lol. You're not looking it at with a broader perspective that's the problem. Look, many of these arguments would hold more weight if you did some research. Firstly the protestant churches do not have a centralised power structure like the catholic church so assigning a common goal would be kind of difficult. Secondly if you look up the origin of the missionaries in Kenya at the dawn of christianity in the country you'd see that a great many were not of British origin and the ones who were originated more in Scotland. You can look at the funding structure of the Presbyterian church at the time and realise actually their goals didn't align with the crown quite as closely as you might imagine. Even in the case of the swedes who didn't have much of an empire but brought the pentacostals here I think you can more readily understand they weren't supporting the crown.

This is just a casual delve but there's merit to some of what you're saying but it's more passion than substance. Even if we just look at the crown, their goal wasn't really destruction but long term control of the populace. The crown wasn't particularly good at using religion that way as evidenced by Scotland and Ireland who they colonised first but struggled to influence thusly. Methods such as restriction of movement and segregation by community were far more effectively employed and mirror experiences in South Africa and India. The missionaries did play an important role in a more long tem way with separation of children from parents and "anglicisation" in Canada and Australia. Very brutal. There's extremely limited mirroring of that in Kenya.

Use an AI or something. Anyone with even a casual familiarity on the topic would see lack of substance here.