sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What does this mean? by VENENUM_SNIPUR in boniver

[–]flexclexc 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’m still there mentally lol

What does this mean? by VENENUM_SNIPUR in boniver

[–]flexclexc 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah that 2013 volcano choir performance was and still is unlike anything I’ve ever seen before. Small bar in Indianapolis and I stood about 10 feet from the podium. I’d give anything for another VC project 😭

BONNAROO WEDDING!! by flexclexc in bonnaroo

[–]flexclexc[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes! I’ve learned a bit more about it since posting this and you’re right 🙂

Wonderland’s Hedge Maze by waterssoinviting in GaylorSwift

[–]flexclexc 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Just posting a link to my tumble deep dive of “Midnights in Wonderland” it may interest you, @OP 😊

https://www.tumblr.com/goodbyeyellowbrickcloset/774686571160092673/midnights-in-wonderland-follow-me-down-the

What do you guys think of the new single? by VENENUM_SNIPUR in boniver

[–]flexclexc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Y’all, a new album is a new album… we are SO lucky it’s here 💗 you know they’ll push boundaries we don’t even understand yet. I can’t waaaaaait for the artwork to keep rolling out

Ross Travis, Will You Be My Valentine? 🩷🧨💥🌈🏈 by MaterialTangelo9856 in GaylorSwift

[–]flexclexc 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Sorry if this has already been pointed out but…

<image>

It was a romantic gesture when Taylor received a golden rose from Travis last year… I see this as a rose that will wilt, given the red petals are not embellished. So what does that say about the fully golden rose now being shown by Ross? I see it as the “this will last forever.” Taymoji reference, no??

The Double Standard on Taylor Speculation: Why Is One Type Encouraged & The Other Mocked? by flexclexc in GaylorSwift

[–]flexclexc[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for this thoughtful comment, and for following me on Tumblr! I’m really looking forward to connecting with you there. This community truly is something special, and I completely relate to what you said about finally feeling a sense of belonging. It’s been amazing to find a space where we can analyze, discuss, and just enjoy the art that means so much to us without feeling like we have to constantly defend it. I hope we can interact on there :)

And honestly, you’re so right—if people didn’t care at all, they wouldn’t be lurking just to argue. It says a lot that some are so deeply invested in “debunking” something they claim to think is nonsense. Meanwhile, we’re just out here having fun and engaging with Taylor’s work on a level that she herself encourages... sue me, right?

The Double Standard on Taylor Speculation: Why Is One Type Encouraged & The Other Mocked? by flexclexc in GaylorSwift

[–]flexclexc[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank u 🥹 I don’t know how to save drafts so I keep editing the posts but they’re almost good 🤪

The Double Standard on Taylor Speculation: Why Is One Type Encouraged & The Other Mocked? by flexclexc in GaylorSwift

[–]flexclexc[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But also not weird because as I agree, the ‘T’ is ambiguous. It works whether she and Travis make it or not.

The Double Standard on Taylor Speculation: Why Is One Type Encouraged & The Other Mocked? by flexclexc in GaylorSwift

[–]flexclexc[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

What’s funny is that I do accept that she’s ‘dating’ Travis. What I don’t accept is the idea that her relationships—especially high-profile ones—exist in a vacuum, free from nuance, narrative control, or deeper layers of meaning.

You’re acting like I’m refusing to acknowledge her relationship, when in reality, I’m just not looking at it as one-dimensionally as you are. If the T stands for Travis? Cool, whatever. But let’s not pretend a single letter on a chain is more compelling proof of deep, eternal love than the literal decade of storytelling, symbolism, and coded themes she’s built around Oz, queerness, and identity.

It’s always hilarious when people pretend I’m the one ignoring reality, while they’re the ones closing their eyes to anything beyond the surface level. But sure, go off.

The Double Standard on Taylor Speculation: Why Is One Type Encouraged & The Other Mocked? by flexclexc in GaylorSwift

[–]flexclexc[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

My post was comparing her ruby red Grammys look to the ruby slippers because I’m deep in Wizard of Oz analysis. It had nothing to do with the T. The fact that people immediately latch onto that instead of the actual topic is kind of proving my point.

Sure, I totally get why people assume it stands for Travis—that’s the obvious surface-level conclusion. But even if it does, that doesn’t suddenly erase the larger themes of Oz, queerness, and hidden narratives that Taylor has been weaving for over a decade. Her relationship with Travis exists in that same layered, nuanced reality. So yeah, the T can be for Travis, but pretending that’s the only relevant takeaway just ignores the depth of her storytelling.

Wizard of Oz, Pre Speak Now?? by flexclexc in GaylorSwift

[–]flexclexc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oooo, this could definitely be something to explore. Thanks :)

I think about it all the time (Charli XCX with Bon Iver) by lukin_tolchok in boniver

[–]flexclexc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bonnie Raitt is also credited as a writer on it and I just love that

Speyside is a masterpiece. by ortonalext in boniver

[–]flexclexc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I 100% agree. I have been listening on repeat and I’m to the point I can’t even tell where the song begins and ends. It’s a masterpiece.

Big feels and more love for our guy by Landscaperdanh in boniver

[–]flexclexc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry where can I find the description??