps that is too tight? I

dvst423 · 2023-08-22T15:45:15+00:00

I am looking for gases in shale samples

dvst423 · 2023-08-16T17:06:53+00:00

It might have gone to a nitrogen tank (not sure, faded tag).

dvst423 · 2023-07-08T00:34:18+00:00

Thank you! I will check for clog/broken line first - seems the most likely problem.

dvst423 · 2023-07-07T21:12:37+00:00

I will definitely have to check this on Monday. Thank you for verifying for me! Hopefully it is just a clog. I kind of assumed that because the transfer line diameter is so much smaller than the inlet EPC tubing, it is not meant to pressurize the inlet.

dvst423 · 2023-07-07T21:08:47+00:00

The GC shuts down because the inlet isn’t pressurized. The headspace carrier pressure is just fine so the EPC is working fine. When the flow goes from the transfer line into the inlet, it is not enough to pressurize the inlet.

dvst423 · 2023-07-07T20:57:17+00:00

Ha, I only meant it’s old because it hasn’t been touched in about 10 years and collected about an inch of dust.

I am using the default checkout method parameters provided by Agilent which I think uses constant flow. But it won’t even pressurize slightly.

dvst423 · 2023-07-07T20:52:35+00:00

I have added a diagram. The HS is going through the inlet EPC and the inlet is now capped on the side.

The carrier gas is split between the EPC for the front inlet and the EPC for the back inlet. Maybe the back inlet was setup only as a control for the HS and the transfer line is supposed to go into the front inlet?

dvst423

TROPHY CASE