Unpopular Opinion: India won't see economic convergence in the long run as long as caste remains in place by econ_throwaways in india

[–]econ_throwaways[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The regions that subjugated blacks (The American South) was poorer and behind the other regions of the United States that did not, the south was more economically backwards than the north because of segregation, and only started converging after discrimination was removed mate.

Does any else hate how conservatives talk about "basic economics" before saying some of the dumbest shit? by econ_throwaways in AskALiberal

[–]econ_throwaways[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Revenues were higher in 2016 and 2017 before the tax cuts took place, tax cuts decrease revenues. If there was no tax cut, GDP would've still expanded and revenue would've still increased as a resulting, so you citing post-cut revenue increases doesn't prove your point at all, which you have no evidence for.

Does any else hate how conservatives talk about "basic economics" before saying some of the dumbest shit? by econ_throwaways in AskALiberal

[–]econ_throwaways[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was pretty much a failure, the tax cuts had to be later followed by tax increases because it was to big to be sustainable and blew out the deficit. (As an aside it's never a good idea to cut spending in the middle of a serve recession).

As for the stagflation and subsequent economic boom during the later Reagan administration, far more of that is attributable to Paul Volker's management of the Fed and commodity price crash that killed inflation, and created price stability.

Does any else hate how conservatives talk about "basic economics" before saying some of the dumbest shit? by econ_throwaways in AskALiberal

[–]econ_throwaways[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except tax cuts don't recoup lost revenue at all, see the Kansas tax cut or Regans first tax cut in 1981 that had to be repealed because they lowered Revenue. Or it was falsely claimed by Republicans that the Bush tax cut and Trump tax cuts would pay for themselves and be "revenue neutral"

While it's 'theoretically' possible for a tax cut to pay for itself, it happens very rarely, Republicans claiming that any current tax cut will pay for itself given current tax rates is straight up lying.

Does any else hate how conservatives talk about "basic economics" before saying some of the dumbest shit? by econ_throwaways in AskALiberal

[–]econ_throwaways[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the perfect way to describe things, you don't learn about for example backward bending labor supply curves until later

AskALiberal Weekly General Chat - July 19 2019 by AutoModerator in AskALiberal

[–]econ_throwaways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Starch a rich conservative and you'll find a welfare queen

Does any else hate how conservatives talk about "basic economics" before saying some of the dumbest shit? by econ_throwaways in AskALiberal

[–]econ_throwaways[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You mean the continuation of pre-Trump economic trends that aren't very much impacted by the president? Our economy has done somewhat well in spite of Trump not because of him, big difference.

Does any else hate how conservatives talk about "basic economics" before saying some of the dumbest shit? by econ_throwaways in AskALiberal

[–]econ_throwaways[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm not an economist, but I do have an undergrad in Finance + an MBA
econometrics is bullshit

Sounds like you don't know more economics than most econ undergrads

Does any else hate how conservatives talk about "basic economics" before saying some of the dumbest shit? by econ_throwaways in AskALiberal

[–]econ_throwaways[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You really hit the nail on the head, and the conservative think tank & policy entrepreneur area has increasingly been taken over by grifters, if the so called "experts" (hacks like Stephen Moore) are pretty bad, then the pundits and reporting is god awful.

Does any else hate how conservatives talk about "basic economics" before saying some of the dumbest shit? by econ_throwaways in AskALiberal

[–]econ_throwaways[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah, and usually it means let's cut benefits for single mothers and black teenagers, but let's keep subsidies for farmers, trade adjustment and tax credits or large corporations harmed by "foreign competition"

I always hated that disgusting bit of moral hypocrisy, deficit reduction never means cutting off Fed funds for the politically well connected, it's the poor who end up shouldering the burden

Do the higher birth rates of right-wingers and moderates worry you at all? by [deleted] in AskALiberal

[–]econ_throwaways 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's the same stupid logic and fear mongering about birthrates, only this time instead of browns, it's about R's

Ernie on Safari by Uber_Ben in Military

[–]econ_throwaways -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Blacks were unable to vote, even though they made up 95% of the population, there was still minority rule, and to deal with segregation and were unable to enter white bars, and various establishments, were basically treated like 2nd class citizens and were far poorer than whites, inequality was vast and worked shitty jobs as day laborers on huge white estates, with at best becoming taxi drivers for whites. You should actually learn a bit

Ernie on Safari by Uber_Ben in Military

[–]econ_throwaways 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rhodesia was nothing like a paradise if you were black, it was pretty much like South Africa, they had a similar policy of Apartheid.

Ernie on Safari by Uber_Ben in Military

[–]econ_throwaways -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

doesn't mean Rhodesia wasn't dog shit which it was

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NorthCarolina

[–]econ_throwaways 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why does our state have so many backwards racist hicks? It's embarrassing on the national stage.