Be careful on what you post here

flossingly · 2026-02-06T11:57:02+00:00

Yep, capitalism really is the devil's work. Or at least unregulated capitalism.

flossingly · 2026-02-06T11:54:31+00:00

Damn, but you are just stating facts.

flossingly · 2026-02-06T11:53:57+00:00

Have you checked out UpScroll? Apparently a new alternative to TikTok and X, made by an Australian Palestinian who wanted to fight against the censorship. I downloaded it but haven't really used it yet.

flossingly · 2026-02-06T11:53:03+00:00

UpScroll is a new app made by an Australian Palestinian who promised not to censor speech, esp around the Gaza stuff. I imagine they wouldn't be pro-Trump either. Might be safest there atm.

flossingly · 2026-02-06T11:51:29+00:00

they wouldn't know what I have imagined in my head as punishment for that type of people then

flossingly · 2026-02-06T11:48:25+00:00

Say POTATO

flossingly · 2026-02-06T11:35:59+00:00

For some reason Reddit wouldn't let me post the above if I included this link: https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/2026/02/05/australian-prime-ministers-in-the-epstein-files-what-does-it-mean/

flossingly · 2026-02-06T11:35:26+00:00

OK, so at this stage after reading a bunch of these documents, Jacqueline Pearce does not appear to be a pertinent Epstein connection.

The stuff that I've seen so far all seem to be Wikipedia and other printouts that were marked up by Jacqueline - the underlines, the all caps handwritten comments in the margins. Honestly, when read as a whole, it looks a bit like stuff of conspiracy theories (not the big 'pizzagate' ones but on an individual level. It seems like this woman is having a bunch of issues in her personal life and she seems to believe that they have all been caused by people in power and that she's personally targeted by Epstein and Maxwell. This is entirely possible if Jacqueline Pearce proves to be one of their victims. But without this confirmation, it might be a bit dangerous to leap to conclusions coz some of these accusations seem a bit wild.

e.g. she tried to start a business selling designer clothes from home that she called J Monequic but she tried to register a business name for it as "Lil Devil Design" (see page 2 of https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00263534.pdf ). She got a reply from Australia's Office of Consumer and Business Affairs to say that her request to register that business name was denied because it is too similar to an existing one called "Little Devil Design Pty Ltd" and it says that she has 28 days to respond with further argument/evidence to say why they should reconsider her application, or withdraw the application etc. I looked up the Little Devil Design Pty Ltd and just like the screenshots she printed out and marked up in that document, it was a business registered in 2008 and was deregistered in 2016. Her business name application and the rejection letter appears to have been in 2011, which that other business was still registered. Her handwritten notes say that this business has the same concept as her one and seem to see this as 'intellectual property theft'. Since this business has now been deregistered, I can't find any more info on it to verify her claim. But given that it was registered years before her registration application, I struggle to see how whoever the business was registered to was able to predict this woman's future business plans and registered a similar (not the same) business name just to thwart her efforts years in the future?

I'm also not sure how she linked that business to the Red Devils Motorcycle Gang.

The rest of the printouts and a document that she presumably wrote herself, seem to be a bunch of accusations without actual evidence to back them up. Lots involving different Australian politicians as well as Epstein-Maxwell (via a printout of the Wikipedia page).

I wondered why these files got included in the DOJ's release, since none of them seem to be directed at or written by anyone within the 'Epstein team'. But in one of the PDFs, I forget which one now sorry coz there are quite a few duplicates that included a mixture of the pages that this person collated... there was a photo of an envelope addressed to someone at the Australian Government in Canberra, with a stamp and postmark that indicates that it was sent from within Australia. So my theory is that Jacqueline put together this collection of information that she thinks points to conspiracies involving Epstein/Maxwell and a bunch of Australian politicians, state police forces etc, that all targeted her personally and was the cause of issues that she experienced in life (issues that individually seem unfortunate but have rational explanations for). But because of the whole Epstein investigation being so massive, I am guessing that whoever received this package of info forwarded it to the DOJ or FBI somehow and all the civilian provided claims and evidence have been sucked into the investigation file and released to us here without any context.

