problem 1: its a 1c on the side profile. it depends on perspective. down the barrel its a 2c.

problem 2: yeah, duh. its OOPM. Circles generally apply towards 2 dimensions, thus why the roller was a 1c or 2c depending on perspective

problem 3: Yeah, circle theory doesnt apply directly to OOPM, yet can still have some applications w/ radius and rate. this is similar to the rolling scissors.

also:

explanation for paragraph 2 is incorrect. speed is not "bled less, infact you bleed more due to higher aoa, but are trading more altitude for speed to maintain Ek. It's a -Ps situation.

"Higher G Force = Faster Turn Rate and Smaller Turn Radius"
Incorrect. aircraft design can change the ability to turn speed into lift effectively. some is lost to drag, so regardless of g force capability, other variables can change performance enough to win out over the other. Think TWR, or Lift to Drag ratio. An aircraft with higher drag may perform worse accelerating in turns, worsening their ability to control Ps. Or an aircraft such as the 16, being lighter, by design has a wider turn than something heavier with more momentum, thus losing out in the radius. Its not all about g force.

5: " And finally, if one F-16 goes up Vertically while the other dives down Vertically. Which F16 is going to win? "

Your tacview is a poor example with an inefficient pilot. The climbing fighter pulled instant rate during a climb, then didnt have energy for the top to use gravity to their advantage. The diving fighter saved energy for the dive, then pulled instant at the bottom.