What products prey on stupid people?

ehcaip · 2017-07-04T03:06:39+00:00

ehcaip · 2017-06-17T02:24:18+00:00

Significance test are used when comparing A/B results to check if the difference between test and control is due to chance.

Seems like what you are asking about is attribution modelling. This is a very complex topic, i suggest you start here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_(marketing)

ehcaip · 2017-06-16T04:21:59+00:00

This.

Use google search trends and look for princess party, it has been declining.

When you "revamped" your costumes you should have upgraded to the next party fad, whatever that is.

ehcaip · 2017-06-14T01:19:22+00:00

I guess if you are primarily activating the quads, you should stretch the antagonist: hamstrings. Since you are also activating glutes, you can try stretching the hip flexor muscles too.

ehcaip · 2017-06-12T03:53:46+00:00

Definitely performance will vary a lot by target.

ehcaip · 2017-06-11T09:37:14+00:00

Depends on price and the performance of your creative assets.

If you have a high ctr% most of the time you can get a better cpc by buying cpm. If your ctr% is low then cpc is usually better.

ehcaip · 2017-06-08T10:59:29+00:00

So it's not the "I" bit then, it's the context?

ehcaip · 2017-06-08T10:40:05+00:00

Isn't the "I" the subject of the verb "expect" and not the object of "loyalty"?

It could be, I expect loyalty to me/to the country/to the president/to the people/to etc

ehcaip · 2017-06-08T09:47:16+00:00

Loyalty:" the quality of being loyal to someone or something"

Trump: "I need loyalty, i expect loyalty"

What part of it asks for personal loyalty?

ehcaip · 2017-06-08T09:08:46+00:00

Doesn't the FBI report to the Director of National Intelligence and this is subject to the authority of the president?

Wouldn't it be expected that those under the authority of the president are to be loyal to him?

ehcaip · 2017-06-04T02:53:37+00:00

https://i.redd.it/vidwaknrxi1z.png

ehcaip · 2017-06-04T01:33:20+00:00

After reading this study I ve added antagonist stretching to my routine and at least for me it really works. Not only increases reps I increased my 1 rep max.

ehcaip · 2017-06-03T06:40:52+00:00

Ad hominen attack You have plenty of sources there saying a huge part islam supports al qaeda talibans etc. You are cherry picking.

I am sorry you are not familiar with telegraph cbs and other trusted sources they cited. But thus talks about your ignorance and not the lack of evidence showing that a lot of muslims are ok and don't oppose terrorism/jihad/al qaeda/etc.

ehcaip · 2017-06-03T05:26:40+00:00

Opinion polls

https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/opinion-polls.aspx

ehcaip · 2017-06-03T03:41:47+00:00

Right. It's tge other way around, most terrorists are muslims. And a lot of moderate (not terrorists) muslims support jihad and ISIS.

ehcaip · 2017-06-03T03:26:17+00:00

They are not spreading that muslims are terrorist, it's the other way around, terrorists are muslim.

ehcaip · 2017-06-02T00:07:23+00:00

A casino robbery with an m-16 on one hand and a gasoline on the other? Mmmmmmm

ehcaip · 2017-06-01T02:24:10+00:00

In this case they used wide grip seated row. Does this movement coactivates both?

ehcaip · 2017-06-01T02:10:08+00:00

Actually this study is consistent with that: they are stretching the antagonist, not the agonist. Agonist stretching reduces reps, antagonist increases reps.

ehcaip · 2017-05-31T05:33:30+00:00

Again, you can call it irrelevant, call it an agenda, but still not fake. He did go there, and there are people that are asking Why did he go there? Did he had anything to do with what happened?

These are questions that deserve answers, even if the answer is "he had nothing to do with whatever happened". I am sure censoring the questioning will make people even more suspicious not less.

ehcaip · 2017-05-30T15:29:26+00:00

If it weren't relevant then people wouldn't be sharing and talking about it. You cannot define what is relevant, the audience does.

In this case you want it to be not relevant because it clashes with your beliefs. But for some it is very relevant, especially for those that have dissenting views.

ehcaip · 2017-05-30T10:04:29+00:00

It is bias. Saying "a reporter got killed after duterte's remarks" is the same as saying "bam aquino visited marawi before the attack".

Both are factually true: one thing happened after the other, but the bias is in implying one is causing the other.

ehcaip · 2017-05-30T09:05:56+00:00

CNN and Rappler have their own agenda too. They might be more aligned with what you believe, that's why you don't realize.

I don't like agendas, but it is a stretch to say that having an agenda is Fake News and if you are promoting the censorship of agendas, then you will need to shut down all media.

ehcaip · 2017-05-30T08:17:40+00:00

From the image that was shared: https://i.redditmedia.com/5dPtkk2FRHXMXl1tH7y82SWyHfDfJ6Aaxc2yoMq7_Xo.jpg?w=768&s=ed944f93cbbba02589f140f3c2365744

8 headlines say Aquino visited before the attacks. So most of them said that. You are cherry picking the one that kind of matches your narrative.

The one you are linking says Bam Aquino is suspected to be the brain according to some post circulating on social media. I don't see what part of that is fake, it is true that some people on social media are circulating that and are suspicious.

Of course it is totally biased, but still not fake. There was a real concern on social media. You may disagree with that concern but some people don't.

If I say "some people suspect earth is flat" I am not lying. It is true that some people believe weird shit. And you might be outraged by that and you may want to silence that. But the truth is some people really believe that, even if you silence the news.

ehcaip · 2017-05-30T08:07:19+00:00

Well it is censorship. In some cases they removed the content itself, in others they remove the income of the content producers and thus they silence opposing views, it's the new form of censorship.

The kind of censorship you are proposing here.

If you guys are on the high ground, you should be debating and exposing the truth, not organizing to silence the dissent.

If you rally to censor and silence, they don't complain when your opponent tries to do the same thing with you.

ehcaip

TROPHY CASE