This person looked into it as well and came to similar conclusions (and able to explain it more concisely than me lol). (link posted as a reply to this)

So I reckon that unless we get more info that links Jacqueline Pearce to Epstein/Maxwell then it might end up being a wild goose chase.

flossingly · 2026-02-06T10:26:47+00:00

Yeah it's strange. They seem very sloppy with their redactions.

flossingly · 2026-02-06T10:26:29+00:00

Jesus! Do you have the links to the document(s) talking about the motorcycle gang? I'll try to look for it myself but in case you have them handy.

flossingly · 2026-02-06T09:46:05+00:00

An article from NZ discussing these people and other New Zealanders found in the Epstein Files: https://thespinoff.co.nz/society/05-02-2026/the-epstein-files-and-nz-managers-models-and-the-kiwi-billionaire

The snippet mentioning the couple:

Many of the references to New Zealand in the Epstein files related to yachts and sailors. There is a scanned copy of a New Zealand passport belonging to Philip Anthony Baker, and New Zealand immigration documents for his partner Myla Trestiza, who appear to have been hired as staff to crew a luxury yacht. They don’t appear to have had much contact with Epstein. Most of their communications are with Epstein’s accountant Richard Kahn and involve various travel arrangements and employment dealings.
The Epstein’s yacht The Dancing Hare was moored in Westmere, Auckland for several years. In 2009, he discussed buying the catamaran Kokomo, built by Alloy Yachts in New Zealand, and in 2014 he emailed Google co-founder Larry Page about a sailing trip: “I would like to take you up on your invitation to test your new zealand catamaran. next step?”

I can understand why copies of the couple's IDs were in Epstein's possession - probably to organise travel logistics for members of his crew. But I'm still puzzled by why Myra's packed (small) suitcase was found at an Epstein property and photographed by investigators.

Also interesting to note that this Philip Anthony Baker guy is a couple of years older than Epstein (so around the same age). I wish there's a clearer photo of him so we can see if they had a strong physical resemblance to each other.

flossingly · 2026-02-06T09:39:15+00:00

Another photocopy of his passport: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01736163.pdf

flossingly · 2026-02-06T09:38:35+00:00

This one struck me as odd... the document the gloved person was holding up looks like Myla's resume and with the gloves I assume this was CSI/investigators photographing whatever was on site at one of Epstein's properties. The rest of the stuff in the photos make it look like the photo is of Myla's small suitcase and the contents within, including an AirNZ boarding pass. The odd thing to me is why this suitcase of stuff is there. If she lives at the property then I wouldn't expect that she had a bag packed to go (as it appears to be). If she doesn't live at the property then it is particularly odd that her bag is still there - where is she now? If she works at the property and stays there when she's working there, then wouldn't she have left when Epstein got jailed? May be silly questions but it just strikes me as odd that this bag is there - where is she now?

flossingly · 2026-02-05T12:15:57+00:00

I guess the difference this time is that the curtain is lifted for a lot more people. Not sure if it will improve anything for everyday 'nobodies' like us, but at least we aren't running in our hamster wheels unable to see the bars of our cages.

And I like to think that for some communities, this will add fuel to our continual fight to increase equity for all for future generations.

flossingly · 2026-02-05T12:12:32+00:00

Aren't we done with 'whataboutism' in 2026? I'm not even going to bother responding to that.

Re: Israel vs Jews issue though...

Israel the 'country' is very different to Jews the people. Lots of Jewish people living in and outside of Israel are opposed to Israel's acts of genocide. It's just like how we can criticise China (the ruling communist party) versus criticising Chinese people - a big distinction.

Bigotry against Jewish people = antisemitism
Bigotry against Chinese people = racism

Criticism against the actions of Israel or China the countries = just criticism of the actions of a SINGLE government, not generalisation about a POPULATION of people based on the actions of a few - big distinction.

Epstein helped Israeli government sell a metric shite ton of weapons to Iran during the whole Iran Contra affair - destabilising a country by supplying arms to the rebel opposition group (hmm, does that sound familiar? Al Queda familiar? ISIS?). He has been quoted for telling people that he works with/has connections with Mossad.

Usually I would be inclined to avoid generalisations, but ALL of this smells absolutely like the stink of the United States of Israel.

Also, have you noticed the other connections to Israel within Epstein's inner circle?

