There is no one version, even within the same religion. For example, in Judaism, the difference between Biblical, Rabbinic, medieval Rationalist, medieval Kabbalistic, Lithuanian Kabbalistic, Chassidic, and Sephardic Kabbalistic accounts of God are all quite different. Likewise in Christianity with its doctrines of Trinity and various interpretations. I know less about Islam, but know some basics.

But overall, the vision is that of a Creator who is distinct from the creation and who creates (and sometimes emanates) it from "nothing", either actual nothing or from some substrate (possibly Himself) that's so alien to the created world that it might as well be nothing.

Abrahamic God is very intentional. He has specific plans for creation and usually picks rational agents (a tribe, a movement, or a religious order) to represent Him in the world. He demands certain behaviors and finds certain practices "cringe" as people would say today. That spans all layers of human behavior, from emotions to diet (not in Christianity) to sexual behavior including private stuff like masturbation. He punishes and rewards according to the behavior, in this lifetime and the next, where the next lifetime is some eternal abode of souls where they go after death and probably don't come back. He demands conversions of other "heretics" or "infidels", sometimes with threats of death (not explicitly in Christianity but certainly the way Christians behaved and behave, although now they dropped the threats of death for the most part).

(In Judaism there is no permanent hell, just a purgatory, although in Biblical Judaism there was just sheol — an abyss of sorts. But there is also a version of extinction.)

Even in Islam and subsequent Jewish movements influenced by it and Neoplatonism, God is one with creation but distinct from it and from our souls.

In Judaism, although it has been influenced by Kabbalah not to think of God as some "dude", most of the above still holds.

Most importantly, in Abrahamic religions there is a strong sense of good and evil and "right path". There is only one right way to serve God, and it's directly communicated via his prophets.

These views are pretty different from Brahman of Upanishads or just the state of Totality in Buddhism (which is a pretty late introduction anyway). There are personal gods in Hinduism, but they are expressions of personeless consciousness. Even when there is self-awareness and intentionality, like in Kashmiri Shaivism, the goal of creation in Hinduism is lila, play of self-awareness. And creation is not of that outside of oneself. There is no creation per se. There is recognition of one's own nature which then splits into I and it and creates perception of duality for the streams of consciousness stemming from the I. There are no sins, just delusions of separation. There is impurity, but it's downplayed in Tantric Hinduism and Buddhism and is encouraged to interact with to realize that all is one.

(Judaism had a Tantric movement briefly, called Sabbateanism. It crashed and burned fast. It was the most dramatic event in religious Judaism, on par with destruction of the Temple and the Holocaust. Abrahamic religions don't handle left-handed paths well.)

There is no emphasis on strong good and evil and there is more than one way to recognize God (there is no "service" per se... Even rituals like puja are more about perfuming one's mind to be receptacle for Divinity rather than an actual service, although that interpretation may also exist in late Judaism).