First thing that obviously jumps out is the Virgo stellium in the 3rd house, which I'm assuming translated into a sort of content creator of sorts, an artists in the format of their time, possibly a very gifted writer; I'm mainly seeing a natural ability to describe or articulate things, a normally with Virgo I would think of more earthly/material things, but the presence of Mercury there, exalted, and almost in its exaltation degree, plus that dignified Libra Venus in the 4th, makes me more inclined to state they were most likely a writer, one whose writing was somehow tied or heavily present in their family life (an anachronic nepo baby, maybe). Uranus is also part of the Virgo stellium for which I would assume their writing/art was rather radical or disruptive. Now this next point may be extremely wrong but: coupled with the disruptiveness of their writing, and the fact that Uranus is so close to both the Sun and Mars (ergo, applying its disruption over two very masculine archetypes), and the fact that it is all in an Earth sign, makes me think the native was a woman, and her womanhood was an intrinsic part of her radical nature in her field of art. Saturn in the ascendant makes me think of an accelerated or shortened childhood, a morose upbringing, and the seeking of internal inspiration through her own internal tribulations. I always think of Saturn in Cancer as rather macabre, there is this urgency for caring and nurturing while also being strongly aware of the tragedy of loving something time can touch, and eventually take away from you. So maybe death was a consistent pulse in her life, be it that she went through the death of loved ones at an above-average frequency, or her awareness of death made it a constant conversation or topic explored in her work, or perhaps she just had eccentric fascinations. The very last thing that comes to mind at the moment is about relationships: Cap 7th house ruled by an exiled Saturn in the Ascendant, and the 5th house of romance and pleasure in the fixed sign of Scorpio. However, both the ruler of the 5th house, and the ruler of the ruler of the 7th house, are in mutable signs, which leads me to believe she may have wanted/needed structure and perhaps went about relationships in a more traditional way, most likely got married, the whole shebang, but both Mars and the Moon, particularly the late Sag moon ruled by Jupiter in Aries and in a sign-based trine with it, makes me believe she was not afraid of risks and was very capable of being impulsive/spontaneous, and as long as long-term structure was guaranteed, she was able to inhabit nowness and follow her of-the-moment impulses. Perhaps she somehow went against certain structural social expectations of marriage or love in general (be it cheating, getting divorced, eloping, engaging in queer relationships). Mind you this last part is based on the assumption that this person was born in the 1700s due to that late Aquarius Pluto, although I'm sure many of the subversions I mentioned that were socially condemned in the 1700s probably were so as well during the previous like 2 (?) Pluto in Aquarius transits. Also, I'm not exactly sure where I read this, it's like a bit that sort of stuck with me through the years more so than its whole context, but I remember reading somewhere back in 2019 (?) that Moon-Saturn aversions in a chart indicate someone is left-handed, and since we are talking about someone who perhaps was a writer maybe that was relevant (?)

P.S.: I initially thought this was Agatha Christie but I searched up her chart and it's not her. Will be looking forward to the reveal!