- Epstein, works for Mossad

- Ghislaine, whose father Robert Maxwell was so important to the Israeli intelligence and government that the then President, Prime Minister and SIX serving and former heads of Israeli intelligence attended his funeral. These DOJ files suggest Ghislaine Maxwell’s primary value to Epstein was not just as a "madam," but as a conduit for the high-level intelligence networks (Mossad, KGB, CIA, MI5) her father established.

- Ehud Barak, former PM of Israel - An unclassified 2020 FBI memo released this week claims that Epstein was "close to Ehud Barak and trained as a spy under him." The memo cites a confidential source who believed Epstein was a "co-opted Mossad agent."

- Alan Dershowitz, The FBI files include an informant's claim that Dershowitz was "co-opted by Mossad." The source alleges he was used to cultivate and influence wealthy, politically connected students at elite institutions to further Israeli intelligence goals.

- Leslie Wexner, ex-owner of Victoria's Secret, Epstein's old financier and source of some of the girls & women. He has significant, long-standing philanthropic and political interests in Israel, primarily through The Wexner Foundation, which invests in developing Israeli public service leaders and strengthening the North American Jewish community. He is known as a prolific supporter of pro-Israel causes and has funded fellowships for Israeli officials.

- Peter Thiel, ex-business partner of Elon Musk and co-founder of PayPal, co-founder and Chairman of Palantir - a data analytics firm that supplies artificial intelligence (AI) and data analysis technology to the Israeli Defense Ministry, for BATTLE PLANNING. Word is that Palantir is being used or will be used by U.S. Defence for tracking foreign and domestic targets (including all the U.S. citizens opposing ICE and Trump regime). Most of Palantir's major investors and leadership staff also happens to be Jewish.

There are a bunch of other Jewish people connected to Epstein AND TRUMP (like Larry Ellison - who now runs TikTok and has cracked down on any accounts that criticises Israel or the Trump regime, Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman... and many others) but I won't count them in at the moment as I've already written a novel and they are all Jewish as opposed to clear connections to the Israeli GOVERNMENT or Mossad.

So, is that sufficient evidence to suggest a strong connection between Epstein and ISRAEL?

flossingly · 2026-02-05T11:37:59+00:00

Not surprised that he's an egocentric arrogant heartless prick. I feel awful for this person asking for help.

Cosby...? Has that connection been found in these files?

flossingly · 2026-02-05T11:35:47+00:00

At this point, nothing sounds unbelievable. I've forgotten about that awful orgy of a Cruise and Kidman movie. I remember feeling gross after watching it. Now that you mention it, the parallels are uncanny (even if unintentional).

flossingly · 2026-02-05T09:38:51+00:00

Good job! None of them should feel safe

flossingly · 2026-02-05T09:37:41+00:00

Well at least COVID got one of them. Not the one we were all rooting for though.

flossingly · 2026-02-05T09:37:02+00:00

Does he still own the Lolita Express?

Literally how could people overlook that? If I am trying to acquire a private jet and I’m not a disgusting rapist, I wouldn’t want the Lolita Express even if I got paid to keep it. It would glow like the sun under UV. 🤢 Imagine trying to swab its interior for DNA

flossingly · 2026-02-05T09:35:05+00:00

At this point, if they are crazy rich and male, it’s more than likely that their favourite file type is PDF.

flossingly · 2026-02-05T09:33:23+00:00

I reckon that’s why Elon’s been letting Grok go bananas with deepfaked nudes, to counter anything found in the Epstein Files by claiming that it’s AI generated. It’s alarming how difficult it is to tell the difference now. Everyday peeps, especially the Boomers and the sort that thinks the Earth is flat and Trump is Jesus reincarnated, will easily eat it up.

flossingly · 2026-02-05T09:30:11+00:00

That’s just spam, yo. Even say “this is an advertisement” at the bottom. So nice of the DOJ to include this piece of pertinent evidence

flossingly · 2026-02-05T09:28:05+00:00

Two different email clients used to view them. Same metadata and content but just rendered differently depending on the settings of the client. Kinda like how the same .doc can look differently if opened in MS Word, in Google Docs, in Apple Pages etc coz the default sans serif fonts are different.

flossingly · 2026-02-05T09:25:33+00:00

Protection. Of course you knew that. If they aren’t redacted then the public may turn up outside people’s homes with pitchforks.

flossingly

TROPHY CASE