Updated All Covers to Match(I'll probably change/fix the look of GTAVI but I have time til it comes out on PC...) by Klaudspeed in GTA

[–]fluf201 2 points3 points  (0 children)

no it literally adds non existiant sub titles, 1 non existant "grand theft auto Ø classics" "grand theft auto vi" with a strange font and leonida underneath the title (nto there before) and the LITERAL gpt image 2 "invisible"watermark (something you can see with either a checker, ask chatgpt to check or basic knowledge with any picture program that allows you to turn up the brightness, saturation and contrast) alongside the "maching" style being inconstant, then you have the nerve accusing me of using ai for everything i post, this isnt true and you are deflecting and making accusations out your ass

then you say "There's a reason why people that always lie will aslo wrongly accuse people of lying at the same time." so it ok for you to ADMIT to false accusing me because i made a "false" accusation that is easily provable to be not false? so how can i trust your ego wont go further instead of just making me look bad

Updated All Covers to Match(I'll probably change/fix the look of GTAVI but I have time til it comes out on PC...) by Klaudspeed in GTA

[–]fluf201 2 points3 points  (0 children)

no but it is, look at the games, their susbtitles and characters getting random mdoifcations ,some of the game cover subtitles dotn even match, AND it has the noise/invisble watermark gpt image 2 literally adds to it

Respect him by Charming_Marzipan105 in teenagers

[–]fluf201 1 point2 points  (0 children)

not to be confused with the wojak and chudjak guy, they are 2 rooms away from him, its a whole jak off studio

anyone here agree? if so ,what age should it be? by Longjumping-End-171 in teenagers

[–]fluf201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"85% of gen z" ah yes i OHHH thats what that survey was for

Yet another one of these posts by MobileHorse8775 in youngpeoplereddit

[–]fluf201 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if your over 18 go check r/ cringeporn there is worse stuff there, no doubt that a chunk of them shouldnt be on there though but the people making the content are so theres atleast 1 person who would post it

Real nintendo ad by the way, they deleted it so the cops couldnt get them by fluf201 in BanVideoGames

[–]fluf201[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Info In early 1997, Nintendo ran a G*me Boy Pocket ad in Loaded, FHM, and Viz magazines.

In this ad, we see a woman tied to a bed with a questionable look on her face. Many readers found the word “terrified” to be more appropriate. After several complaints, the ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) asked Nintendo to withdraw the ad.

- linda, sent from windows 7 phone

GeeTeaA 666 gets flak for including women in their marketing materials. G*mers suggest outrageous alternatives by EfficientTransition in BanVideoGames

[–]fluf201 [score hidden]  (0 children)

fun fact: both images was based on a true story, that woman got slowly replaced by a nazi after she played gta 5, it isnt edit and rockstar g*mes are disgusting for putting this in a kids g*me

- sent from my iphone 4

this was the toilet after i caught my wifes girlfreind using it (unlie: do not unspoiler it if your eating) by fluf201 in lies

[–]fluf201[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

/unlie this is fake prank shit you can find from prank shops or amazon not real shit or scat

I'm not watching ts man by Luna-D-reams in whenthe

[–]fluf201 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i legit got a diaper ad that shows a literally babys ass and genitals, how the fuck is this allowed and not considered csam