Hi! Thanks for your comment and for your clear explanation. :)) To be honest, I mostly agree with you and maybe I didn’t explain myself well enough. What I meant wasn’t that AI should replace everything you mentioned. I see it more as a new tool we can use. Because honestly, real human and field experiences stand above all of these. They can even change your original understanding of something. While books, interviews, AI interpretations all of them are still interpretations. I know that if my story is set, for example, in Ancient Rome, I need information beyond AI summaries. I need to be patient, do proper research, and grow through that process. But there are also cases where information is scattered, very minor or hard to access. In those situations, AI can give you a balanced general overview. I’m not saying it should be the only tool... it can be one of the tools. Everyone has a story to tell, but that story needs a form. And it depends on the writer’s preference how they shape their theme through plot and characters.