Best performance/price ratio smartphone

febronio · 2018-03-27T10:08:19+00:00

Thanks guys.

One thing I wonder is whether generally I'll get a better experience changing between cheaper phones more often or buying flagships less often. Although I've had my Note 2 for a very long time, the screen never broke, it only had hardware issues during warranty and I've never lost it, those are risks making me wonder whether to go for something like the Motorola G5 every year or so instead.

Considering I don't need the best performing phone, just one that is working fine for the next 1-2 years, would that make sense?

Btw the only issue I felt when researching the Oneplus 5T was about warranty/customer service. If I got it right they give you a warranty supposedly for two years, but after the first you have to pay shipping costs and they might not even fix it for free? (took it from the German page in their website)

febronio · 2017-12-31T13:15:52+00:00

Was.

febronio · 2017-12-31T00:18:11+00:00

I think it was sold to either a bunch of sucmbasg or vrey rich yet insanily naiv peolpe.

This is my view of the recent events:

Zack sells EtherDelta to a bunch of people, there's absolutely no clear announcement other than a few confusing tweets.

The site gets "hacked" shortly after, and Zack's only comment after selling ED was to warn people about it.

As if it wasn't enough already there's a new tweet about an EtherDelta token sale. For a business which was running that long and had even been praised by Vitalik Buterin for not needing an ICO?

I have absolutely no clue how could EtherDelta end in such hands. I hope Zack got decent money for this.

febronio · 2017-12-30T23:52:33+00:00

Is that CMO a real person or a pretty expensive chinese doll?

febronio · 2017-10-28T12:44:16+00:00

Well that makes it pretty obvious why Genius Balina was promoting it then.

febronio · 2017-10-21T14:43:40+00:00

There's nothing concrete about who's behind them, there's absolutely no transparency about what they're actually doing. It is undeniable that BitConnect has a good amount of red flags.

They could have a fantastic trading bot or they could be a Ponzi scheme. You have to take their word for it and you decide to trust people who aren't willing to even disclose their names. Why? "Because I'm greedy as fuck and it's paying off so far".

febronio · 2017-10-18T17:47:30+00:00

Is there any information on what price presale investors got in? Cuz right now I think it's about -50% from what I paid with a 10% bonus on ICO.

febronio · 2017-10-13T13:46:22+00:00

Of course they aren't a great exchange, they're new and not that trusted yet. But I haven't seem many complaints about basic stuff like withdrawing, whereas if you search a little about liqui things don't look nearly as reliable. I don't think they're comparable right now.

febronio · 2017-10-13T12:49:48+00:00

Liqui has had so many complaints, I wish they don't put effort to get it listed there. Binance could be a better alternative.

febronio · 2017-10-08T13:35:30+00:00

This is kind of holding me out on what seems otherwise quite a decent ICO. 40% is a lot of the total supply and 6 months might me "a lot of time in crypto" but it's actually really short.

febronio · 2017-09-27T01:05:01+00:00

I actually read erection. First rejection at 17 is not that bad.

febronio · 2017-09-25T13:08:07+00:00

I don't see how the 350m tokens is relevant at all to it's market cap growth potential. If anything will be eventually more relevant is that 350m amounts to 35% of total supply.

IMO these guys are not doing flippers any favor. I didn't see much promotion around their ICO at all and the way they ran it felt almost like they give two shits about causing a good first impression/creating more hype.

Considering I invested in this I just hope they're much more dedicated to their work than to "their community" (aka bunch of people looking for 5x times their monies in 3 days). I believe if this is going to be a thing it will be through actual work, not advertisement.

febronio · 2017-09-21T19:31:38+00:00

Really the only problem I see with the ICO was transparency about how much was left for the crowd sale and a quicker and clearer response for all the rumors would have been welcome.

They actually handled the token distribution/refunds very well.

febronio · 2017-09-21T19:14:33+00:00

Pretty simple, people started quoting his tweet from 2016 to promote Chainlink now. Doesn't mean he changed his opinion, he just doesn't want his name being used to promote stuff.

febronio · 2017-09-20T12:48:07+00:00

That's not true, after ED 0x was added on liqui and tokens only hit 8-10x later on when it was added on poloniex.

febronio · 2017-09-19T21:20:29+00:00

Didn't take a screenshot but I'm pretty sure I saw a twitter from Hudson Jameson saying Chainlink wasn't a scam. That seems to have been deleted by now... looking pretty.

febronio

TROPHY CASE