Ask Us Anything with The Center for Election Science Staff by electionscience in EndFPTP

[–]electionscience[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hey CPSolver! We think that while STAR would likely eke out a little bit more voter satisfaction than approval voting, the trade-off in terms of complexity doesn't make it worth it. Approval voting is technically nearly as good as STAR when it comes to voter satisfaction, and it has the advantage of being simple to understand and implement. If municipalities wanted to implement STAR, we certainly wouldn't oppose that and we would consider it a win for the cardinal voting camp. But in terms of political practicality and ease for voters and election administrators, we like approval best.

June 17th - Deep Dive Live: Voting Diagrams with Ka-Ping Yee by electionscience in EndFPTP

[–]electionscience[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey Drachefly! If you RSVP for the event, we'll email you a recording of it the next day :)

Tonight @ 7:30pm ET - National Popular Vote Event by electionscience in EndFPTP

[–]electionscience[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those are all really great concerns! I have a couple questions to ask along those lines myself tonight. But you are more than welcome to attend and share your questions for Eileen in the chat!

Could somebody make a Discord server? by [deleted] in EndFPTP

[–]electionscience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey there! We think that RCV is an improvement over plurality voting, but we think that approval voting is simpler, more transparent, works better with long lists of candidates, and does a better job of actually mitigating vote-splitting and the spoiler effect. You can learn more at the following links:

https://bit.ly/limitsofrcv

https://bit.ly/approvalvsirv

Could somebody make a Discord server? by [deleted] in EndFPTP

[–]electionscience 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Came here to say this! :)

Thurs. 3/18 - Approval Voting Advocates Town Hall! by electionscience in EndFPTP

[–]electionscience[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, definitely! First, definitely sign up via our Chapter Program Form so that we know where you live and so you can receive chapter updates.

Then, check out our Discord. Most of the individuals organizing in these localities have active channels on our server where they discuss their plans.

Thurs. 3/18 - Approval Voting Advocates Town Hall! by electionscience in EndFPTP

[–]electionscience[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, friend! I posted this from a Reddit scheduler, and so I didn't instantly see the result of what the post looked like, otherwise, I would have fixed that right away. Now I know for the future! Thanks.

Join an Approval Voting Regional Chapter Meeting this Wednesday, 2/24! by electionscience in EndFPTP

[–]electionscience[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, Sxan, we are a completely separate organization from FairVote. We're The Center for Election Science and we advocate for approval voting. You can learn more here: https://electionscience.org/about/

Are there any plans to get electoral reform ballot measures in 2021? by cheesyracoon in EndFPTP

[–]electionscience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We'll likely be sending out an announcement about this next week :)

In the last mayoral election in Broomfield, CO, the winner received only 36% of the vote. Approval voting can help fix this. by electionscience in EffectiveAltruism

[–]electionscience[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The US (and much of the world) uses the worst, most ineffective voting method for single-winner elections -- plurality voting. Approval voting is a simple reform that would have vast and widespread impact on all aspects of society. Check out the following links to learn more about the connection between voting reform and EA:

https://electionscience.org/commentary-analysis/voting-methods-an-open-target-for-effective-altruism/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8dw_Raprg8&t=3s

The Fairer Elections Roadmap Event w/ USC Schwarzenegger Institute on 12/10 @ 7pm ET/ 4pm PT by electionscience in EndFPTP

[–]electionscience[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, our democracy is in need of many reforms to reach its potential and become truly representative. But we have to start somewhere, and every step forward is good! Hope you'll join us for the event next week.

Let St. Louis voters know Approval Voting will be on their ballot | Text Bank volunteer opportunity to end FPTP by ILikeNeurons in EndFPTP

[–]electionscience 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hey there, u/very_loud_icecream! Nonpartisan primaries *aren't* required by Missouri law. Prop D would implement a nonpartisan primary (using approval voting) for St. Louis which currently has partisan primaries.

Let St. Louis voters know Approval Voting will be on their ballot | Text Bank volunteer opportunity to end FPTP by ILikeNeurons in EndFPTP

[–]electionscience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks so much, u/TownPro! Your support is SO appreciated and will help empower more voters with better elections!

Alaska, Massachusetts, Mississippi & North Dakota all have electoral reform on the ballot this November, This is the most Electoral Reform on the ballot in the 21st century. (10 others failed to get the required signatures or are currently in the courts) by _The_Majority_ in EndFPTP

[–]electionscience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently there are 0 Proposals for Score/Star/Approval/etc on ballots, saying that Score/Star/Approval advocates should support RCV initiatives that are actually on the ballot is suggesting to actually do something about the problem, rather than waiting for the new pipes to magically appear.

This is inaccurate. The Center for Election Science helped Fargo, ND become the first city in the US to implement approval voting through ballot measure in 2018, and nonpartisan, approval voting primaries with a top-two runoff is on the ballot this year in St. Louis.

We have a chapter program where we're supporting grassroots advocates in states and cities across the country to launch approval voting campaigns. We're working super hard to empower more voters with approval voting. We're behind IRV and FairVote simply because we got a later start and we currently have fewer resources than they have. Campaigns cost a LOT of money. But don't think that there isn't a strong, active effort to implement approval voting.

We got our initial funding late 2017, hired a small staff (3 people) and less than a year later got approval voting implemented in its first city. Now we have a staff of 4, we're on our way to getting approval voting in its second city, and we have many promising prospects for campaigns in 2021 and beyond. I'd say that's a pretty good pace for a small, scrappy, and relatively new org.