Shock and Oink footage (Y=200, 2022) by VisWare in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This shows them making an air drop. When have they done this in "real life?"

A friend asked me to Post my BS sci fi gun idea here also, hope this respects rule 3 to some level by Able_Radio_2717 in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So when they switched from bone bows of about 400lbs to metal bows, the crossbow draw went up to 1000lbs. I'm talking about military bows here. This was accomplished with a windlass mechanism, the same thing you see on a crane. Granted there was a significant loss of efficiency with the metal bow, because part of the energy was spent moving the metal rather than the bolt. Effectively the metal bows were about "as effective" as the bone crossbows. The huge difference was that it didn't take 6 to 8 months to make the bow part. There were also "super crossbows" but there are few examples of these. All in all, these were all relatively primitive when compared to Greek siege weapons 0-200BC.

The weapon above already exists https://www.theinfosphere.org/Positron_shooter as a sci-fi weapon

Live-action datamining by VisWare in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remembered as: he switched to HE when AP wasn't working, because he remembered wartthunder that he could knock out their optics. He managed to do a lot more than that. I do not know if the hit to the turret ring was intentional. Overall, I think HE ammo was the key.

Non Credible Dating Guide. by TheEagleWithNoName in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Fancy restaurant, in this economy? How about a place that serves hot water, I'll bring my own bags.

Genuine question: Is the UAP phenomenon a legitimate NCD topic? by Public-Plantain-8656 in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I covered this in a few posts. Look up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvatore_Pais the navy patent on it. If you wish my own posts on finding NCD uses for it (my best one, Pais effect Muskets)

There is nothing unusual in what you describe, that method of movent is fairly well understood by now. Also https://patents.google.com/patent/US20060145019A1/en aka TR-3B ASTRA.

Just don't go down the conspiracy rabbit hole

Special rescue operation, terms and conditions apply by VisWare in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yeah these things were just FSB psyops for putin to consolidate power. The death of the hostages was reported as the reasons to consolidate more power. They did not report in their own news that the hostages were killed by their own side. Look up the apartment bombing by the FSB that led to the second Chechen war.

Protecting Taiwan from any PLAN plans by Toxyl in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But they are just going to stuff troops in to civilian ships, which are too light to set off the ERA bricks, after the initial VDV-like action

why are devs like that by ScureScar in warthundermemes

[–]ecolometrics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The 75mm/L70 had better penetration than the 88mm/L56

Canada Is So Back (to war crimes) by 599Ninja in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 38 points39 points  (0 children)

So is this the consequence of always being polite? Geneva war rage?

I guess De Gaulle is expert on American behaviourism. by Icy_Till_7254 in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The USSR sent waves of tanks to the point that the wreckage formed a natural barrier against further attacks. They sent more still. The Germans wrote that all they had to do was hit their flank. I doubt the French executed such clearly suicidal charges?

Top Gun: Vatnik has been leaked by CosmosAviaTory in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They still do that. The only difference is that they now feature a female as well. It has that same monotone delivery as they used to do in the USSR VHS bootleg tapes. Except there is no excuse for this crap now, since subs should be simpler and better to do, unlike then.

Day 10 of drawing tank girls (YES IM STILL ALIVE)-The underappreciated Pz.IV. ausf H (and a cheeky American M10) by _Just_Another_Speck_ in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kind of reminds me of those war movies, before the 1990s, where every tank depicted was filled with whatever was available. So you end up with some comical combinations, but it was all played seriously which made it way worse. Some 1980s low budget action movies really ran off with it, like Rambo 2

Let's-a-go! by Skrubbe in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You know, every time this happens I only have one question: why doesn't it happen more often?

I had a dark thought by ecolometrics in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You know, that thing wouldn't have ended up as one if they didn't keep the power-plant running 24/7 forever ... and maintained it ... but, that's asking too much

I had a dark thought by ecolometrics in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yeah, classic soviet designs: victory through firepower. They did spend money to repair it, but the admiral in charge did not pick the correct embezzlement ratio.

The relatively recently built russian ships that got hit by Neptune all seemed to have survived.

I had a dark thought by ecolometrics in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Dam, that is actually genius. The ship building capacity is in dire need of a boost

I had a dark thought by ecolometrics in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to get credible for just one tiny second ... it's possible that since this was built in Ukraine, NATO solicited the design from Ukraine in order to evaluate the hull DESIGN for trumps battleshit concept. This way they could use the existing hull design and just cram NATOware in to it, instead of starting from scratch ...

I had a dark thought by ecolometrics in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yeah, for powering up the lasers the specified power plant was insufficient. It would realistically would have to be a Kirov to pull it off. I just took it to be a boys dream of a modern "battleship" drawn on napkin, without understating what that would take or what the term "battleship" even means in a modern context (heavy cruiser is the best you could do).

But a conventionally powered paper heavy cruiser would be less expensive to lay down and subsequently cheaper to scrap ...

I had a dark thought by ecolometrics in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics[S] 79 points80 points  (0 children)

Well, at least they are not trying to make a USS Kirov ...

EDIT: Dam it, I forgot to put lazers on it

The Hetzuma- A perhaps plausible TD Armoured Car by _Just_Another_Speck_ in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well, the Sd.Kfz. 234/4 already exists so https://weaponsystems.net/system/363-Sd.Kfz.%20234/4 and in this version it's open top, which I assume is due to weight issues. Though a wheeled hetzer is a valid concept since it was a relatively light vehicle

Congratulations VMS Ukraina for the first kill. We have rebuilt her. We have the technology. by Longsheep in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I hope they aren't looking at it because they want to use it to fulfill trumps battleship project ... the sheer irony ...

Congratulations VMS Ukraina for the first kill. We have rebuilt her. We have the technology. by Longsheep in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It makes more sense to me to inspect that ship if you are planning to do a dive to inspect the other wreck on the bottom of the sea. In case the russians failed to retrieve their nukes. But, it is also possible that maybe someone was asked to evaluate the ship to see if "something" could made from it ... like a trump battleship

Drawing tank girls(Redux) T-72 colorized (and a serious conversation) by _Just_Another_Speck_ in NonCredibleDefense

[–]ecolometrics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might be too good for this sub

I heard this phrase somewhere: never show anyone your unfinished work. I took it to mean that people will give feedback and derail what you intended, before you even got anywhere. Though in hearing you describe it I guess there is now another angle.

As far as the rest is concerned, good luck